Long-Term Utilization of Rehabilitation-Related Healthcare Services Post-Stroke - A Scoping Review protocol
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Healthcare services play a key role in mitigating the long-term multidimensional physical and functional disabilities caused by stroke. Extensive healthcare resources are directed at immediate rehabilitation after the event. Yet, medical and rehabilitative services in the chronic phase are inadequately structured, and stroke survivors in the community report feeling abandoned by the healthcare system. Long-term utilization patterns of healthcare services by people post-stroke are unknown. Research Questions: The purpose of this study is to map the existing body of evidence about long-term utilization of rehabilitation-related healthcare services post-stroke and describe rates of utilization. The specific questions are: 1. What frameworks and contexts exist in the literature documenting long-term healthcare utilization post-stroke? 2. What are the characteristics of the sources of knowledge utilized to study long-term post-stroke service utilization, including: participant characteristics, data sources (e.g. surveys), and countries studied? 3. What approaches are used to monitor and evaluate long-term post-stroke service utilization, including timepoints of assessment, and units used to quantify utilization (e.g. number of visits, hours of services)? 4. What does the literature report about the extent, dose, or rate of utilization of the following rehabilitation services long-term post-stroke: physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, neurology, and physiatry? Methods: Two independent reviewers will search the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for peer-reviewed and gray literature publications from 2010 to 2023. We will include studies published between 2010 and 2023, involving individuals post-stroke who reported utilizing at least one medical or rehabilitative service related to stroke (such as neurology, physiatry, physical therapy, occupational therapy, or speech and language therapy) at least once during the chronic phase (>6 months). We will iteratively develop charting tables to extract pertinent information. Data will be extracted and quality appraisal of the reviewed papers will be conducted by two reviewers according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. After extracting the data, we will outline the key findings and offer a comprehensive interpretation of the results in relation to the review questions, along with potential implications for research and health policy. Lastly, we will discuss the constraints of our scoping review process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle