MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W58284813

Reading, regarding, and Waiting: Three New Documentaries from Nova Scotia

2006· article· en· W58284813 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Darrell Varga

Notice bibliographique

RevueCineaction! · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInjusticeSubject (documents)LawPoliticsFace (sociological concept)Media studiesPower (physics)FeelingSociologyHistoryPolitical sciencePsychologySocial psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Three new documentaries screened at the 2005 Atlantic Film Festival in Halifax evoke the saliency of place amidst the global flow of culture in distinct and compelling ways. Regarding: Cohen (Dir: Lesley Ann Patten) begins with images of the street protests from the December 2004 George W. Bush visit to Halifax. The images are familiar and, as always, evocative: a mass of ordinary people standing up to this figure of injustice. Yet the relentlessness of the Bush war machine mark these images, at least for me, as bittersweet and that is the feeling conveyed on the face of the film's subject, activist lawyer Lee Cohen. Bush visited Halifax to promote Canadian involvement in the Ballistic Missile Defence plan as well as to affirm the continued militarization of the Halifax harbour (a frequent port for American military and nuclear vessels). Cohen's face is grim, as if resigned to the necessity of street protest in the face of the intransigence of political power, but we hear his voice articulating the moral responsibility we have to disobey unjust laws--as measured by the simple but not simplistic rule that laws degrading human beings are unjust. Near the conclusion of this film, we revisit these same protest images but the meaning is fundamentally transformed by what we have seen. We now understand that the film's subject has come to the protest for affirmation, to know that there are others, others, who believe in alternatives to the present system of inequity, war, and misery. Lee Cohen represents people seeking asylum before the Refugee Board of Canada, where hearings are increasingly held by teleconference, meaning that the person facing deportation may never see the political appointee deciding his or her fate. The vast majority of applicants are displaced by war, famine, and poverty--the effects of military aggression and the inequities of global capitalism. Cohen describes the refugee process as the wild-west of the legal system because the decision to refuse asylum can lead to the death of the applicant upon return to his or her country of origin. It is a system managed by political appointees with no particular expertise in the issues at hand, overdetermined by the dominant ideology originating in the United States, an ideology of security hysteria and fear of the other, and where individual lives are caught up in the shifting currents of political expediency rather than compassion. Indeed, ethnicity has always been a prime factor in Canadian immigration policy from the racist policies toward Chinese labourers at the foundation of Canada, internment camps during WWII, the Mackenzie King government's none is too many policy toward Jews, to the current ideological hysteria. This historical context, in which Canada plays lap-dog to American imperialist ambitions is the context for the film which follows, in verite style, Cohen's impassioned efforts on behalf of his clients. The cases that we see unfold are lived effects of policy: a Russian sailor and (former navy colonel) who flees the slave sans wage working conditions of Russian gangster capitalism is refused refugee status in spite of evidence that he will be attacked by the Russian mob for testifying about, among other things, his ship's illegal fishing practices off the coast of Canada. The case is a powerful example both of how national economic concerns and individual compassion are sacrificed with the realignment of global capital. The second case detailed in the film is even more striking in this regard: A Kosovar refugee, whose status as refugee is an outcome of Canadian involvement in the 78 day NATO bombings in the former Yugoslavia, is refused status and takes sanctuary in a Halifax church for over a year. Only after sustained efforts on behalf of a large community of activists is she final able to gain her freedom--and this is the key to the film's importance, for while it focuses on the work of the activist lawyer who is also the film's narrator, it avoids hagiography in return for a demonstration of the commitment of community. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,116
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,233

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0140,002
Communication savante0,0050,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCineaction!→Même sujetCinema and Media Studies→Travaux en français237 207→