Marvelous Transformations: An Anthology of Fairy Tales and Contemporary Critical Perspectives ed. by Christine A. Jones and Jennifer Schacker (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Marvelous Transformations: An Anthology of Fairy Tales and Critical Perspectives. Edited by Christine A. Jones and Jennifer Schacker. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press, 2013. 580 pp.With Marvelous Transformations: An Anthology of Fairy Tales and Critical Perspectives, edited by Christine A. Jones and Jennifer Schacker, Broadview Press has made a rich addition to its line of fairytalerelated texts. This volume is unusual in a variety of fruitful ways and will be an excellent resource for graduate and undergraduate students as well as their professors. Marvelous Transformations is dedicated to guiding the reader to the genre of the fairy tale and its development as a whole, rather than to individual tale types. To that end, not only do the editors organize the included tales by era of composition or recording rather than by type, but they also include brief essays by prominent scholars highlighting different perspectives on key issues in contemporary studies instead of attempting to encapsulate the history of scholarship on fairy tales. Further, the online components of the book allow for an expanded table of contents. This is a volume well worth adding to any library, personal or institutional, with much to offer and only a few flaws.Whereas most scholarly compendiums of fairy tales organize their tales by theme or type, so that the reader can trace, for example, ATU 510A from Yeh-hsien to Angela Carter's Ashputtle, or, Mother's Ghost, Marvelous Transformations is less interested in tracing the development of any one tale type than it is in tracing the development of the genre itself. Thus Part I: Tales, is divided into five historical sections: Early Written Traditions, Early Print Traditions, Romanticism to the fin de siecle, Modem/Postmodem Tales, and Contemporary Transcriptions and Translations. Within each one of these sections, we are given a wide variety of tales from across Europe and the Mediterranean. This method of organization provides the reader, then, with the opportunity to read Giambattista Basile's Cinderella Cat (as the title is rendered here) in the context of three of his other tales, two of them much less well known, rather than as one of several versions of ATU 510A. Freed of the requirement that tales of the same type be juxtaposed, connections can also be more easily made among the tales of les precieuses, and there is room for some of the Norwegian tales of Peter Christian Asbjornsen and Jorgen Engebretsen Moe, with their bold and bawdy heroines. This decision allows the pan-European development of the genre and the spreading influence of, for example, the work of the Grimms in the nineteenth century, to be more easily grasped.This first part of the book contains several original translations, and the first two sections contain superb explanatory footnotes that add much to the reader's understanding, often by pointing out a linguistic subtlety not captured by the translation or by providing an important piece of cultural context. Unfortunately, those footnotes largely drop out of the text afterward and have disappeared by the time we reach the Grimms, so that there is nothing to indicate the various changes and editorial decisions that affect their Snow White or The Maiden Without Hands. Not even the Grimms' own notes on those tales are included, which deprives the reader of important information regarding the representation of gender and violence in these texts. There are a few other curious omissions, such as that of Yeh-hsien, the absence of which obscures the non-Western roots of the tale, and the absence of any tales by Oscar Wilde or Angela Carter. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».