Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Lyroda subita Say Lyroda subita Say, 1837:372, ♀. Holotype or syntypes: USA: Indiana: no specific locality (lost). Neotype: ♀, Michigan: Cheboygan County, no specific locality (USNM), present designation. – Le Conte, 1859:755 (original description copied); Patton, 1880:387 (in checklist of North American Larrinae); Provancher, 1882:49 and 1883:632 (original description translated into French); Kohl, 1885:267 (in checklist of world Lyroda); Cresson, 1887:277 (in catalog of North American Hymenoptera); W. Fox, 1892 c:138 (does not belong to Didineis); Patton, 1892:90 (may belong to Didineis, prey carrying), 1893:202 (Nemobius prey is killed and not paralyzed); W. Fox, 1894:533 (in revision of North American Larrinae); Dalla Torre, 1897:696 (in catalog of world Hymenoptera); G. Peckham and E. Peckham, 1898:169 (nesting habits); Ashmead, 1899:250 (in checklist of North American Crabronidae); J. Smith, 1900:518 (in list of insects of New Jersey); Harrington, 1902:222 (Canada: Ontario: Ottawa); Adlerz, 1904:137 (known prey: gryllids); G. Peckham and E. Peckham, 1905:253 (nesting habits); Snow, 1906:134 (Arizona); H. Smith, 1908:374 (in revision of Nebraskan Sphecidae); J. Smith, 1910:684 (in new list of insects of New Jersey); F. Williams, 1914:174 (in revision of Larrinae of Kansas), 207 (nesting habits); Rohwer, 1916:683 (in catalog of Hymenoptera of Connecticut); Gahan and Rohwer, 1918:30 (Provancher’s specimens not located); Mickel, 1918:408 (in catalog of Nebraskan Sphecidae); Rohwer in Viereck, 1925:683 (in key to Sphecidae of Connecticut; East Hartford, New Haven); J.Ch. Bradley, 1928:1010 (in catalog of New York Crabronidae); Hendrickson, 1930:159 (Iowa); Iwata, 1933:7 (in list of world Lyroda); Krombein, 1936:98 (New York: Buffalo; floral records); Brimley, 1938:443 (North Carolina: Fayetteville, Raleigh); Krombein, 1950:267 (North Carolina: Dare County), 1951a:143 (Virginia: Dunn Loring; visiting tulip-tree honeydew); Krombein in Muesebeck, Krombein, and Townes 1951:941 (in catalog of North American Hymenoptera); Krombein, 1952:93 (USA: Virginia: Westmoreland State Park); K. Cooper, 1953:33 (Massachusetts: Island of Penikese); Krombein, 1953:328 (North Carolina); Gittins, 1960:135 (Idaho); Kurczewski and Kurczewski, 1963:146 (Pennsylvania: Presque Isle State Park); Evans, 1964:281 (description of larva), 282 (nesting habits); Krombein, 1963:273 (Maryland: Plummers Island near Washington, D.C.); G. Bohart, Nye, and Hawthorn, 1970:48 (Utah: Logan, onion pollinator); Kurczewski and Kurczewski, 1971:132 (prey: Nemobius carolinus Scudder, a gryllid); Evans, 1975:265 (unsuccessful colonizer of a new habitat); R. Bohart and Menke, 1976:299 (in checklist of world Sphecidae); L. Davis, 1978:217 (North Carolina: Kill Devil Hills, data from Krombein, 1953); Krombein, 1979:1633 (in catalog of North American Hymenoptera); Finnamore, 1982:109 (in Sphecid Fauna of southern Quebec); Kurczewski and Peckham, 1982:149–155 (nesting habits); Kurczewski and Spofford, 1985:113 (unusual prey: Tridactylidae); Radović, 1985:65 (sting apparatus analyzed); Piek and Spanjer, 1986:185 (in list of Sphecidae with known prey); Steiner, 1986:104 (references to publications on nesting habits); Spofford, Kurczewski, and Downes, 1989:256, 259 (reference to publications on nest parasites Metopia argyrocephala (Meigen) and