MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W56999186

What's in a Name? in a Business Where Plain Vanilla Often Rules, Plenty of Institutions Choose Monikers with Special Significance. Some Owe Their Origins to History, Some to Serendipity. We Take a Look at the World of What Banks Call Themselves

2004· article· en· W56999186 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueABA banking journal · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueBanking Systems and Strategies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSerendipityLawHistoryPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

of Drexel's lawyer was on the phone and he was plainly worried. It was 1988 and the family-owned bank had taken some big steps. After being headquartered for many years in its namesake town in Missouri, the bank had been expanding. That growth led to the decision to not only move the headquarters to another town, but also to build a new building, and, to top it all off, adopt a new name not linked to geography. The new name of Drexel was about to launch? Bank 1. Up until now, things had been going smoothly. Applications had been filed for the change, the new building's opening was only weeks away, signage had been ordered and was en route. And then came a call from a certain Ohio-based bank holding company. It seems that the Ohioans felt that they had dibs on a particular name and all variations of it--everywhere. Hence the panic call from Drexel's lawyer. Joe Balentine, CEO of the then $22 million-assets remembers his first reaction to the lawyer's call: Let's tell them to jump in the lake. But Balentine's attorney warned him that Banc One was a BIG bank with deep pockets. As much as Balentine felt of Drexel had legal rights to its preferred new name, it was plain the bigger player was willing to take the matter to court. A quick-thinking Balentine came up with a novel solution: He said, Okay, let's add a zero to the name and send the application back to the state for approval. And thus did the former of Drexel become known as Bank 10. What's in a name, a bank name? It depends. Sometimes there's a fascinating story or an aggressive marketing idea behind them. Sometimes the name is rooted in history. Sometimes it's an accident of location. And sometimes the connection is more mundane. (And at times an interesting one gets lost. Today's Bank, Vancouver, Wash., is yesterday's news, having been taken over in mid-2003 by another bank.) Often, a bank's name, like 10's, is based on numbers. There are, for instance, 676 First Nationals, four 1st Nationals, and 91 First Federals nationwide, according to FDIC's web database. There are 247 First States and two 1st States. But not everyone could be first, so there are eight Nationals or Federals or Second otherwise. There are a handful of Thirds, only one of them a commercial Sedalia, Mo.'s Third National. That Third, going back to the 1800s, is now part of Central Bancompany of Jefferson City, Mo., and, while it has locally based competition, Third is first among them, by asset size. There are no banks we could find, but there is Fourth Federal Savings in New York City. But we're still counting down. There is New Orleans' Fifth District Savings and Loan. And, finally, there is the famous fractional bank, Fifth Third Bank, of Cincinnati, the result of a long-ago merger of a Fifth and a Third. Some banks have gone beyond this, of course. Some took their names from money itself. In spite of mergers, there are still three Dimes,--two thrifts and one commercial bank--but no pennies. And though there are 20-odd institutions with the word Lincoln somewhere in their name, many don't play up any connection to the president portrayed on the copper cent or the $5 bill. Also in the spare change department, there are five thrifts with Five Cents in their names, all of them Massachusetts institutions. And in Pittsburgh, Pa., and Newark, N.J., you can still deposit your dollars in savings institutions with Dollar in their names. (The more adventurous might try Texas' Guaranty Bond Bank, or either Oklahoma's or Kansas' Stock Exchange banks, although none of these are actually connected with the securities markets.) Some institutions take the completely opposite tack, boiling their name down to the barest essential. For instance, in Indiana, there is an industrial bank called, simply, Thrift Incorporated. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,673
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,004
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,228
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle