MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6889669510 · doi:10.25959/23246744.v2

The role of complementary and alternative medicines in the management of osteoarthritis

2022· dissertation· en· W6889669510 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueUTAS Research Repository · 2022
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAlternative medicineMedical prescriptionOsteoarthritisDiseaseCohortPopulationPharmaceutical Benefits SchemePublic health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a serious disease and a major public health challenge, affecting mainly older adults and the obese population. Despite its enormous disease burden, no approved disease-modifying drugs are available to treat OA. Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) are increasingly used in OA treatment with very little evidence of their efficacy. They are generally considered safe and may be an alternative option for OA patients who often have comorbidities and contraindications to modern pharmacological therapies. Aiming to widen the evidence base for CAMs use among OA patients, this thesis investigated the prevalence of the use of CAMs in the Tasmanian population and tested the efficacy of Curcuma longa extract (CL) and vitamin D for the management of knee OA.In Chapter 4, we first explored the prevalence and correlates of CAM medication use among older adults utilising data from the Tasmania Older Adult Cohort Study (TASOAC, n=1099). Participants aged between 50 and 80 years were selected randomly from the electoral roll in southern Tasmania (total population: n=229,000). Participants were asked to bring all their over-the-counter and prescription medications to the clinic visit and complete a questionnaire with assistance from the research nurse. Correlates of CAM medication use were assessed by comparing CAM medication users and non-users. We found that CAM medications were commonly used among Tasmanian older adults, with 35% of the population using CAM medications either alone or with conventional analgesics. CAM medication users were more likely to be females, better educated, had more joints with OA, and had healthier lifestyles.In Chapter 5, we conducted a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (CurKOA trial registered in ANZCTR: ACTRN12618000080224) to determine the efficacy of CL for reducing knee symptoms and effusion-synovitis in patients with symptomatic knee OA and knee effusion-synovitis. Seventy participants with symptomatic knee OA and ultrasound-defined effusion-synovitis were included and given two capsules per day of CL (n=36) or matched placebo (n=34) for 12 weeks. Two primary outcomes were changes in knee visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, and effusion-synovitis volume on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The key secondary outcomes were change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and cartilage composition values. We found that CL improved VAS pain compared to placebo by -9.1mm but did not change effusion-synovitis volume. CL also improved WOMAC knee pain, but not lateral femoral cartilage T2 relaxation time. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the CL (n=14 (39%)) and placebo (n=18 (53%)) groups.CL was shown to be modestly effective for relieving knee symptoms in knee OA patients; however, the mechanism of action is unclear. In Chapter 6, we aimed to determine the effects of CL treatment on serum inflammatory markers over 12 weeks and to explore its potential effects on synovitis assessed by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) of the knee. Systemic inflammatory markers (TNF-α, and hs-CRP) and cartilage marker (MMP-3) were measured at baseline and 12-week follow-up. We conducted a sub-study to the CurKOA trial and performed secondary analyses. A subgroup of participants (CL, n=7; placebo, n=5) underwent CE-MRI at baseline and a 12-week follow-up for assessing synovitis. Over 12 weeks, there were no between-group differences in change in hs-CRP, IL-6 levels, and TNF-α. MMP-3 levels decreased in both the CL and placebo groups, with a slightly greater decrease in the placebo group. Synovitis status remained stable for all except two participants, one each in the CL and placebo group, whose synovitis score increased. There was no clinically significant effect of CL treatment on systemic (inflammatory and cartilage) or local synovitis (CE-MRI) biomarkers compared to placebo.Chapter 7 was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of turmeric extracts in knee OA. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of all types of turmeric extracts to manage knee OA. Sixteen RCTs of up to 16 weeks duration, including 1810 adults with knee OA were included. Eleven RCTs compared the efficacy of turmeric extracts with placebo and five with active comparators (NSAIDs). The overall risk bias of included RCTs was moderate. Turmeric extracts significantly reduced knee pain, and improved physical function compared to placebo, but had similar effects compared to NSAIDs. No significant between-group differences were reported for either biochemical markers or imaging outcomes. Turmeric extracts had 12% fewer adverse events than NSAIDs and similar rates to placebo.In Chapter 8, we aimed to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation compared to placebo over 2 years on knee symptoms, psychological health, and inflammatory markers over 5 years in patients with knee OA. We also aimed to describe the effect of maintaining sufficient serum vitamin D levels on knee symptoms in knee OA patients over 5 years. As an extension of the Vitamin D Effects on Osteoarthritis trial (VIDEO), participants (n=173) from the Hobart centre of the trial were further followed up at 3.5 years after the cessation of 2-year investigational treatment. Vitamin D supplementation over 2 years or maintaining vitamin D sufficiency for 5 years was not associated with significant differences in change in knee symptom score over 5 years. However, two-year vitamin D supplementation was linked to WOMAC function and psychological improvement among participants who did not report knee surgery. Similarly, knee OA patients without knee surgery maintaining sufficient serum vitamin D levels over 5 years were associated with improvement in knee pain and physical function than those who did not, suggesting a potential beneficial effect of maintaining sufficient serum vitamin D for knee OA.In conclusion, CAMs were commonly used among Tasmanian older adults, with 35% of the population using CAM medications. A standardised extract of turmeric showed a moderate effect on the symptomatic management of knee OA. Vitamin D supplementation over 2 years was not associated with symptomatic improvement in knee OA patients over 5 years. However, maintaining sufficient vitamin D levels over 5 years may have a significant effect on the improvement of symptoms in knee OA patients without knee surgery.<br>

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,852
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,352

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,354
Écart entre enseignants0,331 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle