Idris longiscapus Debnath, Rajmohana & Sushama 2025, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Idris longiscapus Debnath, Rajmohana & Sushama sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: B28FCAA7-B75F-4428-9ADD-637944507375 Fig. 4 Diagnosis In the species identification key of Rajmohana (2014), Idris longiscapus Debnath, Rajmohana & Sushama sp. nov. comes close to I. lakshmani (Mani, 1939). Since the types of I. lakshmani could not be traced, species comparison was made using the original description. Idris longiscapus can be distinguished from the latter by the colour of the head (black vs honey brown to yellow), smaller HW/ HH (1.4× vs 2.0×), and longer pm (equal to m vs half of m). In the species identification key of Lê (2000), this species runs to I. hunnus Kozlov & Lê, 1987; however, I. longiscapus can be distinguished from the latter by the colour of metasoma (pale yellow vs black), sculpture of metapleural epicoxal sulcus (smooth vs foveolate) and shorter T3 (1.6× of T2 length vs 2.2× of T2 length). Among the other Oriental species of Idris, I. longiscapus shows similarity to I. fasciatipennis in having the forewings clouded behind the st. Although the types of I. fasciatipennis are damaged and the species description is insufficient, the elongate scape provides an immediate distinguishing feature, with I. longiscapus having a scape 5.6× as long as wide compared to 3.4× as long as wide in I. fasciatipennis. Etymology The specific epithet ‘ longiscapus ’ is derived from the Latin words ‘ longus ’ (long) and ‘ scapus ’ (scape), referring to the elongated scape characteristic of this species. It is intended as an adjective in apposition. Type material Holotype INDIA • ♀; West Bengal: Bankura, Nobanda; 22.271164° N, 87.141502° E; 110 m alt.; 2 Nov. 2023; Rupam Debnath leg.; ex eggs of Harmochirus brachiatus (Thorell, 1877); ZSI/34246/H3. Paratypes INDIA • 8 ♀♀; same data as for holotype; ZSI/34247/H3 to ZSI/34254/H3 • 1 ♂; same data as for holotype; ZSI/34255/H3. Description Female BODY LENGTH. 0.88–0.94 mm (n = 9). COLOUR. Head, mesosoma, lateral patches on T2 brownish black; metasoma honey brown except T4–T7 brown; mandibles, legs, antennae yellow; wings hyaline except slightly clouded behind the st; setae on body white. HEAD. 1.2× as wide as high; 1.4× as high as long; 1.8× as wide as long; HW/TSL= 1.4; IOS 0.4× HW; head including vertex setigerous granulate except reticulate antennal scrobe; central keel incomplete, reaching up to mid-level of eye; lagrimal small, smooth; facial striae absent; malar striae absent; eyes densely pubescent; mandible tridentate, middle tooth longer than upper and lower tooth; lateral ocelli contiguous with orbital margin; POL> LOL in ratio of 2:1; POL 6.5× OD; hyper occipital carina absent; occipital carina complete; A1 5.6× as long as wide, 0.8× of clava in length; A2 2.5× of A 3 in length; A3 1.2× as long as wide; proportions of length to width of A1 to A6 (113:20), (54:27), (21:17), (13:19), (12:20), (12:24); clava 2.1× as long as wide. MESOSOMA. Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum 0.7× and 0.5× as long as wide respectively; mesoscutum finely imbricate, densely setose; mesoscutellum granulose, sparsely setose; notauli absent; mesoscutal suprahumeral sulcus and mesoscutal humeral sulcus absent; scutoscutellar sulcus foveolate laterally in axillar area and smooth medially; posterior mesoscutellar sulcus foveolate; metascutellum smooth; metanotal trough foveolate; propodeum with longitudinal striae, placed apart by 3.0× of its own width, medially with 2 tooth-like projections; pronotal suprahumeral sulcus absent; epomial carina absent; cervical pronotal area granulose; lateral pronotal area smooth; mesopleural pit present; mesopleural carina incomplete, restricted to anterior half; prespecular sulcus foveolate; mesepimeral sulcus foveolate up to mesopleural pit and then present as a strong carina towards mesocoxa; femoral depression smooth; ventral and dorsal metapleural area smooth; metapleural pit distinct, from which metapleural sulcus extends as a smooth furrow anteriorly towards posterior margin of mesopleuron and posteriorly towards posterior margin of metapleuron; metapleural sulcus foveolate anterodorsally; paracoxal sulcus present as a simple furrow. WINGS. Macropterous; forewing (L:W = 67:24), m: pm: st = 2:2:9; hindwing (L:W = 64:8). METASOMA. 1.4× as long as wide; T1 with longitudinal parallel costae throughout; T2 with longitudinal parallel costae extending to half of its length, finely reticulate laterally, smooth apically, moderately setose laterally. T3 longest and widest of all tergites, 2.2× as long as T2 with fine reticulation, smooth apically, sparsely setose laterally and sub laterally; T4 imbricate basally, smooth apically, sparsely setose; T5 smooth; T6 and T7 not visible in dorsal view; proportions of width to length of T1 to T5 (107:50), (147:81), (248:180), (213:36), (123:6); S1 longitudinally costate; S2 with a row of fovea basally followed by longitudinal parallel costae reaching up to ⅔ of its length, reticulate laterally, smooth apically; S3–S6 reticulate, moderate to densely setose. Male Body length = 0.84 mm. Morphologically similar to females with the main exception of antenna. Antenna 12-merous, length to width ratio of A1–A12 (13:3), (6:3), (4:3), (4:3), (4:3), (4:3), (4:3), (4:3), (4:3), (4:4), (3:3), (6:4). Biology Reared from the eggs of Harmochirus brachiatus (Salticidae: Araneae) (Rajmohana et al. 2025). Distribution West Bengal (India), Pakistan (based on BLAST search). Variation Some of the females have T2 smooth basally and then entirely longitudinally costate. In addition, differences in female body length are noted (see description above). Molecular characterization The mt COI sequence of I. longiscapus (GenBank: PP574570) shows a minimum of 12.2% genetic distance to an unidentified species of Idris from Canada (GenBank: MG514562). Interestingly, the BLAST search of I. longiscapus sequence retrieved 99.8% similarity to a sequence of unpublished scelionid specimen from Pakistan (GenBank: KY842170).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».