Senotainia trilineata (Wulp), miltogrammine flies), 257, 260 (nest parasites: Metopia luggeri Townsend, Phrosinella aurifacies Downes, Senotainia rubriventris Macquart, Senotainia vigilans Allen, miltogrammine flies, and undetermined miltogrammine species); Kurczewski and Acciavatti, 1990:60 (New York: Cayuga County); Spofford and Kurczewski, 1990:746, 747, 748, 749, 751 (nest parasites: Metopia luggeri (Townsend), Phrosinella aurifacies, Senotainia rubriventris Macquart, Senotainia trilineata (Van der Wulp), Senotainia vigilans Allen, and unknown species of Miltogrammini, Sarcophagidae); Kurczewski, 1991:203 (burrow construction from ground surface); Spofford and Kurczewski, 1992:997 (species of miltogrammine parasites listed), 1002 (counter-cleptoparasitic habits: freeze-stop and face-off, diversionary flight), 1005 (post-larvipositional counter-cleptoparasitic habits: abandon prey); Ahlstrom, 1995:109 (in checklist of insects of North Carolina); Kurczewski, 1998:250 (pine barrens in upstate New York); Sugar et al., 1998:15 (Canada: southern Ontario); Buck, 2004:25 (Canada: in checklist of Crabronidae of Ontario); Giles and Ascher, 2006:231 (New York: Black Rock Forest Preserve). – As Tachytes subitus: F. Smith, 1856:307 (new combination, in catalog of Hymenoptera in British Museum). – As Lyrops subita: Cresson, 1862:238 (new combination, in catalog of North American Hymenoptera). – As Larrada subita: Cresson, 1873:213 (new combination, Texas). Lyroda sp.: Alayo Dalmau, 1973:176 and 1976:21, corrected to Lyroda antillana by Genaro and Portuondo, 2001:45. Lyroda antillana Genaro and Portuondo, 2001:45, ♀. Holotype: ♀, Cuba: Guantánamo: El Imbano, Cuchillas de Baracoa (MNHN Habana). Paratypes: Dominican Republic (FSCA), one paratype examined. New synonym. – Portuondo and Fernández, 2004:135 (Cuba: Sierra Maestra and Nipe-Sagua-Baracoa mountains); Amarante, 2005 a:5 (in addendum to his 2002 catalog of Neotropical Crabronidae and Sphecidae); Genaro, 2006:54 (in checklist of Cuban Sphecidae and Crabronidae; also: Hispaniola); Perez-Gelabert, 2008:240 (in list of arthropods of island of Hispaniola). RECOGNITION. Lyroda subita resembles L. triloba in having a black gaster. Unlike that species, the propodeal side is at most inconspicuously ridged and has at least a short, rudimentary spiracular grove (Fig. 12), rather than with well-defined ridges and no spiracular grove. The female has three well defined teeth on each side of the clypeal lamella (Fig. 10), its wing membrane is mostly translucent except darkened in Floridian populations, the clypeal setae are silvery, and also silvery is the pubescence on the propodeum and the apical depressions of terga I-III (rather than the clypeal teeth inconspicuous, wing membrane dark, clypeal setae dark, and the pubescence of the propodeum and the gaster dark). In the male, the clypeal free margin has an obtuse, median projection (Fig. 11) rather than being rounded mesally. JUSTIFICATION OF NEW SYNONYMY. Genaro and Portuondo, 2001 differentiated Lyroda antillana from L. subita by a single character: a more intensely sculptured propodeal dorsum in the former species. We have examined a female paratype of L. antillana from the Dominican Republic as well as two males from that country, and were unable to detect any other difference. The presence of a spiracular groove on the propodeum is as in L. subita. We