Acalypha lamiana I. Montero & Cardiel
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
24. Acalypha lamiana (Leandri) I.Montero & Cardiel PhytoKeys 108: 101 (Montero Muñoz et al. 2018a). — Acalypha reticulata var. urophylla f. lamiana Leandri, Notulae Systematicae. Herbier du Muséum de Paris. Phanérogramie. Paris 10: 263 (Leandri 1942). — Type: Madagascar. Prov. Mahajanga, Réserve de Marohogo, 28.XII.1938, H. J. Lam & A. D. J. Meeuse 6127 (lecto-, designated by Montero Muñoz et al. [2018a: 102]: P [P05604417]; isolecto-, L [L0242109]). — Former syntypes: Madagascar. Prov. Antananarivo, Tsarasaotra, II.1898, H. Perrier de la Bâthie 457 (P [P05604408, P05604409, P05604410, P05604413]); Prov. Fianarantsoa, Ankirihitra près du mont Tsiltondroina, III.1902, H. Perrier de la Bâthie 9817 (P [P05604403]), 9817 bis (P [P05604404, P05604405]); Prov. Mahajanga, NW of Ankazobe, Vallée de l’Ikopa, 14.III.1930, R. Decary 7535 (P [P05604421]); Massif de l’Ankarafantsika, 11.I.1938, R. Decary 12876 (P [P05604420]); Bekodoka, 17.IX.1930, R. Decary 8109 (P [P05604422]); Région d’Antsalova, 1932-1933, J. Leandri 998 (P [P05604411]); Tsingy du Bemaraha, 3-6.X.1932, J. Leandri 176 (P [P05604415]); Dokolahy, II-IV.1933, J. Leandri 602 (P [P05604414]); Prov. Toliara, Soahazo Forest, 100 m, 22.X.1932, J. Leandri 414 (P [P05604416]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Leandri (1942: 263); Figs 41; 46D. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet honors Dutch botanist Herman Johannes Lam (1892-1977). DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Boeny, Melaky, Bongolava, Menabe, Atsimo-Andrefana, and Anosy). Dry deciduous forest, secondary grasslands, and pastures (savanna). Frequently on Mesozoic limestone. Altitudinal range (25-) 100-800 (-1200) m (Fig. 42). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — The EOO of Acalypha lamiana is estimated to be 376 831 km 2 and its AOO 120 km 2, which is less than the 500 km 2 threshold of the B2 subcriterion of the Endangered category. This species grows mainly in the western dry deciduous forests (see comments in A. diminuta). It has been collected in some protected areas, but it is also known from several unprotected forests subject to various threats (uncontrolled fires for grazing and crops, logging, mining, etc.). Ongoing habitat loss will cause continued decline of its EOO and AOO. Acalypha lamiana is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) under criterion B. It meets the AOO values needed for a threatened category, but the number of locations is too high to meet the conditions required for a listing under the Endangered category. MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 50 collections. Madagascar. Afzelius, K. 81 (P[P00508497]); Baron, R. 6808 (K); Boivin, L.H. s.n. (K[K000186503]); Bolliger, R.F. RFB 083 (G[G00340310]); Capuron, R. 1935 (P[P04804747]), 1953 (P[P04779856, P04779858, P04779859]); Decary, R. 8109 (P[P05604422]), 8161 (K, P[P00324533]), 12876 (P[P05604420]), 15198 (P[P00508466]), 15725 (G, MA, P[P05547224]), 17069 (P[P05510110, P00324526]); Gillespie, L. 4141 (K, MO, P[P00513154], US[US01287449]), 10691 (MO), 10701 (CAN), 10702 (CAN), 10703 (CAN), 10832 (CAN); Harmelin 10247 (P[P04804764]); Humbert, H. 5102 (P[P04779863]), 12638 (P[P00508441, P00508442]), 12644 (P[P04804526, P04804527]), 19738 (P[P00508432]), 19990 (P[P00508431]), 20005 (P[P04779862]); Lam, H.J. 6127 (L[L0242109], P[P05604417]), bis 27 (P[P05604418]); Leandri, J. 176 (P[P05604415]), 414 (P[P05604416], US[US01287453]), 602 (P[P05604414]), 998 (P[P05604411]), 2060 (P[P04804746]), 2652 (P[P05543667, P00324505]), 2711 (G, K, P[P04804745]), 2856 (G, K, MO[MO-2965757], P[P04779857]), 2921 (P[P04779855]), 3018 (P[P04804744]), 4252 (P[P04804750]), s.n. (P[P05604419]); Nicoll, M.F. 377 (K, MO, P[P05604412]); Nusbaumer, L. LN 875 (K), LN 3084 (BR [BR0000015215604V], G[G00376211], MO[MO-2965725]); Perrier de la Bâthie, H. 457 (P[P05604408, P05604409, P05604410, P05604413]), 9817 (P[P05604403]), 9817 bis (P[P05604404, P05604405]); Rakotomalaza, P.J. 280 (P[P05516018]); Rakotovao, C. 4638 (P[P04804767]), 6237 (G, MO[MO-2965731], TAN); Ravelonarivo, D. 4528 (MO); Thunberg s.n. (S[S17-37572]). REFERENCES. — Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a: 101). