MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W68693084 · doi:10.1353/ths.2012.0019

Enacting History ed. by Scott Magelssen and Rhona Justice-Malloy (review)

2012· article· en· W68693084 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Scott R. Irelan

Notice bibliographique

RevueTheatre history studies · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePhilippine History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBattleWitnessEconomic JusticeConversationNarrativeHonorSociologyTRACE (psycholinguistics)HistoryArt historyMedia studiesAestheticsArtLawLiteraturePolitical sciencePhilosophyArchaeologyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Enacting History ed. by Scott Magelssen and Rhona Justice-Malloy Scott R. Irelan Enacting History. Edited by Scott Magelssen and Rhona Justice-Malloy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2011. 240 pp. + 10 illustrations. $19.96 e-book, $24.95 paperback. These ten essays clearly trace "ways recent performance practices have been used to select, devise and perform narratives of the past to their participants and audiences" (1). Rather than attempting an all-inclusive collection, the editors have done well to choose a short list of contributors who deftly tease out "the contours of contemporary performance practices that bear witness to a moment or a set of moments of the past, whether actual or imagined" (3). From this approach emerges a focused, sophisticated "conversation about the kinds of knowledge these performances do a good job of producing, even if the jury is still out on whether the knowledge they produce is beneficial to all parties" (5). In "Present Enacting Past: The Functions of Battle Reenacting in Historical Representation," Leigh Clemons suggests that the Battle of Coleto Creek/ [End Page 213] Goliad Massacre reenactment and the alleged Texas history on display "are trapped together in a symbiotic relationship of progressive clarification and determination" (10) with the primary goal being commemoration rather than "authentic" re-creation. Dealing, too, with powerful sites of remembrance, Lindsay Adamson Livingston explores Mormon cultural memory and the production of space both in Palmyra, New York, and Nauvoo, Illinois. She argues that spatial or embodied performances found here work to connect tourist-spectators to a site via "echoes of events and personalities associated with the spaces" (37). Equally, "Tourist Performance in the Twenty-first Century" recounts Scott Magelssen's experience as an "illegal migrant" in Parque EcoAlberto's Caminata Nocturna. He asserts that by "participating bodily in tourist performances that invite visitors to take on the personae of those who have been made abject by violent or oppressive forces," tourist-performers construct embodied knowing beyond that of print sources (175). Magelssen does concede, though, that considerable slippage "is found between the meanings intended by the producing bodies" and "the bodies that perform them" (175). Taken together, these three glimpses into the complexities of constructing both public memory and communal identity—national, religious, ethnic, or otherwise—are quite absorbing. Amy M. Tyson, Aili McGill, and Catherine Hughes offer fresh perspectives on historiographic performance. Tyson, writing as a participant-observer at Historic Fort Snelling in St. Paul, Minnesota, analyzes "quality control" practices at the site in order to get at the "hives of subtlety that surround how enacting history affects workers' subjectivities" (47). She finds that gendered "authenticity" encourages a "culture of surveillance wherein co workers monitored one another's behavior" both in the past and present (61). McGill's "Defining Museum Theatre at Conner Prairie" turns from institutional policing of "authenticity" to creating successful guest experiences that not only "inspire creativity and foster learning" (91) but also include "emotional engagement, artful story development, and skilled character development and interaction" not always in use with first-person interpretation events (110). Encompassing both notions of "authenticity" and affective response, Hughes uses reception study data to propose that a "sense of realness can emerge" from theatrical performance at places like the Kentucky History Center and the Museum of Science, Boston, particularly when "the spectator is invited into the play frame" (149). The ways that these authors discuss institutional approaches to enacting history point to intricate layers of connection for both workers and guests as they seek a present connection with a past community. Richard Poole uses "History, Archive, Memory, and Performance: The Lewis [End Page 214] and Clark Bicentennial Play as Cultural Commemoration" to remind readers that dramatizing history "offers considerable challenges, among them many possible interpretations of history" (81). Although Poole's analysis does not always offer novel findings, the way he queries his decision-making processes as writer/ director/producer forms a telling case study. Patricia Ybarra also handles issues of commemoration and re-membering. Using her experience as director for . . . And Jesus Moonwalks the Mississippi, she contends that the production's inherent "performance of difficult history" regarding slavery (117) "produced a necessary supplement not only to dialogue but...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,259
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,967

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,061
Tête enseignante GPT0,315
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTheatre history studiesMême sujetPhilippine History and CultureTravaux en français237 207