Phanaeus (Phanaeus) yecoraensis Edmonds 2004, new species
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Phanaeus (Phanaeus) yecoraensis Edmonds, new species Figs. 3–5, 8–9, 10–14 Type Series. Holotype, male — Mexico: Sonora, Highway 16, 1.8 road miles [3 km] NW Yécora [28°21'34"N 108°57'06"W], 5,338' [1,640 m] elevation, 6-VIII-2003, R. A. Cunningham and B. D. Streit. Paratypes (15 males, 14 females)— two males, two females same data as holotype; one male, four females same data as holotype except 4- VIII-2003; one male, four females same data as holotype except 5-VIII-2003; three males, three females same data as holotype except 7-VIII-2003; two males same data as holotype except 18-VII-2003, Barney D. Streit collector; one female same data as holotype except 5.0 road miles [8 km] NW Yécora [28°20'54"N 108°59'29"W], 5,874' [1,800 m] elevation, 7-VIII-2003; one male same data as holotype except 1.0 [1.5 km] road mile E Yécora [28°22'20"N 108°54'38"W], 5,147' elevation, 18-VII-2003, Barney D. Streit collector; one male same data as holotype except 5.0 road miles [8 km] E Yécora [28°23'23"N 108°52'25"W], 5,647' [1,740 m] elevation, 7-VIII-2003; two males, Sonora, 10 mi [16 km] NW Yécora, 1.3 mi [2 km] S old hwy 16, Rancho Aguajia, 28-29/ VII 1987, 4,320' [1,330 m], dung trap, S. McCleve; one male, Sonora, Hwy 16, 20.1 [32 km] mi E Río Yaqui, 3,110 ft [950 m], 26-27/VII 1987, ex dung, S. McCleve; one male, Sonora, 3.2 mi [5 km] NW Huicoche´, 5,170 ft [1,590 m], 11–13/VII 1989, ex dung trap, S. McCleve. (Note: All type specimens bear my determination labels printed in black ink on white paper bordered in red. The holotype and all paratypes collected in 2003 carry secondary labels reading ‘‘Taken in pitfall trap baited with human dung.’’ The female paratype depicted in Fig. 5 bears an additional label reading ‘‘ Fig. 5, Edmonds 2004.’’) Deposition of Types. Holotype male and three paratypes (1 male; 2 females, including that depicted in Fig. 5) deposited in collection of the Instituto de Ecología (Xalapa, Veracruz — México). Remaining paratypes distributed as follows: National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. (1 male, 1 female); Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa (1 male, 1 female); The Natural History Museum, London (1 male, 1 female); private collections of Scott McCleve, Douglas, Arizona (3 males, 1 female); W. D. Edmonds, Marfa, Texas (4 males, 2 females); and Barney D. Streit, Tucson, Arizona, and Richard Cunningham, Chino, California (4 males, 6 females). Etymology of Species Name. Yécora (place name) þ -ensis (inhabitant of [Latin suffix]). Yécora, Sonora, is the point of reference for the type locality and known distribution of Phanaeus yecoraensis. Description. Dorsum dark, appearing almost black to unaided eye; magnification (x5) under bright light reveals dark blue, green or bluish-green metallic color on posterior portion of clypeus, paraocular areas, pronotum, elytra and pygidium; pronotum and elytra usually completely colored in male, with black areas of variable size on pronotum and elytra of female; venter dark with green reflections on sterna and legs. Clypeal process quadrate. Protibia tridentate, apical two teeth carinate on outer surface. Posterior pronotal fossae effaced or only weakly indicated. Longer mesotibial spur narrow, not strongly dilated subapically. Elytral interstriae (especially 2–5) flat, broadly shining, finely and evenly punctate (x5; Fig. 9); striae and edges of interstriae shagreened. Male (major): Head bearing large horn, apical one-half abruptly and strongly curved posteroventrally producing hook shape (Figs. 3–4, 11); pronotal disc (Figs. 3, 8) coarsely granulorugose, becoming coarsely punctate posteromedially; sides of pronotum more finely granulorugose than disc, becoming coarsely punctate posterior to lateral fossa; posterior angles of disc strongly rounded and reflexed; disc bordered on each side by narrow sulcus extending from posterior angle to point near anterior margin (Fig. 8, arrow). Male (minor): Pronotum as above except sculpturing finer and punctate areas more extensive, disc lacking lateral sulci; head horn shorter, scarcely curved posteriorly (Fig. 12) or reduced to small, conical tubercle (Fig. 13). Female: Head with strongly raised, quadrate process, apex emarginate and dentate laterally (Figs. 5, 14); pronotum evenly granulorugose, becoming punctatorugose to punctate posteriorly; in large individuals, pronotum produced as strong, quadrate lobe, anterior margin carinate; posterior punctation of disc asperate; in smaller individuals, pronotal sculpturing finer, never asperate posteriorly, punctate areas larger and median lobe attenuated, lacking carinate anterior margin. Length [including head]: 15–20 mm; width [at bases of elytra]: 9–12 mm. Holotype (Figs. 3–4, 8–9):. Large (major) male, length, 19 mm; width, 12 mm. Basal one-half of clypeus metallic green, pronotum greenish-blue, green reflections strongest laterally; elytra dark blue with faint green reflections along anterior and lateral margins; pygidium blue. Posterior pronotal fossae faintly visible. Otherwise as described above. Specimens examined. 