Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ConferencesThe 38th Annual Conference of Joseph Society of United Kingdom was held this summer at Spa University in Somerset, England, 4-7 July, 2012. This event went under banner of Conrad in Bath - though given famous English summer weather across latter days, Conrad in heavy showers might have been more accurate. In spite of unlikely spatiotemporal coupling of and eighteenth century milieu of a provincial English town (Bath is a UNESCO World Heritage Site) place is undoubtedly attractive. All meetings but one took place at Sion Hill campus of Spa University, which is location of their School of Art and Design, this set in a park surrounded by garden villas. The sessions therefore took place in working studios, on one occasion accompanied by a sculptor's side-grinder somewhere across courtyard. The road between school and town and river led (straight) down hill, past an absurdly steep golf course, Royal Crescent and views over Somerset countryside en route to Abbey, Roman Baths, and Britain's answer to Ponte Vecchio, Robert Adam designed Pulteney Bridge. In short, lovely surroundings were suggestive of a gentrified England one does not quite associate with Conrad's oeuvre; and despite Romans having founded town on an older Celtic site, it was perhaps even more difficult to align it with another of the dark places of earth, let alone more bucolic one attending (scholarly) closing of pubs.The conference was international, with researchers and teachers from (in no particular order, and possibly missing someone) England, Israel, Switzerland, Poland, Greece, Italy, United States, Canada, Scotland, Japan, Hong Kong, Albania, Germany, Argentina, Wales, and Taiwan. In view of upcoming centenary of publication of Conrad's novel Chance, papers on that text were welcomed by conference committee, and resulted in a pair of dedicated panels, as well as a number of papers linked to a broad crosssection of interests in work. Given official sanctioning of 38th parallel as world's most representatively populated band of settlement, it is fitting that this, 38th meeting of Joseph Society (UK), should have spanned broad gamut of studies, as well as cross-generational mentoring and generous spirit of both society's longstanding members and their more temporary guests. Especially heartening was encouragement and support - moral, professional, financial - made to younger colleagues arriving from as far as India, Argentina, and North America. Equally positive was good humour by which differing academic interests were met alongside productive meeting of theoretical approaches with more empirical modes of research present in single-author studies.Mention should be made, too, of two conference events in visual and cinematic genres that steered many conversations. First, Society was very fortunate in having Francis Mosley in residence in town. As many might recall, Mosley is acclaimed illustrator responsible for linocuts in Folio Society publications of Conrad's works. Many of these handsome images were on show (and for sale) in book room set out by Hugh Epstein for duration of conference. Here, apart from being able to acquire a wide variety of international publications on and by Conrad, one moved around room in presence of Mosley imaginative revisualizing of Conrad's fictional oeuvre. The artist also gave a slideshow and accompanying talk to delegates on his artistic process, while graciously (and unassumingly) fielding comments and questions from his academic audience as to why he did, or did not, choose particular subjects.A touch more perplexingly, Chantal Ackerman's often challenging film of Conrad's first novel, Almayer's Folly La Folie Almayer), was shown one evening. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».