Introduction To Engineering Problem Solving A New Course For 1100 First Year Engineering Students
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract Session 2353 Introduction to Engineering Problem Solving - A New Course for 1100 First Year Engineering Students Richard L. Porter, Laura J. Bottomley, Mary Clare Robbins, Walthea V. Yarbrough, Sarah A. Rajala, and Hugh Fuller North Carolina State University I. Introduction During the past several years, NC State University has offered several experimental courses designed for the first year student in engineering; IMPEC, an integrated approach to mathematics, physics, engineering, and chemistry 1,2; E123, a mechanical dissection course which is now linked with the first year writing and composition course 3,4; and ECE 292D, a hands-on team based design course offered to upper class students as well 5,6. All were offered as an alternative to the introductory course (E100) that had little academic content, no engineering problem solving, and consisted of a large lecture room format with information dissemination as the major goal. Although the alternate courses were excellent and well received by the students, none could be easily scaled up to accommodate 1100+ freshmen engineering students. In 1996 and again in 1997, a new version of freshmen engineering (E497F) was offered that incorporated many of the elements of the alternative courses 7. This was offered to 250-350 engineering freshmen randomly selected each year. Efforts are described to develop and deliver a freshmen engineering course for all 1100+ freshmen that incorporates most of the intrinsic features of the alternative courses; is firmly based on the ABET 2000 outcomes; stresses integration with other first year courses; and contains elements of written and oral communication, team building, critical thinking, multidisciplinary thinking, and problem solving. The structure of the course includes a weekly lecture in large groups, and a smaller team-based problem-solving laboratory which alternates with a required first year course focused on introduction to the computing environments on campus. The content of the course, selection of topics, texts, and assignments is described. The other component of the course is the problem-solving laboratory facilitated by undergraduate student assistants. The laboratory component is strongly linked with the lecture and has a device- dissection component as well as a project design competition. Incorporation of a meaningful hands-on experience for all students presented a considerable challenge. Facilitation of the laboratory is discussed and the device-dissection component is described in another paper 8. Students' attitudes about engineering and the entire first year experience were assessed using the Pittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitudes Survey © (PFEAS) 9,10,11.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle