Performance Measures for Road Networks: A Survey of Canadian Use
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Encompassing 1.4 million kilometres, the road network in Canada is vital to the country. Managing the road network is becoming increasingly challenging as demands increase and resources are limited. To face those challenges, performance measurement is attracting growing interest from transportation agencies. With the expectation that what is measured can be better managed; performance measurement is being implemented as a core component of management processes in public sector agencies. In Canada, most provinces and territories use some form of performance measures to evaluate their road networks. However, the type of performance measures used and the implementation practices vary significantly between jurisdictions. This project, conducted under the auspices of the Chief Engineers' Council of the Transportation Association of Canada, was intended to share experiences between jurisdictions on their performance measurement practices. The report provides an overview of the literature available on the subject. Reasons to measure performance within transportation departments are cited. Issues to consider when developing a performance measurement program are offered. It is observed there is not one measure, or one set of measures, that can be considered the best for all cases. In each case, the performance measures practice depends on the specific conditions of an agency, its goals, its resources, and its audience. The primary focus of the project was to survey Canadian provincial and territorial jurisdictions regarding current practices for performance measurement of road networks. The results of the survey are categorized in six outcomes: safety; transportation system preservation; sustainability and environmental quality; cost effectiveness; reliability; and mobility/accessibility. The survey revealed the following: transportation system preservation appears to be the most highly developed and mature application of performance measures in Canadian highway agencies; safety performance is a priority interest, with most agencies using accident rates per million vehicle kilometres as a key measure; outcomes of cost effectiveness, reliability, and mobility/accessibility are subject to performance measurement in some jurisdictions with little consistency in application; measures to assess performance on sustainability and environmental quality are used to a limited extent by Canadian agencies. The report also provides an international perspective on trends in performance measurement of road networks focusing on the United States, Europe and Australia. There is considerable commonality amongst the categories of performance measures that are used internationally. Austroads is cited as having the most ambitious and long-standing performance measurement program, with 72 national performance indicators in ten categories. For the covering abstract see ITRD E139491.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».