Associations between predictor variables and mental health difficulties among autistic and non-autistic UK undergraduate students
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The transition to university occurs during a critical developmental period in which young people are expected to separate from their homes and assume greater responsibility for their daily lives. During this time, there is rapid cognitive development, changing interpersonal and sexual relationships, burgeoning professional responsibilities, and increasing susceptibility to stress (Chung & Hudziak, 2017). Duffy et al., (2019) indicated that the transition to university is a high-risk period of life for the onset of mental health problems, but it also provides an important chance for effective prevention. However, based on a report from higher education institutions in the UK, there is a significant gap between the growing demand for university student mental health support and the services available (Thorley, 2017). Duffy et al., (2020) identified distal and proximal risk factors for mental health problems and academic outcomes in first-year university students. According to their conceptual model, distal risk factors include a family history of mental health problems and early adversity (neglect, trauma, and abuse). Proximal risk factors consist of sleep problems, substance use, lack of social support and exercise, low self-esteem, and a high amount of perceived stress. These risk factors have been associated with anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation among first-year students, while early adversity was associated with lower cumulative grades. Little is known about the experiences and outcomes for autistic undergraduates. There is clear evidence that autistic individuals experience more co-occurring mental health problems than the general population (Ameis & Szatmari, 2015; Lai et al., 2019). Considering the challenges faced by university students generally, autistic undergraduates may present with additional risk factors (e.g., COVID-19) that are associated with poorer mental health outcomes. Few studies have been conducted among autistic university students to explore mental health problems, and only one has taken place in the UK (Gurbuz et al., 2019), with another in the USA (Jackson et al., 2018), and another in Canada (McMorris et al., 2019). Their focus was received support, social and academic experiences (Gurbuz et al., 2019), mental health, academic and social experiences (Jackson et al., 2018), and mental health problems and utilisation of service use (McMorris et al., 2019). While having included small samples of autistic students, the authors pointed to increased mental health problems among autistic university students compared to those without autism. However, these studies did not explore how various factors may relate to mental health problems among autistic students. As a consequence, there is a significant knowledge gap about the mental health trajectories of autistic and non-autistic undergraduates, how they may differ, and what factors may explain any difference. Further, to date, only a single study has been conducted that examined gender differences in mental health problems among autistic individuals, not specifically university students, (Sedgwick et al., 2021) which warrants further exploration. Therefore, the current research study will explore the relationships between a series of hypothesised predictors and mental health problems (anxiety, depression, and suicidality) among undergraduate autistic and non-autistic students using a cross-sectional and longitudinal design. Gender differences will also be examined between autistic and non-autistic undergraduates.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle