MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6892864096 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13209016

Orthonevra chilensis Thompson 1999

2024· article· en· W6892864096 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Établissements canadiensAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPedicelDorsumGaleaWhite (mutation)Appendage

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Orthonevra chilensis Thompson, 1999 Orthonevra chilensis Thompson 1999: 346, figs (wing, male genitalia). Type-locality: Chile, Vina del Mar (HT M UCS). Thompson 2006: 121 (catalog citation), 21 (key reference); Barahona-Segovia et al. 2021: 20 (catalog citation, conservation status). Figs 7 and 8. Map: Fig. 39 Redescription. MALE. Head (Fig. 7d–f): metallic blue, face wide, with convexity in profile and ventral ¼ slightly produced anteriorly as a strong convexity, regulose except for smooth ventral ¼, shiny with sparse white pile but bare medially; with white microtrichose subtriangular macula laterally, positioned immediately ventral to antennal base, and separated from antennal base; mala mostly smooth. Antenna dark, except pedicel pale laterally and postpedicel pale baso-ventrally; pedicel short but slightly longer than scape, postpedicel with mostly straight dorsal surface and convex ventral surface, with a shallow concavity pre-apically on dorsal surface, 2.5 × longer than the pedicel. Mala produced apico-ventrally, with weak regulae. Gena shiny, smooth, and with white pile. Frontal triangle shiny, rugose, uniformly covered with erect and sub-appressed white pile, without median longitudinal groove; lunule almost indistinguishable from frontal triangle. Vertical triangle isosceles triangle-shaped, 10 × the length of the eye contiguity, dark blue metallic, uniformly covered with long, erect, black pile on ocellar triangle and posterior to it. Occiput not visible laterally on dorsal 1/3, homogeneously covered in white microtrichia, and with one to two (ventrally) rows of white pile. Eyes very narrowly holoptic; with a slightly sinuous sub-anterior vitta that connects dorsally and ventrally to anterior dark margin, a medial straight vitta and a medial fascia disappearing close to posterior end. Thorax (Fig. 7d, e): metallic blue, homogeneously covered with densely distributed, short, black pile, longer and white on notopleuron; scutum with four complete separate dark matte vittae, with inconspicuous vittate smooth macula laterally on scutum posterior to transverse sulcus and on notopleural sulcus; scutellum metallic blue and somewhat darker medially, slightly depressed on apical margin, covered with very short black pile, protuberances very weak. Pleuron metallic blue, mostly smooth with few areas with fine microsculpturing, with short white pile on antepronotum, proepisternum, proepimeron, posterior anepisternum, anteriorly on anepimeron, very few on a dorsal and ventral patch on katepisternum, and on katatergum, metasternum bare. Calypter white with long white marginal pile, ventral lobe margin darker. Plumule white. Halter yellowish. Legs (Fig. 7e): metallic dark, except tibiae and first tarsomere paler and with weaker metallic reflections. Legs covered with white pile, longer ventrally on femora, apex of mesotibia and mesotarsomeres with ventral black setulae, metafemur lacking black setulae. Wing (Fig. 7e): hyaline, without any maculation; stem and C vein pale basally; vein R2+3 reaches C apically to the level of the intersection of M1 with R4+5, vein M1 slightly recurrent; wholly microtrichose; basicosta with dense appressed pale to dark pile, with two more prominent black setae apically. Alula large, 2 × the width of the cell c. Abdomen (Fig. 7d, e): metallic blue, but with large matte black area medially from terga 1 to 4; pile sockets as small protuberances, pile black, appressed and short, longer and white laterally on tergum 1 and baso-laterally on tergum 2; sterna dark metallic, with longer white appressed pile, erect on sternum 2; sternum 4 with apical margin straight. Genitalia (Fig. 8d–g): surstylus gently curving toward middle, mostly narrow but base extends ventrally, base slightly extended dorsally, with a rounded apex, mostly with long pile but bare on baso-lateral 1/3 (Fig. 8d); subepandrial sclerite arms wide; cercus oval and not extended as in other Orthonevra. Hypandrium basal 2/3 oval, apical 1/3 straight and narrow, apex sheathing the phallus dorsally, with anterior ventral notch flanked by laminae that leave it as a short ventral slit; postgonites as heavier sclerotized pedunculate structures rising dorsal to the ventral notch laminae, ending in an oval apex with an acute projection (Fig. 8e, f); phallus mostly straight, but apex slightly expanding and then tapering into an acute point, with a ventral extension anterior to basal tubular process, basal tubular process short and medially positioned. Variation. Eye medial straight vitta not always visible. FEMALE (Fig. 7a–c, 8a–c). Like male except: face convexity weaker, almost straight; mala more produced; frons regulose, except smooth around lunule, and with median longitudinal groove ending in the middle of the frons; lunule smooth; pile posterior to ocellar triangle white; eye with sub-posterior dark vitta as well; metabasitarsomere dark. Genitalia (Fig. 8a–c): tergum 7 rectangular, with a few pile on anterior margin. Sternum 7 rectangular and narrow, with a few pile on anterior margin. Tergum 8 large and quadrangular, sparsely pilose apico-laterally. Sternum 8 large, apical margin deeply concave wholly pilose except bare baso-laterally. Sternum 9 has a pair of heavier sclerotized triangular plates, with their apical vertex hooked and ending close to the apex of sternum 8, plates connected by a weaker sclerotized area medially. Epiproct rectangular with a small apical ‘V-shaped’ antero-medial notch and without basal apodemes, with a few pile latero-medially. Cercus semi-oval, with a truncate basal margin, pilose on apical 1/3, positioned apically to epiproct. Hypoproct mostly membranous, with medial pigmented area, with a few pile only on apex of pigmented area. Length. Body 4.74–5.16mm (n=3), wing 3.75–4.01mm (n=3); female 4.69–5.88mm (n=3), wing 4.01–4.79mm (n=3). Distribution. Chile (Fig. 39). Altitudinal range. 50–500m. Comments. With O. quadristriata, it is one of the only species studied virtually without any maculation on the wing and a slightly recurrent M1 vein. Orthonevra chilensis is the only Orthonevra species studied that lacks black setulae on the metafemur, also unique are the bare metasternum, the unique condition of the postgonite of the male genitalia (O. quadristriata also has a pedunculate postgonite (Fig. 31h–j) but not so modified as in O. chilensis) and rectangular female epiproct with a small medial notch. This is the first time the female is described. This species is endemic to Chile and only occurs in low altitudes west of the Andes. Type material: CHILE. Valparaíso, Viña del Mar [ca 32°59’34.0”S 71°32’13.4”W], 4.iv.1917, P. Herbst (male holotype chilensis UCS, USNMENT01492691). Additional material examined: CHILE. Coquimbo, Tilama [ca 32°5’11.59”S 71°10’2.13”W], El Naranjo [?], ??. x.1967, L.E. Peña (4 male and 5 female paratypes MZUSP, USNMENT01492601–608, …696).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,094

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0280,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy→Travaux en français237 207→