Empis (Enoplempis) tularensis Sinclair, Brooks & Cumming, 2025, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Empis (Enoplempis) tularensis sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: F6CCFFF2-ACB6-4DE0-8119-394B11CBC3B8 (Figs 138, 139, 148, 149, 152) Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂, labelled: “[USA] Calif: Tulare/ Co. 1 mi NE./ Posey [35°48′N 118°40′W] V-14- 63”; “ S.W. Earnshaw / collector”; “ HOLOTYPE / Empis (Enoplempis) / tularensis Sinclair,/ Brooks & Cumming [red label]” (EMEC). PARATYPES: USA. California: Tulare County: Hot Spring [35°52′N 118°40′W], 14.v.1963, C.A. Toschi (2♂, EMEC); same data except, S.W. Earnshaw (1♂, EMEC); 6 mi. N Kaweah [36°28′N 118°55′], 28.iv.1979, JAP (1♂, EMEC); same data except, 10 mi. SE Three Rivers [36°27′N 118°53′W], 2800 ft, 29.iv.1979 (1♂, EMEC); Sequoia NP, Ash Mt. [36.591°N 119.069°W], 26.vi.1961, E.I. Schlinger (1♂, UCDC); Sequoia NP, ½ mi. SE Ash Mtn., 3.v.1984, R.D. Haines (1♂, CSCA). Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from E. (En.) clava sp. nov. by the single blade-like, posteroventral preapical seta on the male hind femur, longer than width of femur and row of strong anteroventral setae on apical third of hind femur, longer than width of femur (Fig. 138), absence of brown vittae on the scutum and the closely approximated male eyes. Description. Wing length 3.7–4.3 mm. Male. Similar to E. (En.) clava sp. nov., except as follows: head with eyes closely approximated on frons. Palpus brown, with dark setulae. Thorax brown in ground-colour, pruinescent. Scutum with medial pair of dark brown vittae (viewed anteriorly) (Fig. 139); apparently without row of acr. Laterotergite with cluster of dark setae. Anterior and posterior spiracles pale brown. Legs short, fore and midlegs slender, hindleg stocky; femora yellowish brown, tibiae and tarsomeres brownish, darker apically; coxae yellowish brown with or without greyish pruinescence. Femora without white ventral pile. Fore tibia with 3–4 erect dorsal setae, usually longer than width of tibia; posterior and ventral faces with erect dense pile of setae; apex with circlet of preapical setae. Fore tarsomere 1 expanded, slightly broader than apex of tibia; ventrum with dense mat of setae, with some stronger setae; tarsomeres 2–4 with biserial row of strong ventral setae; tarsomeres 1–4 with apicolateral pair of strong setae, longer than width of segment. Mid femur with anteroventral and posteroventral row of dark, strong setae. Mid tibia with 2–3 pairs of erect anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae near base. Mid tarsus slender, with tarsomeres 1–4 with biserial row of strong ventral setae; tarsomeres 1–4 with apicolateral pair of strong setae, longer than width of segment. Hind femur not greatly expanded apically, with long, pale, slender ventral setae, slightly shorter than width of femur; apical third with row of 7–8 dark, strong anteroventral setae, anterior setae shorter and thicker; preapex without lobes or anteroventral processes; preapex with anvil-shaped posteroventral process, narrowly tapered apically with attenuated base; preapical posterior face with 2 thickened setae, proximal seta blade-like, longer than width of femur, distal seta shorter, slightly more than half-length proximal seta; apex with several strong anterior and posterior setae (Fig. 138). Hind tibia with base narrowed; anteroventral swelling expanded posteriorly with crown of strong to spine-like black setae; posterior face with swelling opposite anteroventral process, with rim of spine-like setae on outer face; 5–6 erect anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae, slightly longer than width of tibia, with erect setae on all faces of tibia; posteroapical comb with seta (Fig. 138). Hind tarsus with tarsomere 1 slightly swollen; tarsomeres 1–4 similar to mid tarsus. Wing infuscate with dark veins. Halter brown, with base of stalk paler. Abdomen paler than thorax, subshiny, with thin pruinosity; setae dark. Pregenital segments unmodified, except sclerites of segment 8 weakly separated anterolaterally. Terminalia (Figs 148, 149): similar colour to abdomen; phallus brownish, paler apically. Cercus linear, tapered to narrow rounded apex, shorter than epandrium; dorsal margin straight; setae slender, dense, dorsal setae longer than width of cercus. Subepandrial process with narrow, tapered apex; extending to either side of phallus. Epandrial lamella linear, subtriangular, posterior margin broadly rounded, not expanded dorsally; narrowly fused with cercus anteriorly; evenly clothed in slender setae, shorter than width of epandrium. Hypandrium short, apical margin truncate, with numerous short setae. Phallus (Fig. 149) expanded on lower half; tapered and sinuous on apical half, sharply bent to expanded apex; without pair of short, lateral lobes proximal to bend; apical opening surrounded by 2–3 rows of spicules; apex emerging beyond cerci; ejaculatory apodeme large, more than one-half length of epandrium, T-shaped, with lateral apodemes near lower margin. Female. Unknown. Geographical distribution and seasonal occurrence (Fig. 152). This species is known only from April to June in Tulare County, California. Etymology. The species name is in reference to the type locality, Tulare County, California. Nuptial gift presentation. Form unknown.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».