MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6637570 · doi:10.26481/dis.20130517rb

Impacts of government incentives to R&D, innovation and productivity : a microeconometric analysis of the Québec case

2013· dissertation· en· W6637570 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Rufin Baghana

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueInnovation Policy and R&D
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesAustralian GovernmentUniversité de Sherbrooke
Mots-clésFavouriteFeelingIncentiveProductivityGovernment (linguistics)Media studiesPolitical scienceSociologyEngineeringPsychologyLawEconomicsSocial psychologyEconomic growthMarket economyPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

There is a popular proverb that says, "No matter how long the night is, the morning is sure to come."As I conclude this thesis, I would like to send these encouraging words to all those who are in the course of writing their theses, and especially to those who are still at the beginning of this process.It is true that, as the saying goes, this process can be very lonely.Working on this project will remain a memorable accomplishment for me, because each day represented a huge challenge, especially due to the need to reconcile family, work and thesis writing.The joys, sorrows and feelings of discouragement were confronted with the vicissitudes of this long desert crossing.There is a great bench of people behind this work, and I would like to thank them all from the bottom of my heart.First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Pierre Mohnen, who supported me over the years and gave me so much freedom to explore and discover new areas.Pierre, I would like to stress how much I enjoyed the way you have guided me through this research project.I was able to take advantage of your experience and availability, and these are capital elements when carrying out such a project.I don't think this is news to anyone who has already written a doctoral thesis.Since you were one of my favourite teachers during my master's studies at the University of Québec in Montreal, it was very easy for me to decide to come to Maastricht to complete my thesis.I would also like to highlight the contribution of Pierre Mohnen as co-author of a chapter in this thesis that was published as "Effectiveness of R&D Tax Incentives in Small and Large Enterprises in Québec" in the journal Small business economics ((2009) 33:91-107).I also thank the Institut de la Statistique du Québec (ISQ).Indeed, this thesis would not have been possible without the ISQ which provided me with access to the databases used in this project.This was a major challenge because most data was dictated by rules of strict confidentiality.To override this restriction, the ISQ had to make arrangements to allow access to the data while complying with federal and provincial rules and obtaining approval from both governments.Moreover, in addition to legal issues, there were all the difficulties related to data preparation, particularly with matching large and complex databases from different sources.Here again, I was able to benefit from the resources and expertise of the ISQ, and so, I want to thank any staff member at ISQ who, directly or indirectly, helped me in the various stages of this project.In this regard, I would especially like to thank Brigitte Poussart from the Science, Technology and Innovation team, whose contribution was crucial to the accomplishment of this project.She accompanied me through the long process to obtain authorizations from provincial and federal ii authorities to access the data.In addition to the logistical support, I also benefited from her knowledge and expertise, in particular, regarding the data sources used in this project and the creation of the final database.A thank you to Brigitte also for her meticulous proofreading and suggestions.Brigitte, I owe you one, and I am forever grateful for your contribution to this project.I would also like to thank other members of the Science, Technology

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: Incitatifs · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,998
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,407

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0040,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
DomaineIncitatifs
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetInnovation Policy and R&DTravaux en français237 207