MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W583917933

S&T Revitalization: A New Look

2012· book· en· W583917933 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Davinder K. Anand, Lisa M. Frehill, Dylan Hazelwood, Robert Kavetsky, Elaine Ryan

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park) · 2012
Typebook
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueInnovation Policy and R&D
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Center for Science and Engineering StatisticsOffice of Naval ResearchAdvanced Research Projects AgencyNational Institutes of HealthNational Science and Technology CouncilCommission on Higher EducationU.S. Department of DefenseU.S. Department of EnergyGeorge Washington UniversityEuropean CommissionKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyYork UniversityDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyAmerican Society for Engineering EducationU.S. Department of Homeland SecurityIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceDirectorate for STEM EducationU.S. Department of EducationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. NavyNational Science Foundation
Mots-clésGeography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The issues impacting S&T revitalization and the supply of S&Es are complex and do not usually lend themselves to easy or straightforward solutions.Considering that the United States used to lead the world in the percentage of adults with college degrees but has now fallen to 10th place, and that the outlook for America's ability to compete for jobs in the global economy has continued to deteriorate in the last five years, we need to address this issue and reverse it by a sustained investment in education and basic research to keep from slipping further.Today, globalization of the S&E workforce plays a powerful role in the education and movement of S&E professionals worldwide.While it is debatable whether there is a shortage in the U.S., it is clear that the S&E professional of the future will be more migratory, alleviating the shortage if it exists.Educational opportunities, professional opportunities and higher salaries are all key drivers of the S&E workforce.While opportunities abound in developing countries, for now there continues to be a large influx to the U.S. of international students and professionals in S&E fields.However, global access to a quality free education from world-recognized and respected universities is bound to change this, while simultaneously creating even greater numbers of S&Es on the global stage.In a shrinking world where mobility is less of a restriction than ever, and where growing economies are beginning to recognize and address shortcomings in their educational systems, the question of engineers becoming a global commodity appears more a matter of 'when' rather than 'if'.The revitalization of S&T was examined six years ago in a CECD book entitled From Science to Seapower: A Roadmap for S&T Revitalization, in which ten recommendations were made.The emphasis in this study was primarily on S&T policy issues affecting the U.S. Navy viii Preface and Acknowledgements Labs.These recommendations were revisited in a subsequent edition, Postscript 2010.The fact remains that the total number of students graduating with a bachelor's degree in engineering in the United States continues to drop as a percentage of the total number of bachelor's degrees awarded.With this in mind, we propose to re-examine the issue of workforce revitalization and to focus, explicitly, on the supply of engineers as it is affected by culture, immigration, demographics, and globalization.Our primary purpose in writing this book is to generate a discussion at the national level regarding how best the U.S. can ensure the vitality of the engineering workforce in the coming century.We feel strongly that our engineers need to be well prepared technically, be connected in a meaningful way to the global science and engineering world, and be gender and ethnically diverse and bilingual in order to enhance connectivity with the global S&E community both technically and culturally.The authors wish to acknowledge input from Jim Short on export controls, copy editing done by Eric Hazell, illustrations by Kunal Sakpal, production work by Ania Picard and research assistance on various topics provided by Kevin Ray and Piyush Jain.This book is a continuation of our work and interest in S&T revitalization with the U.S. Navy in mind.It is not intended to be an original work, but rather a compendium of open literature.Its purpose is to provide timely information in sufficient detail to support the development of appropriate policy decisions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,105

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0100,014
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0310,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,151
Écart entre enseignants0,137 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDigital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)Même sujetInnovation Policy and R&DTravaux en français237 207