Proceedings of the second international workshop on Mobility management & wireless access protocols
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We are delighted to welcome you to Philadelphia for the 2004 ACM International Workshop on Mobility Management and Wireless Access (MobiWAC 2004). With the advent of wireless and mobile devices, wireless communication technology is enjoying its fastest growth period in history, and this is likely to continue in the near future, while affecting the way we live and work. Yet, mobility and wireless device access are still in their early stage of development. This workshop was created to highlight two of the important challenges in realizing the dream of anytime, anywhere communication and computing, i.e., mobility management and wireless access. This MobiCom workshop follows the successful first MobiWac Workshop that was held in Forth Worth, TX last year.The workshop program proudly presented to you consists of an impressive set of high quality technical papers and posters. Also featured is a high-profile keynote address from Prof. Sajal Das of the University of Texas, a distinguished and well known researcher who has made significant contributions to wireless networking. We do hope that you will find the presentations useful to your own research and lead to further innovations in this field.The success of this workshop required significant effort and dedication on the part of many people. We greatly appreciate the tireless and diligent efforts of Prof. Sotiris Nikoletseas, the Program Committee Chair, who put together an excellent technical program especially given the short review turnaround time. We are indebted to the members of the Technical Program Committee who were remarkable in completing reviews in a timely manner, especially given the short review time. We are also thankful to our publicity chair, Mirela Sechi Moretti Annoni Notare, for persistently advertising this event in several ways that gained us significant visibility in the research community. We extend our greatest gratitude to our sponsor ACM SIGMOBILE, MobiCom 2004 Organizing committee and to the ACM Staff for all their support.Most of all, we would like to thank all of you, the attendees, for supporting this workshop. We encourage you to interactively participate in this workshop and avail of the numerous networking opportunities. We also hope that you have had or will find the time to explore this historical city of Philadelphia, one-time national capital. Finally, we solicit your continued support in the future and welcome your valuable feedback and comments.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle