Philobrya multistriata Lamy 1908
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Philobrya multistriata Lamy, 1908 (Figure 13) Philobrya multistriata Lamy, 1908: 128, 129, figs. 1, 2; Dell 1964: 166, text figs. 2.1, 2.10, pl. 4, fig. 6. Type locality: Îles Malouines ou Falkland [= Malvinas/Falkland Islands, 50°44’S 65°04’W]. Material examined: Photographs of one syntype (MNHN-IM-2000-34158). Atlantic coast of Patagonia: Tierra del Fuego Province: 54°08.76’S 64°57.60’W, 110 m (MLP-Ma 7459: 7 spec). Isla de los Estados: Puerto Vancouver, 54°52.44’S 64°03.37’W, 271 m (MACN-In 44466: 3 v). Burdwood Bank: 54°28.49’S 60°56.46’W, 102 m (MACN-In 44467: 1 v); 54°23.82’S 58°30.53’W, 135 m (MACN-In 44468: 1 spec, 22 v); 54°29.64’S 56°08.13’W, 290 m (MLP-Ma 7460: 5 spec). Distribution: Atlantic coast of Patagonia at Tierra del Fuego Province (Dell 1964; this study), Isla de los Estados (this study), Burdwood Bank (Dell 1964; this study) and Malvinas / Falkland Islands (Lamy 1908); 110‒ 463 m. Description: Shell medium-sized (maximum L = 7.4 mm), ovate, high (H/L = 0.96 ± 0.02, n = 11), compressed (W/H = 0.57 ± 0.06, n = 11), moderately solid; with a wide, somewhat depressed dorsal slope. Umbo broad, located at anterior end, poorly discernible in smaller specimens, somewhat projected in larger specimens. Umbonal angle: 90‒100° (n = 10). Dorsal margin with the anterior portion relatively long, nearly vertical, straight, and the posterior portion curved to flattened, forming a continuous curve with the posterior margin. Ventral margin oblique, straight to slightly arched. Prodissoconch D-shaped, with posterior end higher than anterior end, widely projected ventrally, of 850‒950 µm Lp (n = 10), separated from the dissoconch by a prominent rim. Antero-dorsal and postero-dorsal areas raised, sculptured with low commarginal folds. Central area sculptured with 9 ‒13 thick radial ribs. Some ribs extending all along; others (shorter), appears distally intercalated to the previous ones. Dissoconch whitish, dull. Sculpture cancellate, consisting of 10‒15 narrow, widely separated radial ribs, and numerous, moderately separated, regularly distributed, thin, commarginal cords. Commarginal sculpture weaker than radial sculpture. Periostracum thick, pale yellow, extending up to 1 mm beyond calcified shell margin; forming narrow radial folds, raised commarginal lamellae, and short, thin setae. Commarginal lamellae extending up to the tip of the setae, with straight margin between contiguous setae. Inner shell surface with 37‒48 folds radiating from the umbo to shell margins, those reaching the posterior part of dorsal margin stronger than the others. Posterior adductor muscle scar located in the antero-posterior half of the valves, dorsally displaced. Hinge: Anterior and posterior series of G1b teeth forming an angle of 161‒169° (n = 5). Distal teeth of the posterior series partially disintegrated, forming pustules, in specimens longer than 2.9 mm. Distal teeth of the anterior series also forming pustules in specimens longer than 3.2 mm. Resilifer short and wide. Remarks: The ovate shell outline and extremely large prodissoconch are distinctive characters of P. multistriata. In general shell shape, P. multistriata resembles P. limoides (Fig. 11), from which it differs by having larger prodissoconch (850‒950 µm vs. 670‒750 µm), sculptured with fewer radial elements (9‒13 vs. 42‒47). In addition, in P. multistriata the inner shell surface is sculptured with radial folds, while these elements are absent in P. limoides (Appendix 1). Furthermore, both species are allopatric in distribution: P. multistriata occurs in the Patagonian (sub-Antarctic) waters and P. limoides in the Antarctic waters (south of the Polar Front). Small-sized specimens of P. multistriata also resemble P. magellanica. However, the prodissoconch sculpture (consisting of radial ribs in P. multistriata vs. pits in P. magellanica), the sculpture of the dissoconch (cancellate in P. multistriata vs. only showing radial elements in P. magellanica), and the presence (in P. multistriata) vs. absence (in P. magellanica) of internal folds and marginal crenulations, clearly allow the distinction of these two species. Another similar species of P. multistriata is P.sublaevis (Fig. 17; see comparison under that species and Appendix 1). The personal finding of P. multistriata in Burdwood Bank and the currently known distribution of P. sublaevis (restricted to Antarctic waters) suggest that the Burdwood Bank specimens identified by Melvill & Standen (1912) as Philobrya sublaevis could actually correspond to P. multistriata. Philobrya multistriata is sympatric with P. alata, with which it shares the presence of a radially sculptured prodissoconch, cancellate dissoconch sculpture, and short resilifer. However, the evenly ovate shell outline of P. multistriata, with straight to concave ventral margin clearly allows the distinction of this species from P. alata, where the ventral margin forms a wide, convex curve with the posterior margin. Furthermore, P. multistriata shows stronger G1b teeth than P. alata.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».