MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6889651846 · doi:10.25904/1912/4644

Connectivity Conservation: forging the nexus between biodiversity protection and climate action in Australia

2023· other· en· W6889651846 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueGriffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia) · 2023
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiodiversityConvention on Biological DiversityNexus (standard)Action planClimate changeEcosystem servicesEcosystemGreenhouse gas

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purpose of this policy discussion paper is to provide a summary of the importance of connectivity conservation for protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems in Australia, including supporting Australia’s response to climate change. It also provides guidance on the implications of connectivity for Australia’s national biodiversity plan and related policy areas. Key points include: 1. Maintaining and enhancing ecosystem integrity and resilience through connectivity is a key element in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework adopted at CBD COP15. Goal A and Targets 2, 3 & 12 explicitly recognise the importance of ecological connectivity for achieving biodiversity objectives. 2. Decisions taken by the UNFCCC at COPs 25, 26 and 27 reinforce the importance of integrating climate and biodiversity action for climate mitigation and ensuring ecosystem integrity. Protecting and restoring ecosystem integrity is an essential pre-requisite for the success of Australia’s commitments under the Convention on Biodiversity and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. 3. Connectivity conservation is also critical for achieving Australia’s national biodiversity plan and meeting Australia’s new goals of 30 by 30, preventing new extinctions and 43% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 leading to net zero by 2050. 4. All natural ecosystems, and especially carbon dense ecosystems such as native forests, are the only means by which carbon can be removed from the atmosphere and accumulate in relatively stable long term, ecosystem carbon stores. Protecting these ecosystems therefore has significant mitigation benefit by preventing anthropogenic emissions and enabling ongoing removals through natural growth. 5. ‘Conservation corridors’ provide a framework for conservation planning and implementation efforts informed by connectivity conservation and characterised by a whole-of-landscape approach, the integration of protection and restoration actions, partnerships within and between sectors, and coordination of actions across tenures and jurisdictions. In Australia, conservation corridors are in the main community-led in partnership with governments and NGOs, Traditional Owners and cognate enterprises. 6. Community based connectivity conservation initiatives provide important vehicles for building partnerships within and across sectors and for the whole-of-landscape and system approach needed to address the multiple and interacting threats of habitat fragmentation, loss and damage, invasive species, and climate change. 7. Australia has been culturally connected for millennia by Songlines and other culturally significant pathways including trade routes, that remain of great importance to First Nations people, and are a living part of Australia’s cultural heritage. Restoration of these can be an important element in strengthening connection to culture and country. 8. A national system of conservation corridors, with protected areas as the cornerstones, would provide the foundation for enabling strategic, community-led connectivity initiatives that combine to create impact at the regional and continental scales. 9. This new national system could be implemented through a National Conservation Corridors Framework in support of the Australian Government’s National Climate Resilience and Adaptation Strategy to ensure respectful, considered and meaningful consultation with stakeholders, and support the roll-out of integrated nature-based solutions – those based on native ecosystems – that address our climate, biodiversity, climate resilient development and health challenges. 10. Conservation corridors help preserve Australia’s unique species and ecosystems, maintain and restore the ecological integrity, resilience and adaptive capacity of our landscapes, waterways and seascapes and mitigate the impacts of climate change by: • Promoting coordinated, multi-scale biodiversity outcomes across tenures (public, private, leasehold, Indigenous) • Addressing the major threats to biodiversity which cascade and compound across tenures. • Maintaining and improving ecosystem carbon sequestration and storage and water quality through improved conservation management, increased protection and encouraging assisted natural regeneration in degraded landscapes. • Strengthening the population viability and resilience of wildlife, particularly threatened species through maintaining critical habitat , including source habitats and refugia, and movement pathways, on all tenures. • Supporting the natural adaptative response of species to climate change, including supporting dispersal to new locations providing suitable habitat. • Maintaining the ecological processes that sustain ecosystem integrity, including long distance species migration and transfer of pollen and plant propagules between otherwise disconnected areas. • Supporting biodiversity recovery following mega-disturbances. • Contributing to climate resilient development, and • Improving community health, wellbeing and resilience. 11. Robust, targeted and ongoing research is needed – including monitoring and evaluation of ecosystem condition – to support the adaptive management now needed in the face of a rapidly changing climate and other pressures and threatening processes. 12. There are important social and cultural benefits arising from the approach, including building capacity among local communities as well as creating awareness of the benefits from and threats to a healthy environment, and helping cultivate the social mandate in support of strong biodiversity and climate action.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,107
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,212

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,004
Communication savante0,0040,008
Science ouverte0,0010,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,360
Tête enseignante GPT0,416
Écart entre enseignants0,056 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGriffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)Travaux en français237 207