MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W644194118 · doi:10.1177/070674370705200206

Rebuttal: Depression is Not a Brain Disease

2007· article· en· W644194118 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joanna Moncrieff

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTreatment of Major Depression
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDepression (economics)PsychosisPsychologyPsychotic depressionPsychiatryDiseaseInternal medicineMedicineNeuroscienceClinical psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Joanna Moncrieff, MBBS, MRCPysch, MSc, MD1 (Can J Psychiatry 2007;52:100-101) Psychiatrists have been trying to construct a biological theory of depression for decades. Numerous candidates have been proposed, from noradrenalin and serotonin abnormalities to cortisol excess, hippocampal insufficiency, and neurotrophic factor. In all cases, results are inconsistent, and where abnormalities are found, they have not been shown to be specific or causal. For example, contrary to Dr Ravindran and Dr Kennedy's suggestions, the evidence on hippocampal volume is weak. Numerous studies show no difference between subjects with depression and control subjects, and I could not find studies supporting their assertion that duration of untreated illness correlates with volume reduction. In contrast, studies show that duration of treated illness predicts volume reduction.1,2 This raises the possibility that drug treatments for depression reduce brain volume in the same fashion as antipsychotics have been shown to do in patients with psychosis.3 In addition, loss of hippocampal volume is also found in first-episode psychosis4 and posttraumatic stress disorder5 and was recently shown in women diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder.6 Metabolic abnormalities sometimes found in depression are also not specific. For example, acute psychosis is also associated with increased hypothalamopituitary-adrenal axis function.7 Even if biochemical or structural abnormalities were found to be associated with depression, this would not imply that they were causal. If I experience an adverse event, I will feel sad, and if this emotion is strong enough, there are likely to be associated biochemical changes-but it is the event that has made me sad, not the chemical fluctuations. They are best viewed as an accompaniment, or a biological correlation, of the emotional state. In my first piece, I concentrated on placebo-controlled studies because it is difficult to show any real-world benefits from the use of antidepressants. In fact, their increased use is associated with increasing prevalence and duration of depressive episodes. The naturalistic Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression trial found remission rates that are unimpressive in a naturally remitting condition, although the fact that this study did not include a placebo group means this valuable opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of antidepressants was wasted.8 The study on absence due to sickness quoted by Ravindran and Kennedy actually found that individuals treated with antidepressants were less likely to return to work than those who were not treated with them (P Findings that patients who comply with optimal or adequate dosages do better than those who do not probably reflect the fact that individuals who comply with any treatment, including placebo, have better outcomes than those who do not.10 The study of quality of life was a discontinuation study that demonstrated a deterioration in individuals who had improved on drug treatment and were then randomized to placebo. As such, it provides no information on the benefits of antidepressants when they are compared with prospectively started placebo treatment.11 We do indeed live in an age characterized by an epidemic of psychological disorders.12, p 40 However, the mass prescribing of antidepressants and the concomitant message that depression is a brain disease have helped to create this situation, not to improve it. By persuading people that their thoughts and feelings originate from a biological defect, we are preventing them from finding real solutions to the complex problems of modern living. References 1. MacQueen GM, Campbell S, McEwen BS, et al. Course of illness, hippocampal function, and hippocampal volume in major depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(3):1387-1392. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,131

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,025
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,007
Communication savante0,0040,009
Science ouverte0,0060,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0230,041
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0390,051

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Canadian Journal of PsychiatryMême sujetTreatment of Major DepressionTravaux en français237 207