Survival Schools: The American Indian Movement and Community Education in the Twin Cities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Julie L. Davis, Survival Schools: The American Indian Movement and Community Education in the Twin Cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013. 328 pages. ISBN 978-0-8166-7429-9. $22.95 USD paperback.What might have motivated a group of Indian people in 1972 to create their own independent schools in the heart of the Twin Cities? American historian Julie Davis sought the answer to this question in her quest to understand the American Indian Movement (AIM) and its place in the history of Native American activism in education. In recounting the story of the Heart of the Earth school in Minneapolis and the Red School House in St. Paul, the author reminds us that AIM, then and now, is about more than political protest: the survival school initiative evolved directly out of AIM's local activism in matters of education, child welfare, and juvenile justice.For readers like myself who began reading the book with little knowledge of AIM Davis gives a clear synopsis of its history. Organized in Minneapolis in July 1968 by local Indian people fed up with racism, discrimination, and socioeconomic disparities, AIM started as a nexus of experiences that developed and converged over time. If diverse in origin, the collective always sought to secure and expand Native American civil rights, of which access to culturally-relevant education, of course, is one.In postwar Minneapolis and St. Paul, both stable employment and decent housing became increasingly scarce for Indian people. In response, AIM leaders developed an ideology stressing pride in Indian heritage. If the challenges of contemporary urban life stemmed from cultural loss, Native peoples' cultural persistence was essential to their survival. Early AIM leaders believed that public schools could not offer Indian children identity and pride in their cultural heritage. Envisioning a different kind of education that could, led some AIM people to establish the alternative Heart of the Earth and the Red School House.Davis is thorough and open about her bias as a researcher. She tells us she was not raised as a Native person and does not write as an Indigenous scholar. She did, however, grow up on the Leech Lake reservation and had many friends who were Ojibwe people. Davis aceveryone knowledges that the story she tells is her version of the schools' history, a version shaped by the environment in which she grew up.At times the stories seem repetitive, and yet Davis stays true to her goal to listen to Indigenous people talk about their experiences. Her version of the school's history and her attempts to interpret faithfully may have led to a desire to thread many similar stories together. The voices represented are consistent in their message. For young people labeled as troublemakers, who may not have experienced academic success in traditional educational environments, the survival school's unconventional structure was a radical and potentially empowering environment. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».