The effects of mycorrhizal plant-soil feedbacks on plant evenness in US forests
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Plant-soil feedbacks (PSFs) mediated by mycorrhizal fungi are thought to influence plant community and structure in a variety of ways. Specifically, it has been hypothesized that EcM fungi protect their hosts from conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD)[1]. CNDD is thought to prevent dominance by any one species through the accumulation of antagonists when a species is abundant.[2] As a result, the dominant species may suffer reduced fitness, which would prevent competitive exclusion of less-dominant species by the more-dominant species. Therefore, CNDD is a mechanism that may help maintain richness and evenness in natural ecosystems. If EcM fungi do provide their hosts with protection against CNDD, then we would expect that EcM host-dominated communities should have lower evenness compared to AM host-dominated communities (the “EcM dominance hypothesis”)*. Contrary to these expectations, a recent study of forests in the US did not support their hypothesis that AM host-dominated forests would have higher plant diversity than EcM host-dominated forests. [3] Instead, they found that forest plots with roughly 50% of each mycorrhizal host type showed the greatest diversity, even after accounting for the fact that plots with both host types would also have the greatest pool of potential species. The authors proposed a “mycorrhizal dominance hypothesis” to explain this pattern. However, in most temperate forests, the majority of plant diversity resides in the herbaceous and shrub plants of the ground layer, and studies have shown a potential for tree and ground plants to interact through common mycorrhizal networks [4]. Our goal therefore is to investigate the influence of dominance of host mycorrhizal type on plant species evenness in both the tree and ground layers in US forests. *While other studies have also considered richness in response to the proportion of EcM hosts, it is possible that increased cover by one host mycorrhizal type could increase the richness of the associated fungal community, which could facilitate the recruitment/establishment of a greater diversity of hosts, thereby increasing plant species richness. These hypotheses yield similar predictions and are thus not easy to disentangle, therefore we are choosing to focus solely on evenness in our analyses. However, summary statistics of richness and diversity indices will be included in an appendix.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,009 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».