Interviews with John Kenneth Galbraith
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For over half a century, Canadian-born John Kenneth Galbraith (b. 1908) has been among most visible of public intellectuals. His articulate and controversial best-selling books-including The Affluent Society, Economics and Public Purpose, and The New Industrial State-and his very partisan liberal Democrat political and public service activities secured a place for him among rich and famous of his time. He worked as an adviser to President John F. Kennedy, served as U.S. ambassador to India (1961-1963), and edited Fortune magazine during mid-1940s. Among American economists of any era, he is rivaled only by Thorstein Veblen for introduction of phrases that take on a life of their own in literate idiom. Such Galbraithian phrases as the conventional wisdom and society have become familiar even beyond Galbraith's remarkably wide readership. No other economist of twentieth century, excepting perhaps John Maynard Keynes, can claim so secure a place in belles-lettres of English-speaking world. This collection of interviews documents long career of an influential economist and political philosopher who has spent much of his professional life in public eye. Many of interviews are occasioned by publication of his books and contain their key themes such as importance of Keynes, need to include power in economic thinking, and neglected priorities of aesthetics, poverty, and environment in affluent America. The interviews also indicate Galbraith's wide-ranging public service and his frequent hobnobbing with political and intellectual elite. Through collection, which spans over four decades, Galbraith's erudition, wit, and impassioned liberalism shine through, making this volume an essential companion to his works. James Ronald Stanfield, a professor of economics at Colorado State University, is author of John Kenneth Galbraith, The Economic Thought of Karl Polanyi: Lives and Livelihood, and Economics, Power, and Culture: Essays in Development of Radical Institutionalism. Jacqueline Bloom Stanfield, a professor of sociology at University of Northern Colorado, is author of Married with Careers: Coping with Role Strain. Her work has appeared in such periodicals as Social Science Journal, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, and Review of Social Economy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».