MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W635435896

Mind-wandering with and without awareness: An fMRI study of spontaneous thought processes

2006· article· en· W635435896 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Ray Smith, Kamyar Keramatian, Jonathan Smallwood, Jonathan W. Schooler, Bryan Luus, Kalina Christoff

Notice bibliographique

RevueMax Planck Digital Library · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueMind wandering and attention
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyMind-wanderingCognitive psychologyTask (project management)CognitionCognitive sciencePsychoanalysisNeuroscienceManagement
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Mind-wandering with and without Awareness: An fMRI study of spontaneous thought processes Rachelle Smith 1 (rachelle@psych.ubc.ca) Kamyar Keramatian 2 (kamyar@psych.ubc.ca) Jonathan Smallwood 1 (jsmallwood@psych.ubc.ca) Jonathan Schooler 1 (jschooler@psych.ubc.ca) Brian Luus 1 (cblm@psych.ubc.ca) Kalina Christoff ,1,2 (kchristoff@psych.ubc.ca) Department of Psychology, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4 Canada Neuroscience Program, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4 Canada research on human thought processes has focused on goal- directed thinking and problem solving, equating these processes with executive functions and thinking in general. Nonetheless, strong evidence is beginning to accumulate suggesting that spontaneously occurring thought processes share executive and cognitive mechanisms with goal- directed thought (Christoff, Ream & Gabrieli, 2004; Smallwood & Schooler, in press). Such evidence has been provided by a number of behavioral studies (Antrobus, 1968; Giambra, 1977,1979,1995; Klinger & Cox, 1987; Teasdale, Proctor, Lloyd, & Baddeley, 1993; Teasdale, Dritschel, Taylor, Proctor, Lloyd, Nimmo-Smith, et al., 1995; for review, see Christoff et al., 2004). Given these shared mechanisms, it is not surprising that the generation of spontaneous thought interferes with executive tasks. A prime example of this interference is the decreased degree of randomness in a random number generation task associated with periods of task-unrelated thoughts (Teasdale et al., 1995). A further line of evidence linking spontaneous thoughts with executive mechanisms is the parallel decline of spontaneous thoughts and executive resources with age (Giambra, 1989). This effect of decreasing spontaneous thought with increasing age has been reported across five different vigilance tasks (Giambra, 1989). In addition, there is evidence at the neural level that spontaneous thought processes share executive mechanisms with goal-directed thought. Thus, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies investigating the spontaneous cognitions present during rest are consistent with conclusions drawn on the basis of behavioural studies. These studies have found consistent rest-related activations in brain structures that support higher order cognitive functions such as long-term memory and executive processes (Binder, Frost, Hammeke, Bellgowan, Rao & Cox, 1999; Stark & Squire, 2001). These findings suggest that conceptual processes such as semantic retrieval, representation, information manipulation (Binder et al., 1999) and long term memory processes (Stark & Squire, Abstract Much of our daily mental life is occupied by spontaneous thought processes. Evidence is accumulating that such spontaneous thought processes, which are often experienced as mind-wandering, share the same cognitive and neural resources that subserve goal-directed thought. While a distinction between mind-wandering with and without awareness has been made at a cognitive level, the mechanisms underlying this distinction at a neural level remain unknown. The present study employs a novel paradigm that was designed to examine this question by directly investigating instances of mind-wandering, using fMRI. A continuously engaging background task was employed, combined with a thought sampling approach that determined whether subjects were mind-wandering at a given moment of time, and whether they were aware of where their thought processes were focused. A clear distinction between spontaneous thought processes that occurred with and without awareness emerged. Temporal lobe structures were activated during mind-wandering in the absence of awareness, while prefrontal cortex was activated when subjects were aware of their own thoughts. These findings complement recent cognitive theories of spontaneous thought, by providing evidence for neural distinction between these two kinds of mind-wandering in addition to the previously proposed cognitive distinction. As well, the results suggest that an important aspect of human thought processes, which has been largely ignored thus far, may be the spontaneous generation of thoughts in the absence of awareness or explicit conscious goals. The implications for cognitive theories of human thought are discussed. I ntroduction Much of our daily mental life is occupied by spontaneous thought processes. These thoughts, also referred to as mind- wandering, are often unrelated to the task at hand and may occur with or without our awareness. Despite the prevalence of these types of thought processes in everyday life (Klinger & Cox, 1987), their cognitive mechanisms remain largely unknown. Instead, the vast majority of

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations25
Publié2006
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMax Planck Digital LibraryMême sujetMind wandering and attentionTravaux en français237 207