MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6888465813 · doi:10.20381/ruor-30555

The Second Sexual Revolution? : Baby Boomer Women and Their Changing Sexuality Needs in Later Life Decades and in Long-Term Care

2024· article· en· W6888465813 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Ottawa - Library · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueElder Abuse and Neglect
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHuman sexualityBaby boomersPerceptionQualitative researchLife course approachState (computer science)Speculation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As one of the largest generational cohorts in history, the baby boomer generation is viewed as having significantly upended societal conceptualizations of aging and what it means to become "old". It has also been suggested that baby boomers differ significantly from previous generations in how they experience their sexuality. There has been much speculation in the literature that baby boomers will expect to maintain their sexuality well into later life and will persist in their refusal to buy into societal standards of aging, including those pertaining to sexual expression. Yet, to date, little is actually known about their experience of sexuality over their lifetime, including their expectations for sexuality in the future and within the long-term care context. Given that women tend to live longer than men and are less likely to have access to informal care services, the largest consumers of these services will be women. It is important that their voices be heard. The studies in this dissertation contribute positively to existing knowledge. First, by reporting on mid-life women's perceptions and expectations regarding their sexuality, and, second, by eliciting the attitudes and opinions of Ontario's long-term care (LTC) administrators regarding the current and perceived future state of LTC with regard to supports and impediments to residents' sexuality. The first study of this dissertation adopted a qualitative approach and was comprised of 24 women aged 54 to 65 years. Participants' perceptions of their sexuality were varied, involved a number of interrelated variables, and were commonly understood to develop over time in response to changing life circumstances. Descriptions of sexuality moved beyond traditional conceptualizations of specific sexual behaviours to include aspects of body image and body awareness, as well as personal and relational features. The possibility of having to transition to LTC to meet one's later life needs was not a popular prospect and participants perceived numerous barriers to continued sexuality within this context. Many participants were uncertain about the availability of supports; however, some were optimistic they would be made available when needed. This knowledge strengthens previous assertions that existing policies and procedures will not be sufficient to meet the expectations and demands of the next generation of LTC residents. The second study of this dissertation was a survey study of 150 long-term care LTC administrators/Directors of Care. It investigated their attitudes and opinions regarding the preparedness of Ontario's aged-care facilities to meet the sexuality and intimacy needs of the next generation of residents-baby boomers. Our findings show that although they are quite knowledgeable regarding late-life sexuality, many LTC administrators hold the opinion that, as it stands, their facility is unprepared to respond to residents' changing needs and expectations. The findings of this dissertation have important implications for practice and policy development, healthcare curriculum and staff training, community level interventions, and for the sexual health outcomes of aging women.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,060
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,326

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Ottawa - LibraryMême sujetElder Abuse and NeglectTravaux en français237 207