The Ethnographic Imagination. (Book Reviews/Comptes Redus)
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Paul Willis, The Ethnographic Imagination. Cambridge: Polity, 2000, 153 pp. Paul Willis's study Learning to Labour: Why Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs (1977) remains classic ethnographic text. It demonstrates how theory, ethnographic method, and the deployment of sociological imagination can crack open social puzzle. Specifically, it explores the mechanisms through which inequalities are reproduced at the nexus of structural conditions and creative human agency. In The Ethnographic Imagination, Willis expounds on the ethnographic approach as such: how the researcher must there to grasp non-verbal meanings (decor, dress, demeanor, curses which communicate primarily by fricative f's and k's), while striving to situate experience and practice within broader analytical frames. Explaining how this is done is surprisingly difficult task, as anyone who has taught courses in ethnography surely knows. Willis is to be applauded for the attempt, but the delivery is, sadly, low on clarity, examples, references to related literature, and the sparkling sense of ah ha which, as he observes, well executed ethnography brings to the reader, whether primary interest is in the substance of the study or the way it was conducted. Willis begins with biographical vignette: his frustration, as student of English literature in Cambridge, with the Leavisite tradition of practical criticism, obsessed with validating the canon, and his recognition that the close-reading tools he had absorbed from literature could be applied to social symbols of an embodied, popular, dynamic and profane kind -- initially, hippies and bikers (Profane Culture, Routledge). Chapter 1, Life as Art, sets out perspective on art as a living, textual thing and as inherently social and democratic (p. 3). It is the life artistry of the 'lads' not mentalized or condensed resistance, which renders their cultural forms hardy and resilient. The point is well taken, but I fear the brief plot summary of Learning to Labour would leave the significance quite obscure to reader unfamiliar with the original. In the remainder of this chapter and the subsequent one, Form, he distances himself from theorists who have argued that culture is like language, to argue that is part of continuum of types of human meaning-making (p. 12). His critique is directed at language paradigm approaches, especially those concerned with as floating signifier, but it is carried on at rather abstract level without naming or citing the authors whose work he wishes to challenge. His corrective is a socio-symbolic approach which deals with homologies as likenesses or correspondences of structure/form but in essentially different materials -- human to the one side, and concrete materials, bearing humanly appropriate-able symbolic form, to the other (p.24). Whereas working class and subordinate forms may instinctively see in the 'floating signifier' source of mentalism which is ultimately about constraint and control, expressive use of and objects enables them to make own culture protected zone for . …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle