Neglecting the Essentials: Addressing Barriers to Accessing Off-Patent Essential Medicines for Neglected Diseases in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Canada, less than half of the drugs that the World Health Organization classifies as Essential Medicines for the treatment of Neglected Diseases like Chagas disease, drug-resistant tuberculosis, echinococcosis, leishmaniasis, leprosy, malaria and sleeping sickness are formally available, even as collectively hundreds of patients require access to them each year. Essential Medicines, according to the WHO, are those “intended to be available within the context of functioning health systems at all times in adequate amounts, in the appropriate dosage forms, with assured quality, and at a price the individual and the community can afford”. Nevertheless, many of these Essential Medicines, like the conditions they treat, are neglected by pharmaceutical companies and governments alike in low-burden, high-income countries like Canada. The result is a reversal of the usual access to medicines narrative around novel, patented medicines unavailable in low-income countries; these are old, off-patent Essential Medicines, many of which have become widely available in low and middle-income countries yet increasingly difficult to access in many high-income countries. Their absence from countries like Canada is not due to their lack of medical utility – many of them are recognized domestically as the standard of care – but their lack of commercial value. Unfortunately, Canada’s regulatory system is premised upon keeping unsafe, ineffective or poor-quality drugs out, not bringing Essential Medicines in. As a result, these drugs must be accessed through ill-fitting mechanisms like Canada’s Special Access Programme (SAP). Other high-income countries face similar access challenges, though they may manifest in different ways; in the United States for instance, drugs that have disappeared from the Canadian market or simply never been introduced in the first place have instead had de facto monopolies unscrupulously exploited. In turn, as the COVID-19 pandemic has served to underscore, access to these Essential Medicines for Neglected Diseases is an issue that cannot be solved solely at the domestic level. Essential Medicines that threaten to disappear before the diseases they treat do also serve to highlight broader issues of domestic and international concern, from drug shortages to antimicrobial resistance. This thesis provides an in-depth exploration of the problem, and offers guidance on what Canada in particular can do about improving access to medicines, especially those for Neglected Diseases that have been largely absent from the Canadian pharmaceutical agenda.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,032 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,035 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».