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, probably deciduous, to 3 m tall, monoecious. Branches laxly pubescent with curved, antrorse trichomes, glabrous when mature. Axillary buds ovoid, to 1 × 0.5 mm, perulate, perules 2, valvate, membranous, blackish, glabrous. Stipules to 6 mm long, triangular, subglabrous, with some hyaline trichomes to 1 mm long, margin papillate. Petioles filiform, 1-2.5(-4) cm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches. Leaf blades 5-7 × 2-2.5(-3.5) cm, ovate-lanceolate to elliptic-lanceolate, membranous; base rounded to obtuse, rarely subcuneate; apex acuminate, acumen to 10 mm long, acute; margin serrulate, reddish, teeth minute, sometimes with simple trichome at apex; upper surface subglabrous, with some simple, appressed trichomes at base of midrib; lower surface subglabrous, with some sparse, simple trichomes; margins sparsely ciliate; venation actinodromous, basal veins 3, secondary veins 4-5 per side. Stipels glandular, to 0.5 mm diameter, glabrous. Inflorescences spiciform, androgynous, and solitary female bracts, axillary. Androgynous inflorescences to 4 cm long, mostly male with short female segment; sessile, rachis filiform, subglabrous, with some curved trichomes at base. Female segment: bracts 1-(4), sessile, enlarging in fruit to 7 × 6 mm, subrounded, glabrous; margin slightly crenate-dentate, revolute, reddish, teeth rounded, central tooth sometimes prominent; sterile bracts sometimes present, similar to regular female bracts, to 11 × 9 mm; bracteoles absent. Male segment persistent, to 3 cm long; flowers glomerate; bracts to 0.3 mm long, triangular, sparsely hairy. Solitary female bracts sessile, similar to those on androgynous inflorescences. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.5 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds to 0.7 mm diameter, glabrous. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3, to 0.5 mm long, triangular, glabrous; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, papillose-hispid, papillae on middle of each carpel, ending in simple trichome to 0.6 mm long, surface glabrous; styles 3, to 3 mm long, distinct, sparsely hairy, each divided into c. 10 segments. Allomorphic flowers sometimes present, axillary; pedicel filiform, to 19 mm long, glabrous; sepals to 0.5 mm long, triangular, glabrous; ovary 1-lobed, to 1.5 mm diameter, densely pubescent, distally fimbriate; style 1, to 4 mm long, glabrous. Capsules to 3 mm diameter, papillose-hispid, papillae similar to that on ovary, surface glabrous. Seeds c. 1.5 × 1.2 mm, pyriform, foveolate. NOTES 1) Acalypha lamiana was treated by Leandri (1942) as a form of A. reticulata var. urophylla (treated here as A. urophylla). After studying the type collections, it seems clear to us that A. lamiana must be considered a distinct species (Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a). Acalypha lamiana differs from A. urophylla mainly by the leaves that are rounded at the base and reddish at the margins, and its subentire, eglandular female bracts vs leaves that are usually rounded to subcordate, sometimes acute, at the base and not reddish at the margins, and dentate female bracts with small sessile glands at the margins in A. urophylla; 2) one of the former syntypes, H. Perrier de la Bâthie 9817, was wrongly transcribed by Leandri (1942: 263) as “ 8917 ”; and 3) many specimens bear malformed leaves, apparently due to insect damage or galls.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,024 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».