First Nations Women’s Engagement with the Family Law System in the Context of Family Violence. The Evidence Base.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This review focusses on First Nations women’s engagement with the family law system, especially in the context of family violence (FV). It consolidates key considerations gathered from existing research about, and by, First Nations people and their engagement with colonial structures and institutions, focussing on the family law system.In Australia, there has been growing recognition and understanding of the impacts of colonisation and historic and contemporary oppressive and discriminatory policies and practices on First Nations people and communities, both at an interpersonal level and in how systems and services are designed and delivered. This has underpinned efforts to reform systems and services with the aim to improve the accessibility, equity, inclusiveness and outcomes for First Nations women.First Nations women face a significantly higher risk of FV than non-First Nations women and are also at greater risk of having their children removed from their care by state-based child protection agencies – potentially as a result of FV, institutional racism and other factors. The family law system may offer some protection against child removal. As such, identifying barriers and exploring how these barriers to the family law system can be dismantled for First Nations women is a vital component of Australia’s strategy to reduce FV risks and harm. Targeted consideration of the legal and non-legal drivers and barriers First Nations women experience when engaging, or considering engaging, with the family law system is crucial.This review finds that there has been limited research specifically on First Nations women’s engagement with family law in the context of FV. Further research to identify and understand the needs of First Nations women in the family law system, especially in the context of FV, is necessary. Further analysis of available data from family courts, family law cases, support services and research with service providers and victim-survivors is needed to better understand the dynamics and drivers of First Nations women’s engagement with the family law system. This is required to continue to enhance accessibility, equity, inclusiveness and outcomes for First Nations people and to prioritise the identification of systemic reform and to highlight required service changes and other reforms as part of this endeavour. Additionally, further research is needed to provide a clear evidentiary basis to understand what is working well and to inform recommendations to reform the ways in which the family law system can best work to meet the needs of First Nations women who have experienced FV.This review developed out of a partner project between Women’s Legal Services Australia (WLSA) and the Centre of Excellence for the Elimination of Violence Against Women. WLSA is a peak body for two First Nations Women's Legal Services, Wirringa Baiya Aboriginal Women's Legal Centre and First Nations Women's Legal Service Queensland, and other Women's Legal Services that provide legal assistance and support services to First Nations women. The focus of our review is grounded in what our partner, WLSA, has identified as a key priority area in terms of practically-oriented research that is needed on the ground.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,034 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».