have also noticed that the sculpture of the propodeal dorsum varies significantly: it is inconspicuous in many specimens from the continental North America (Fig. 13), but almost as conspicuous in some specimens from Florida (Fig. 14) as in the Dominican paratype examined (Fig. 15). Based on these observations we conclude that Lyroda antillana in no more than a Caribbean population of L. subita, and we synonymize these two names. DESCRIPTION. Propodeal side at most with evanescent ridges, with spiracular groove that varies from short, inconspicuous to long, well defined. Clypeal setae silvery. Tergum I in vast majority of specimens with several smaller ridges in addition to pair of main basomedian carinae. Body black. Wings membrane mostly translucent except darkened in Floridian populations. ♀: Anterior margin of clypeus with three teeth on each side, truncate medially (Fig. 10). Gastral terga I-III with silvery pubescence on apical depressions. Length 10.0–13.0 mm. ♂: Free margin of clypeal lamella with obtuse prominence mesally (Fig. 11). Length 6.1–10.0 mm. GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION (Fig. 16). North America from southern Canada south to Jalisco State in Mexico, also Cuba and the Dominican Republic. RECORDS. CANADA: Alberta: Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park (4 ♀, CAS). Manitoba: Aweme (1 ♀, CNC), Brandon (1 ♂, CNC), Carberry (2 ♀, CNC), 5 mi. W Carberry (2 ♀, CNC), 13 mi. N Glenboro: Bald Head Hills (1 ♀, CNC). New Brunswick: Kouchibouguac National Park (1 ♀, CNC), St. John (1 ♂, CNC). Nova Scotia: Kings Co. (1 ♀, CNC). Ontario: Belleville (1 ♀, 2 ♂ CNC), Brighton (1 ♀, 1 ♂, CNC), Dunrobin (1 ♀, CNC), Chatham (1 ♀, CNC), Jordan (1 ♀, CNC), Kearney (1 ♀, CAS), 15 mi. SE Kenora (1 ♂, CAS), Ottawa (2 ♀, 7 ♂, CNC), Point Pelee (3 ♀, CNC), Sant David (1 ♀, CNC), Spencerville (2 ♀, CNC), Strathroy (7 ♀, 1 ♂, CNC), Toronto (1 ♂, CNC), Vineland (1 ♀, CNC). Quebec: Aylmer (1 ♂, CNC), Harrington (1 ♂, CNC), Hemmingford (1 ♂, CNC), Hull (1 ♀, CNC). Saskatchewan: Fort Qu′Appelle (1 ♀, CNC). CUBA (Genaro and Portuondo, 2001): Guantánamo: El Imbano: Cuchillas de Baracoa. Santiago de Cuba: Santa María de Loreto. Holguín: La Melba: Moa. DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: Hato Mayor: Farm Mango Limpio 25 km NNW Hato Mayor (1 ♂, CAS). Pedernales: 21 km N Cabo Rojo (1 ♀, FSCA, paratype of L. antillana). MEXICO: Chihuahua: 50 road km S Creel which is 27°46’S 107°39’W (1 ♀, CAS). Jalisco: Teocaltiche (2 ♀, CAS). USA: Arizona: Cochise Co.: 28 mi. N Douglas (1 ♀, UCD). Arkansas: Benton Co.: 2 mi. N Siloam Springs (1 ♂, USNM). California: Davis (12 ♀, 6 ♂, UCD), Fresno Co.: Firebaugh (1 ♀, USNM), Merced Co.: Dos Palos (1 ♀, AMNH), Hayward (1 ♂, FSCA), Riverside Co.: 18 mi. W Blythe, Hopkins Well (1 ♀, 6 ♂, CAS), Mendota (1 ♀, USNM), Orange Co.: Santa Ana (1 ♀, 1 ♂, USNM), Shasta Co.: 10 mi. N Redding (1 ♀, 1 ♂, FSCA), Shasta Co.: 2 mi. W Shingletown (21 ♀, 2 ♂, FSCA), Kern Co.: 3 mi. SW Taft (1 ♀, UCD), Vacaville (1 ♂, UCD), Woodland (4 ♀, 1 ♂, UCD). Colorado: Boulder (2 ♀, USNM), Crook (1 ♀, AMNH), Larimer Co.: Fort Collins (2 ♀, CAS), Springs Co.: Fountain Valley (1 ♀, AMNH), Glenwood (1 ♀, AMNH), Yuma Co.: 4 mi. NE Idalia (2 ♀, AMNH), Shafter Co.: Kern (1 ♀, FSCA), White Rock (1 ♀, AMNH), no specific locality (3 ♀, USNM). Con
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».