Data Tables for Enrichment by Extragalactic First Stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Machine-readable data tables for the article, "Enrichment by Extragalactic First Stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud"-- DOI: 10.1038/s41550-024-02223-w. Full descriptions of the tables are in the article, but we briefly summarize here- Table 1 (Table1.csv): This table provides general information on the stars for which we obtained long-exposure Magellan/MIKE data to derive their detailed elemental abundances. Columns include names, coordinates, SkyMapper g magnitudes from the Gaia XP spectra, and stellar parameters and metallicities with their respective random uncertainties. Table 2 (Table2.csv): This table provides names, radial velocities, metallicities, and selected elemental abundances with random uncertainties for stars listed in Table 1. [C/Fe]_c indicates carbon abundances that are corrected for the evolutionary state of the star following Placco et al. (2014). Abundances that are upper limits are flagged by the ul_[X/Fe] columns and have "nan" values for the uncertainty. Extended Data Table 1 (Extended_Data_Table1.csv): This table summarizes all of our observations, by providing names, coordinates, SkyMapper g magnitudes from the Gaia XP spectra, exposure times, dates of observation, and the instrument for these observations. This table includes stars observed with MagE, those observed with short-exposures with MIKE for just metallicities and carbon abundances, and those flagged as more metal-rich upon initial exposure and hence, not further observed. Extended Data Table 2 (Extended_Data_Table2.csv): This table provides names, followed by stellar parameters, metallicities, and carbon abundances, along with their respective uncertainties, for stars observed with MagE or MIKE for short exposures to just obtain a metallicity and carbon abundance. As in Table 2, abundances that are upper limits are flagged by the ul_[C/Fe] column and "nan" entries for the uncertainty. Supplementary Data 1 (Summary_Data_1.csv or Summary_Data_1.ascii): This table provides the suite of detailed element abundances and uncertainties from the long-exposure MIKE spectra of the stars in Table 1. Columns include the name, atomic number and ionization state of the element (element), the number of features used to estimate the elemental abundance (N), the solar abundance of that element (Solar), the absolute abundance (logeps), the chemical abundance scaled by the solar abundance relative to hydrogen ([X/H]), the ratio with respect to the iron abundance ([X/Fe]), the random uncertainty ([X/H]_err) and an upper limit flag (ul), and errors from propagating the uncertainties in the individual stellar parameters and the overall systematic and total uncertainty ([X/H]_errteff, [X/H]_errlogg, [X/H]_errvt, [X/H]_errsys, [X/H]_errtot). These are followed by the same columns, but with respect to iron (e.g., [X/Fe]_errteff, [X/Fe]_errlogg). Abundances of the CH molecule are indicated by 106.0 in the "element" column. This table is provided as a machine readable csv file and as an ascii file, the latter for easier visual readability. Supplementary Data 2 (Summary_Data_2.csv or Summary_Data_2.ascii): This table summarizes the chemical abundances from individual absorption features for the LMC stars with long-exposure MIKE spectra. The columns include the star name, the atomic number and ionization state of the element (species), the solar abundance of that element (Solar), followed by the wavelength, excitation potential, and loggf of the line (wavelength, expot, loggf), and then the measured equivalent width (EW), absolute abundance (logeps), and a flag indicating whether the abundance is an upper limit (ul). Abundances derived via spectral synthesis have "nan" entries for expot, loggf, and EW, and abundances of the CH molecular band are indicated by 106.0. This table is provided as a machine readable csv file and as an ascii file, the latter for easier visual readability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,014 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,520 | 0,203 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».