16 males, 14 females. Discussion. Phanaeus yecoraensis was discovered by Scott McCleve, who very kindly sent me for study four large males collected in dung-baited pitfall traps from three locations west and south of Yécora (see paratype data). At the time (Edmonds 1994) I referred these specimens to Phanaeus flohri Nevinson because of insufficient material, especially females, to make a reliable judgment on their identity. Careful fieldwork by Barney Streit and Richard Cunningham has very recently yielded a series of specimens suitable for careful comparison with P. flohri. The following modification of the key to the species of the Phanaeus mexicanus group (Edmonds 1994) will distinguish these two species. 1a Elytral interstriae smooth and shiny medially, shagreened laterally, finely punctate (x25); striae dull, shagreened. Sides of pronotum densely punctatorugose around and behind lateral fossae. Pronotal disc of large males flat, posterior angles strongly rounded, entire disc (seen from above) almost heart-shaped. Longer mesotibial spur not strongly dilated subapically. Clypeal process almost quadrate. Dark, appearing almost black to unaided eye (magnification reveals dark blue or green coloration) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1b Elytral interstriae evenly shiny, smooth or only very weakly and sparsely punctate (x25). Sides of pronotum granulorugose around and at least some distance behind lateral fossae. Pronotal disc of large male variable but rarely flat. Longer mesotibial spur strongly dilated subapically, especially in female (except scutifer). Clypeal process evenly rounded. Conspicuously colored, usually very brightly so - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (couplet 2, Edmonds 1994:61) 2a Cephalic horn of large male robust, distal one-half strongly curved posteroventrally, hook-shaped (Figs. 3–4, 11). Pronotal disc of large male bordered on each side by narrow sulcus (Fig. 8, arrow). Cephalic process of female strongly raised, quadrate, widely bidentate apically (Figs. 5, 14). Elytral interstriae 2–5 broadly shining medially, flat, distinctly punctate (x10; Fig. 9). Northwest Mexico (southeastern Sonora) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Phanaeus (P.) yecoraensis Edmonds, n.sp. 2b Cephalic horn of large male slender, evenly curved posteriorly, never hook-shaped (Figs. 1–2). Pronotal disc of male lacking lateral sulci (Fig. 6). Cephalic process of female a low, trituberculate transverse ridge (Fig. 15). Elytral interstriae 2–5 weakly convex, shagreened, only narrowly shiny medially if at all, weakly punctate (x10; Fig. 7). Central Mexico - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Phanaeus (P.) flohri Nevinson Besides those characters mentioned in the key, P. yecoraensis differs from P. flohri in the following ways: In P. yecoraensis, the posteromedian pronotal fossae are effaced or only weakly indicated, while in P. flohri, they are small but almost always distinct and punctiform; the posterior pronotal angles of large males are relatively more strongly elevated in P. yecoraensis (cf. Figs. 2 and 4), and the raised posteromedian area of the pronotum of large males is less distinct and more strongly sculptured (the same area appears as a distinctly raised, less punctate area in P. flohri; cf. Figs. 6 and 8). The more strongly elevated posterior pronotal angles of the male produce the false effect of a more flattened prothorax than in P. flohri, which I erroneously observed (Edmonds, 1994). In large females, the median pronotal prominence has a nearly straight, carinate anterior margin and strong lateral angles, while in P. flohri the anterior margin is rounded, not carinate and has weaker lateral angles. Small males and females of P. yecoraensis are best separated from those of P. flohri by the flatter, more conspicuously punctate elytral interstriae (cf. Figs. 7 and 9) and stronger punctation on posterior portion of pronotum. The similarities (punctation of the sides of the pronotum; non-dilated mesotibial spurs) I noted in 1994 between P. flohri and the Phanaeus hermes species group extend to P. yecoraensis. Both species share non-dilated mesotibial spurs also with P. scutifer; and P. yecoraensis and P. scutifer both possess a widely bidentate female cephalic process. Distribution. The Yécora region lies in the western foothills of the Sierra Madre Occidental near the Sonora — Chihuahua border. Yécora itself (elevation ~ 1,500 m) is located in a small valley between the higher sierras to the east rising to> 2,000 m and supporting pine-oak forests, and to the west rising to ~ 1,700 m and supporting mainly oak-pine-ju
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».