So You're Considering a Red Light Camera Program? Lessons and Insights from Over a Decade of Camera Operation in South and Central Ontario
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Red light cameras are a form of automated enforcement that has been used world-wide. Six municipalities in the province of Ontario have had a program in place since November of 2000. These municipalities, in co-operation with the Ministries of the Attorney General and Transportation and the office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, have jointly developed and operated a highly successful red light camera program. The Regional Municipality of York joined the program during 2013 increasing the number of red light camera sites in operation to over 190 sites. The main objective of this paper is to provide suggestions to municipalities considering initiating a red light camera program. The suggestions are based on lessons learned in the Province of Ontario during thirteen years of operations. As is common in the world today, technological innovation has created options for red light camera operation and the paper looks at several of the key options and provides suggestions about the relative merits of current and emerging technologies. The paper considers the influence and impacts of governing legislation on technological choice. The organizational structure behind a red light camera program can be the key to public and court credibility and public acceptance. This paper discusses the regulatory and joint municipal structure in place in Ontario and comments on its advantages. The paper also discusses the common elements required to staff a program and initiate the various legal and management processes required to support a program. Site selection for a red light camera program is the primary decision affecting the success for a red light cameras program. This paper provides insights into the choice of sites for a red light camera program and how to develop a business case for a municipality which is contemplating deployment of red light cameras. Along with the internal project development, a jurisdiction will also need to consider parallel safety, signage and specific user outreach programs to maximize the likelihood of success and minimize negative input. The paper provides suggestions on how the revenue obtained by red light camera programs might be streamed toward safety programs in participating municipalities. Overall, the discussions in this paper are aimed at assisting municipalities who might be considering a red light camera process in structuring the discussion and organizing the decision-making and implementation processes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».