Clinical Leadership Development Workshops for Licensed Practical Nurses in Supported Living in Alberta: An Exploratory Qualitative study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aim: This study had three aims: 1) to develop and deliver a clinical leadership development (CLD) workshop for licensed practical nurses (LPNs) who work in supported living (SL) contexts; 2) to explore LPN participants’ experiences, as well as the influence of the workshop on their attitudes, knowledge, and skills; and 3) to explore the feasibility of implementing a work-based CLD workshop for LPNs working in SL in Alberta. Background: Effective clinical leaders create an efficient and caring work environment, resulting in quality care for patients that attend to both their physical (e.g., safety) and psychological (e.g., autonomy) needs. In SL in Alberta, nursing care is primarily undertaken by LPNs, who work with both registered nurses (RN) and health care aides (HCA) in delivering quality care to older adults. As a result, LPNs are required to undertake clinical leadership (CL) roles that they are often under-prepared for. CL requires the development of a new set of skills for LPNs. To date, few resources have been devoted to developing educational programs to teach these skills, particularly in relation to work-based learning. This program addressed the issue of improving LPNs’ CL skills by developing and delivering a work-based CLD workshop. Design: An exploratory qualitative design was used, incorporating multiple data collection methods, including individual and focus group interviews, a demographic questionnaire, and a knowledge questionnaire. Interview data were analyzed using thematic description and the knowledge questionnaire data were statistically analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Result: The themes were captured in the findings: exploring and raising awareness of the LPNs role as a clinical leader; a sense of empowerment for LPNs in their role as clinical leader; the influence of the CLD workshop on teamwork and communication; and feasibility’s facilitators and challenges. The data affirmed the need for developing a program to help LPNs improve their CL skills, and understand and undertake their CL roles and responsibilities. The effectiveness of the CLD workshop was demonstrated through the LPN participants’ increased confidence, autonomy, and perceived control over decision-making. Following the workshop, the participants expressed a sense of empowerment, which resulted in changed attitudes about their capacity and their role. Conclusion: This study has shown the importance of LPNs understanding their role as a clinical leader, developing effective communication skills, and establishing a working relationship with and among their staff; it has also shown the significance of empowering LPNs. Limitations of the study included challenges arranging and scheduling the necessary time for LPNs to attend CLD workshop, availability and sustainability of the CL training for new staff, and refresher training for the existing staff.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».