Governance of Integrated Product Policy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Foreword Jurgen Trittin, Bundesminister fur Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (German Federal Minister of Environmental Protection, Conservation and Nuclear Safety) Introduction. Governance towards sustainability: meeting the unsustainable production and consumption challenge Dirk Scheer, Institute for Ecological Economy Research (IOW), Germany Frieder Rubik, Institute for Ecological Economy Research (IOW), Germany Part I: The governance approach of integrated product policy 1. From government to governance: political steering in modern societies Renate Mayntz, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Germany 2. Patterns and key issues of environmental governance: what's new? Andrea Lenschow, University of Osnabruck, Germany 3. Environmental governance and integrated product policy Dirk Scheer, Institute for Ecological Economy Research (IOW), Germany Part II: Integrated product policy in practice: varieties of multi-level governance 4. The European Commission's Communication 'Integrated Product Policy: Building on Environmental Life-Cycle Thinking' Klaus Kogler and Robert Goodchild, European Commission, Belgium 5. Promoting sustainable consumption and production at the international level: taking a life-cycle approach Guido Sonnemann, Adriana Zacarias and Bas de Leeuw, United Nations Environment Programme, France 6. Integrated product policy in Sweden Ylva Reinhard, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 7. Integrated product policy in Denmark: new patterns of environmental governance? Arne Remmen, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark 8. Integrated product policy: the product-related part of the Swiss government's strategy for sustainable development Christoph Rentsch, Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (BUWAL) 9. Integrated product policy as a tool in environmental protection: the Bavarian perspective Hans-Christian Steinmetzer and Uwe Furnier, Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, Germany 10. The IPP concept: some thoughts and comments Eckart Meyer-Rutz, Federal Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Germany 11. Integrated product policy: practices in Europe Frieder Rubik, Institute for Ecological Economy Research (IOW), Germany Part III: Shaping a policy mix: understanding the challenge 12. Integrated product policy and governance: a necessary symbiosis Robert Nuij, Environmental Resources Management (ERM), Italy 13. Integrated product policy in the paper chain Ellen Frings, IFOK, Institute for Organisational Communication, Germany 14. Extended producer responsibility policies in the United States and Canada: history and status Bill Sheehan, Product Policy Project, USA Helen Spiegelman, Product Policy Project, Canada 15. Extended producer responsibility as a driver for product chain improvement Naoko Tojo, Thomas Lindhqvist and Carl Dalhammar, International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics at Lund University, Sweden 16. The implementation of integrated product policy in southern Italy: the role of community structural funds Ivana Capozza, Orsola Mautone and Maria Angela Sorce, Italian Ministry of the Environment and Territory, Italy Part IV: Getting stakeholders involved: product innovation along the value chain 17. Complexity management with interpretive schemes: the contribution of integrated chain management to integrated product policy Uwe Schneidewind, Maria Goldbach and Stefan Seuring, Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg, Germany 18. Multi-stakeholder approaches to product development Esther Hoffmann, Institute for Ecological Economy Research (IOW), Germany 19. The determinants and effects of environmental product innovations Katharina-Maria Rehfeld, German Chamber of Commerce, China 20. Integrated product policy: an integral part of corporate practice Claudia Wohler, Federation of German Industries (BDI), Germany 21. Small and medium-sized enterprises and integrated product policy: attitudes and barriers Paolo Masoni and Roberto Buonamici, Italian National Agency for New Technology, Energy and the Environment (ENEA), Italy 22. Notion marketing and praxis transfer: how to bring IPP into reality or how to bring reality into IPP Siegfried Kreibe and Michael Schneider, Bavarian Institute of Applied Environmental Research and Technology (BIfA), Germany
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,016 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,029 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».