Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The thesis is a concert of seven original musical compositions presented in the Recital Hall of the U.B.C. School of Music on February 18, 1990. NON TI RICORDl NON TI RICORDl was written for a sextet of clarinet, two percussionists, piano, violin, and cello, and is an exploration of the vast timbral possibilities of this heterogenous ensemble. In visual arts, colours are mixed, juxtaposed, and isolated; similarly, in NON TI RICORDl the timbres of the individual instruments and combinations of instruments are used to emphasize the form and highlight important points in the piece. The title, which means "I don't remember you", is taken from a painting by Francesco Clemente. The painting contains the bust of a man who, from the chin up, is transformed into a mountain. In keeping with the metamorphosis in the painting, the motive of NON TI RICORDl is stated virtually unchanged throughout the first six minutes of the piece (despite the continuous rhythmic and timbral development), after which it is gradually transformed, until no longer recognizable, in the concluding two minutes. STIPE STIPE means tree trunk, and is my representation of the strength and density of construction that is seen when examining the trunk of a healthy tree. The short chords which punctuate the silence of the opening form a harmonic cycle in which the intervals of the chords expand outward, much like the age-rings of a tree. Each successive section of the piece is a cyclic, ordered progression through one of the harmonies stated in the introduction. On a more local level, an important element of the work is gestural similarity -a quick flourish at the outset is the basis of all subsequent melodic material, often developed through registral expansion. STIPE won first prize in the 1989 Vancouver New Music Society Competition for Young Composers, and was premiered on their concert "WORKS- RECENT DISCOVERIES". WIRE Manipulations of natural sound sources form the majority of the material for this electroacoustic composition. Breaking glass, squeaking bicycle brakes, fireworks, wooden blocks, and rain are just a few of the sounds that were transformed by altering their length, pitch, volume, and envelope. Multiple layers of these timbres were combined with sounds generated on synthesizers to create an exciting and colourful sound world. With its use of both analog and digital synthesizers, musique concrete techniques, digital sampling, and sound sculpting, WIRE can be seen as an overview of many of the techniques utilized in electroacoustic music since its origin in France in the 1940's. This eleven-minute work was composed in the University of British Columbia's Electroacoustic Music Studio. TWO RIVERS The initial inspiration for this seven-minute piece for chamber choir was the choral music of my former composition teacher, Dr. Stephen Chatman. The piece begins in the conservative tonal language found in much of his choral music, but through the addition of clashing tones, becomes non-tonal. Throughout the work one can hear a smooth movement between these seemingly disparate approaches, and at times the traditional textures coexists with the more chaotic textures. Overall, however, there is a gradual transformation from a clearly contrapuntal area to one of aleatoric sound blocks. TWO RIVERS won first prize in the choral category of the 1989 Performing Rights Organization of Canada's Competition for Young Composers. AMARANTH This four-movement work for solo cello is the longest piece on the program, lasting sixteen minutes. Each movement concentrates on a different form of the pitch-motive and explores one of the many extended techniques possible on the instrument, such as multiple-stops, pizzicato, sul ponticello, and col legno. The title refers to an imaginary flower that never fades away. This idea is represented in the music by the frequent reference to the primary melodic motive. As well, each movement (Ka, Golden Wave, Elatum, and Nova) is named after a flower which blooms in one season. The complete cycle represents one year of continuous presence and growth. DEEP MOUNTAIN DEEP MOUNTAIN is a twelve-minute electroacoustic work, and is the result of my study of computer applications to music with Dr. Keith Hamel. One of the topics covered was sound synthesis, more specifically the generation of complex sounds from a personal computer. Procedures for the synthesis of these sounds were written in the Object Logo programming language. After being generated, the sounds were then transferred digitally to a sampler, after which I began composing the piece. Using multi-track recording equipment, synthesized sounds from a Macintosh computer, and a number of environmental sounds, DEEP MOUNTAIN was composed in the Electroacoustic Music Studio at the University of British Columbia. It was a selected work in the 17th International Electroacoustic Music Competition in Bourges, France. THRESHOLDS When composing THRESHOLDS (written for two horns, four trumpets, two trombones, bass trombone, tuba, and two pianos), two compositional elements were at the forefront of my technical concerns. The first was to approach the work from a cinematic standpoint- the pitches would be organized in a recognizable, coherent manner, yet the textures and moods would change quite rapidly, much like the quick cuts and changes of scene one finds in films. The other important factor in this work was my desire to control strictly the emphasis which was to be placed on certain notes- even though there would be a high number of pitches present throughout most of the piece, the function of each pitch would be clearly defined. With such a powerful ensemble, doubling two or more instruments on a single pitch or rhythm can very subtly draw attention to one line, placing others in the background and thus creating a hierarchy within the ensemble. The aural result is seven minutes of multi-levelled, harmonically rich and dynamic music which enables the ensemble to display its virtuosity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,489 | 0,308 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».