Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: The use of evidence-based medications for the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is low worldwide. A key strategy to improving use of medications is to understand the barriers to their use. This thesis aims to identify barriers that may influence use of these medications in high, middle, and low income countries. Data on barriers in low and middle income countries are especially lacking. We postulate that in those settings lack of availability and affordability of proven medications are key barriers to medication use. \nMethods: We initially systematically reviewed the literature on barriers to medication use. Since data on these barriers for the management of CVD are sparse, the review included studies focused on hypertension, because it is the leading risk factor for CVD. Baseline data from the PURE study were then used to investigate whether availability and affordability of medications influence their use for secondary prevention of CVD. PURE is a prospective study that recruited adults between the ages of 35 to 70 years from 17 high, middle, and low income countries. Availability and affordability of medications were documented for each country income group, and the associations between these two potential barriers and medication use was explored after accounting for other factors that may influence medication use. \nResults: The review showed that in high income countries, non-healthcare system related factors, such as lack of knowledge and motivation, were more commonly reported as barriers, whereas in low and middle income countries healthcare system factors were most commonly reported as barriers to hypertension management. However, very few studies were conducted in low and middle income countries and so there is limited information on whether availability and affordability of medications affect their use. Results from the PURE study indicate that medications recommended for the secondary prevention of CVD were often not available and when available, they were not affordable for a high proportion of individuals in low and middle income countries. Lack of availability and low affordability were strongly associated with medication use in these settings. \nConclusions: Barriers to medication use are context specific and interventions to improve use should be tailored to barriers depending on the setting. In high income countries where the medications are usually available and affordable interventions should target knowledge and motivation barriers. In low and middle income countries, the focus should be on healthcare system interventions to improve the availability and affordability of medications.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».