MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte

End of Life Care : Role of Physical Therapy intervention Within Hospice Palliative Care

2017· other· en· W6889775452 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPalliative careIntervention (counseling)Quality of life (healthcare)RehabilitationQuality (philosophy)Psychological interventionCurative careProtocol (science)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BackgroundPalliative care (PC) and best Supportive Care are complex areas to promote and advance. Many people need and benefit from them, therefore education, spreading knowledge and existence of interdisciplinary teams (IDT) are required to ensure best quality of life.Nowadays only 15% of Countries haveHospice and Palliative Care (HPC) integrated inside their national health system. Among those countries, fewoffer physical therapies.Complementary and other non-pharmacological strategies used alongsidetraditional analgesic approach aims to help patients in maintaining and improving functionality in order to obtain at the same time psychological benefits.Physical therapies (PT) are part of a no pharmacological approach, including several different techniques applied by physical therapists (PTs) with the purpose not only to manage the symptoms but also to improve Quality Of Life (QOL) of patients receivingpain rehabilitation and palliative care. It allows PTs to be part of an IDT and being active part of the holistic care of the patient.AimsLinking PC with physical rehabilitation or physical exercise (PE), the aim was to critically evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness, benefits and weaknesses of PT (exercise) in end-of-life care.Due to the results obtained and the strength of the evidence, the author suggests a first protocol involving an IDT to best fit the evidence.MethodsA systematic review has been conducted, screening and reviewing the most recent studies published and related to this topic. More than 10 among databases and journals has been investigated to answer the aim.ResultsEight studies fitted for the analysis discussing the role of physical therapy intervention in palliative care setting. The quality of the studies was done following QASP/CASP checklists.Improvements (p u2264 0.01) were observed in physical performance, fatigue, and overall quality-of-life scores. A first physical exercise programme is suggested.ConclusionsAn holistic biopsychosocial intervention (Total Pain concept) is the key for those people withcomplex and life-threatening illnesses. Not only for patients but also for the caregivers underlying the importance of a IDT. PTs play an important role inside a team focusing their intervention in improving functionality and QOL turning tophysical and functional dimensions of care.Around 75% of the population will need PC therefore it is indispensable to start offering i) the best services, ii) where patients want, iii) taking the best decisions (right care, right place, right time).PT/PE plan has to be tailor-made and based on the general prospective evolution of the patient, in his capability to recover his functionality and his desire to take part to the rehabilitation programme.References:Chong Guan, N., Kiah Tian, L., Seng Beng, T., Ahmad Hatim, S. and Nor Zuraida, Z. (2016). The Effect of 5 Minutes of Mindful Breathing to the Perception of Distress and Physiological Responses in Palliative Care Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study. Journal of Palliative Medicine 19:917.IASP. (2009). Global Year Against Cancer Pain. IASP: International Association for the Study of Pain.Jensen, W., Bialy, L., Ketels, G., Freerk T. Baumann, F. T. and Bokemeyer, C. (2014). Physical exercise and therapy in terminally ill cancer patients: a retrospective feasibility analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer 22:1261-1268.Litterini, A. J., Fieler, V. K., Cavanaugh, J. T. and Lee, J. Q. (2013). Differential effects of cardiovascular and resistance exercise on functional mobility in individuals with advanced cancer: a randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94:2329-2335.Malcolm, L., Mein, G., Jones, A., Talbot-Rice, H., Maddocks, M. and Bristowe, K. (2016). Strength in numbers: patient experiences of group exercise within hospice palliative care. BMC Palliative Care 15:97.McGrillen, K. and McCorry, N. (2014). A physical exercise programme for palliative care patients in a clinical setting: Observations and preliminary findings. Progress in Palliative Care 22:352-358.Putt, K., Faville, K. A., Lewis, D., McAllister, K., Pietro, M. and Radwan, A. (2017). Role of Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Life-Threatening Illnesses. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 34:186-196.Saunders, C. (1993). The Management of Terminal Malignant Disease. Edward Arnold, p. 305.Talbot Rice, H., Malcolm, L., Norman, K., Jones, A., Lee, K., Preston, G., McKenzie, D. et al. (2014). An evaluation of the St Christopher's Hospice rehabilitation gym circuits classes: Patient uptake, outcomes, and feedback. Progress in Palliative Care 22:319-326.Turner, F., Seiger, C. and Devine, N. (2013). Impact of patient and caregiver transfer training provided by a physical therapist in the hospice setting: a case study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 30:204-209.Wilson, C. M., Stiller, C. H., Doherty, D. J. and Thompson, K. A. (2017). The Role of Physical Therapists Within Hospice and Palliative Care in the United States and Canada. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 34:34-41.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Bibliométrie, Communication savante, Science ouverte, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,365
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0160,010
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,003
Communication savante0,0020,010
Science ouverte0,0120,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,065
Tête enseignante GPT0,370
Écart entre enseignants0,305 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)Travaux en français237 207