CITY OF EDMONTON'S NEWEST EXTENSION: SEEING THE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In 1978, Edmonton was the first city in North America with a population under one million to build a modern light rail transit (LRT) system. last expansion in 1992 brought the LRT south, across the North Saskatchewan River and into an underground station in the heart of the City's university campus. In June of 1999, the Owner, together with Stantec (their Managing Consultant), prepared a scoping document outlining the planning objectives and project delivery for an 8.2 km extension of the existing system to facilitate LRT service to the City's south side. In December of 1999, Edmonton's City Council accepted the scoping document for information and voted to proceed with the planning of the $600 million (CAN) South LRT Extension Project. On November 21, 2001, Council approved the engineering and construction of the first phase. current line has an end of the line station located 26 m below grade. This phase of the extension involved bringing the LRT system to grade as quickly as possible. short extension will terminate at a new at-grade station, which will serve the University Hospital, a Performing Arts Center, the southern end of the University campus, and a future medical research facility. total extension of 650 m will cost approximately $100 million (CAN). major construction element is twin, 6 m diameter tunnels. Each tunnel is about 300 m in length. Through planning, engineering, and construction, the City and Managing Consultant developed and implemented a number of project management tools and documents. During the planning process, stakeholder involvement was paramount. City of Edmonton places such a high importance on this process, that The Principles of LRT and Busway Planning and Development are incorporated into the Transportation Systems Bylaw. As the project transitioned into engineering, clear project delivery strategies were implemented. These included the development of a project control manual, continued public consultation, and a risk assessment workshop. These procedures and documents continue to be an invaluable tool as the project moves into construction. With the recent completion of the two tunnels and portal, the project is half complete. At this stage of the project, a mid-term report card was completed to objectively examine the processes and documentation set forth at the beginning of the project. In comparing the original goals with those actually attained, the project team identified what worked and what needs to be enhanced. At this stage of the project, the management team can easily implement the lessons learned by understanding the Why? behind the effectiveness of the various strategies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».