High-Pressure\nOxy-Firing (HiPrOx) of Fuels with Water\nfor the Purpose of Direct Contact Steam Generation
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
High-pressure\noxy-fired direct contact steam generation (HiPrOx/DCSG)\ncan be achieved by the oxy-combustion of fuels in the presence of\nwater. This process is capable of producing flue gas streams containing\napproximately 90% steam with a balance of primarily CO<sub>2</sub>. The product flue gas is suitable for processes where the purity\nof the steam is less important, such as the steam-assisted gravity\ndrainage process used for <i>in situ</i> production of bitumen\nwithin the Canadian oil sands. This study had three primary objectives:\n(1) To show that high-moisture HiPrOx/DCSG can be achieved with hydrocarbon\nfuels. For this purpose, <i>n</i>-butanol was used because\nof its high volatility and ease of handling. (2) To see if this technology\ncould be applied to fuels with lower volatilities. This was studied\nby attempting to combust a graphite–water slurry as well as\nmixtures of graphite–water slurry and butanol. (3) To determine\nthe effects of different fuel mixtures, oxygen-to-fuel ratios, and\nwater inputs on process stability and H<sub>2</sub>O partial pressure\nin the product gas. This paper describes pilot-scale combustion testing\nand process modeling of <i>n</i>-butanol, graphite–water\nslurry, and their mixtures in an atmosphere consisting of oxygen and\nwater at a pressure of 1.5 MPa(g). Graphite/butanol mixtures were\nselected because certain combinations could represent the range of\nfixed carbon/volatiles ratios of waste fuels and indicate whether\nlow-volatile fuels will ignite in the high-water moderator environment.\nOver the butanol test periods, a steam content of around 90 mol %\nat saturation was achievable; the O<sub>2</sub> in the combustion\nproducts was between 0.08 and 3.57 mol % (wet) with an average of\n1.13 mol % (wet). The CO emissions were low (<25 ppmv wet, 3% O<sub>2</sub>) in the combustor. The CO levels indicated that high fuel\nconversion was achieved with low excess O<sub>2</sub> content in the\ncombustion products. The testing also indicated that operation with\nextremely low O<sub>2</sub> is possible for specific fuels, which\nwill minimize downstream corrosion issues and reduce the energy consumption\nand costs associated with oxygen production requirements. Low CO emissions\n(<25 ppmv wet, 3% O<sub>2</sub>) and relatively good process stability\nwere experienced for the butanol/graphite–water slurry mixtures\ncontaining ∼40% butanol. CO emissions increased and process\nstability decreased as the graphite content in the fuel mixture was\nincreased. Unassisted combustion of the graphite–water slurry\nwas achieved for a period of 20 minutes until operational problems\nwere encountered, due to burner plugging by the slurry, requiring\nthat the burner be shut off. It was found that the maximum attainable\nH<sub>2</sub>O content in the product gas increased with increasing\nhydrogen-to-carbon ratio in the fuel. H<sub>2</sub>O content was around\n80 mol % with 100% graphite–water slurry, 81 mol % with a 25%\nbutanol in graphite–water slurry mixture, and around 86.5%\nin a 40% butanol in graphite–water slurry mixture. It was also\nfound that the fuel H/C ratio, excess O<sub>2</sub>, heat loss, O<sub>2</sub> purity, and fuel volatility are important parameters when\nconsidering a DCSG system because they directly affect the process\nperformance and quality of the desired product.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle