MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W63180183

The Middle School Mess: If You Love Bungee Jumping, You're the Middle School Type.

2011· article· en· W63180183 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter J. Meyer

Notice bibliographique

RevueEducation next · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducation Methods and Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMiddle classAsidePsychologySociologyPolitical scienceLawLiteratureArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Caught in the hurricane of hormones, the Toronto Star began a 2008 story about students in the Canadian capital's middle schools. Suspended between childhood and the adult world, pre-teens have been called the toughest to teach. The Bermuda triangle of education, former Louisiana superintendent Cecil Picard once termed middle schools. Hormones are flying all over the place. Indeed, you can't touch middle school without hearing about hormones. Says Diane Ross, a teacher for 17 years and for 13 more a teacher of education courses for licensure in Ohio, you are the warm, nurturing, motherly, grandmotherly type, you are made for early childhood education. If you love math or science or English, then you are the high school If you love bungee jumping, then you are the middle school type. Even in professional journals you catch the drift of middle-school madness. Mayhem in the Middle was a particularly provocative study by Cheri Pierson Yecke published by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute in 2005. American middle schools have become the places academic achievement goes to die, wrote Yecke. Hyperbole? Or sad reality? Sometime last year, while walking the hallway of my school district's middle school, was pulled aside by of our veteran teachers, who seemed agitated. was more than happy to chat. had known this teacher for years. Let's call her Miss Devoted: she is dedicated and hardworking, respected by her peers, liked by parents and teachers, of those good teachers that parents lobby to have their children assigned to. mentioned that was coming from a meeting with the literacy consultant, who had shown me her improvement strategy on a fold-out sheet with red arrows and circles that, said, looked like battle plans for the invasion of Normandy. Miss Devoted rolled her eyes. I understand, she said. The progressives keep doing the same thing over and over, just calling it by different names. All I'm doing is going to meetings, filling out forms, getting training. My kids are struggling with substitute teachers. Here was a bright and talented teacher in a school that had failed to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), the infamous benchmark of the equally infamous 2002 No Child Left Behind law, for four consecutive years. That meant that nearly half of the school's 600 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th graders were failing to make grade-level in English and in math. Further, only 10 percent of the school's African American 8th graders (who made up 30 percent of the total) could pass the state's rudimentary math exams. Thus, a swarm of state education department consultants had descended on the school. Why won't they just let me teach? Miss Devoted asked, clearly frustrated. By all accounts, middle schools are a weak link in the chain of public education. Is it the churn of ill-conceived attempts at reform that's causing all the problems? Is it just hormones? Or is it the way in which we configure our grades? For most of the last 30 years, districts have opted to put tweens in a separate place, away from little tots and apart from the big kids. Middle schools typically serve grades 5-8 or 6-8. But do our quasi-mad preadolescents belong on an island--think Lord of the Flies--or in a big family, where even raging hormones can be mitigated by elders and self-esteem bolstered by little ones? [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Parents and educators have begun abandoning the middle school for K-8 configurations, and new research suggests that grade configuration does matter: when this age group is gathered by the hundreds and educated separately, both behavior and learning suffer. How Middle Schools Came to Be Notwithstanding all the despairing headlines middle schools seem to provoke, the more interesting story may be how they became, in relatively few years and with hardly any solid research evidence to support the idea, one of the largest and most comprehensive efforts at educational reorganization in the history of American public schooling, as researchers Paul George and Lynn Oldaker put it in 1985. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,101
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,337

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,004
Communication savante0,0070,006
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1010,035

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,228
Tête enseignante GPT0,404
Écart entre enseignants0,176 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations15
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEducation nextMême sujetEducation Methods and PracticesTravaux en français237 207