MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Image_4_Greenway interventions effectively enhance physical activity levels—A systematic review with meta-analysis.JPEG

2023· other· en· 0 citations· W6890017369 sur OpenAlex· 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268502.s004

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Porte sur le CanadaSon objet est le Canada, où que soient ses auteurs.

Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.

strate : about_only · poids de sondage : 3321.24 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre : other
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Supplementary figure from a systematic review and meta-analysis of greenway interventions; the parent synthesis answers a public health question.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

It uses systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the health effects of greenways.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Systematic review/meta-analysis answering whether greenways raise physical activity is domain synthesis.

Résumé

Background<p>Previous studies have examined the impact of greenway interventions on physical activity (PA); however, the results have been inconclusive. In order to address this issue, our study conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to thoroughly evaluate the evidence and determine the effectiveness of greenway interventions in promoting PA.</p>Methods<p>We conducted a comprehensive search of literature databases, such as Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed (via Medline), Cochrane Library, and Scopus, up to June 15, 2023. To synthesize the available evidence, we performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the criteria developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p>Results<p>A total of 9 publications were identified, involving 6, 589 individuals. The overall quality of most included studies was rated as moderate to high. Our study found that the greenway was effective in promoting PA among participants. Specifically, active travel (AT) showed a standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.10 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04 to 0.17], moderate-to-vigorous PA had an SMD of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.20), and total PA had an SMD of 0.14 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.21). We also observed significant differences in AT levels among participants based on greenway characteristics, exposure distance, exposure duration, and male-to-female ratio.</p>Discussion<p>Newly developed or upgraded greenways have been shown to effectively promote PA. Additionally, research suggests that the longer a greenway has been in existence, the greater the benefits it provides for PA. As a result, the construction of greenways should be recognized as an effective public health intervention.</p>

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
Figshare
Thématique
Domaine
Établissements canadiens
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
Psychological interventionConfidence intervalMeta-analysisSystematic reviewPhysical activityQuality (philosophy)Agency (philosophy)
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui