Case Management of Long-term Conditions: Principles and Practice for Nurses
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction 1 Background to the Implementation of Case Management Modelsfor Chronic Long-Term Conditions within the National HealthService Introduction Primary care management of long-term conditions How management approaches have been developed Developing and delivering care Future of care The impact and cost of chronic disease Identifying patients who require case management National guidelines and evidence-based practice Embedding evidence in practice Making progress in the management of chronic conditions Modernising care in the National Health Service Developing case management and care delivery Case management in the National Health Service Promotion of self-management and self-care Partnerships and expectations Conclusion References 2 Case Management Models: Nationally andInternationally Introduction The context for case management in the NHS Impact of managed care models International models of care reviewed The Alaskan Medical Service Kaiser Permanente (North California) Group Health Cooperative (Seattle, Washington) HealthPartners (Minnesota) Touchpoint Health Plan (Wisconsin) Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (Connecticut) UnitedHealth Europe Evercare Amsterdam HealthCare System (the Netherlands) Outcome intervention model (New Zealand) National model of chronic disease prevention and control(Australia) Guided Care (United States) PACE (United States) Veterans Affairs (Unites States) Improving Chronic Illness Care (Seattle) Expanded Chronic Care Model (Canada) Pfizer (United States) Green Ribbon Health: Medicare in health support What do these models provide? Models in use in England Care management in social care Case management models in the NHS Joint NHS and social care Data for case management Evaluation Conclusion References 3 Competencies for Managing Long-Term Conditions Introduction Development of the competency framework What the competencies are expected to deliver The competencies: what are they? Domain A: advanced clinical nursing practice Domain B: leading complex care co-ordination Domain C: proactively manage complex long-term conditions Domain D: managing cognitive impairment and mentalwell-being Domain E: supporting self-care, self-management and enablingindependence Domain F: professional practice and leadership Domain G: identifying high-risk people, promoting health andpreventing ill health Domain H: end-of-life care Domain I: interagency and partnership working What the competencies aim to do Developing educational models to develop competencies Conclusion References 4 Outcomes for Patients Managing Complex Care Introduction The areas of competence and deliverables for patients/serviceusers: leading complex care co-ordination Identifying high-risk patients, promoting health and preventingill health Interagency and partnership working Conclusion References 5 Outcomes for Patients Advanced NursingPractice Introduction Advanced clinical nursing practice Proactively manage complex long-term conditions Professional practice and leadership Managing care at the end of life Conclusion References 6 Outcomes of Case Management for Social Care and OlderPeople Introduction Policy drivers for the care of older people Health and social care integration Cost of care for older people What do people expect in old age and how will these services becommissioned? What does case management offer to older people? Integrated models of care Impact of case management on older people Managing resources Outcomes for older people Conclusions References 7 Outcomes for Patients Cancer Care and End-of-LifeCare Introduction Gold Standards Framework for Palliative Care Integrated Cancer Care Programme Preparing for the pilot programmes Delivering the pilots Programme outcomes Case Management and ICCP Case management competencies what can/should patientsexpect? The real need for competencies Advanced care planning Preferred place of care and delivering choice programmes Conclusion References 8 Leadership and Advancing Practice Introduction What is leadership? What does leadership provide? Leadership framework in the NHS Skills in leadership Political understanding and functioning Setting targets and delivering outcomes Empowerment and influencing Levels of competence Other leadership frameworks What does good leadership do? Impact on organisations Leadership in case management Leadership and change Leadership is in every role Advanced practice Prescribing Advanced practice in long-term conditions Conclusions References 9 Self Care and Patient Outcomes Introduction What is self-care? Self-care and practitioners Systems for self-care Expert Patient Programme Effectiveness of self-care programmes Promoting self-care: staff role Self-care: models Self-care: the evidence base Using information and technology for self-care How do we engage patients in self-care? Conclusions References 10 What Does this Mean for Patients? Introduction Government expectations What do patients/service users want from care? Reported outcomes from management of long-term conditions Modernisation to enable outcomes for users of services Do patients really see improvement? Understanding the patient/service user experience, how we findout? Public Service Agreement targets Other assessments of user/patient experiences Patient-centred care Allowing patients to tell their tale Outcomes of care and patient experience Experience in case management Partnerships with patients: impact on experience Quality for patients/service users Impact of the provision of information onpatients /service users views and outcomes Conclusions References Index
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».