MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893389654 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16422914

Pterourus bjorkae Pavulaan 2024

2024· article· en· W6893389654 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeTaxonPopulationType localityIntrogressionAllotype

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Pterourus bjorkae Pavulaan, 2024 New England Tiger Swallowtail (new species) ZooBank registration: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 5524CE5E-2146-4F91-A9AD-2E8EC1FE5BD7 Holotype and TL: A female holotype has been designated to represent this species (Figs. 22-23). This is due to the problem of differentiating males from other species within the glaucus species complex. Females are most distinct. The type locality is Great Swamp Management Area, West Kingston, Washington County, Rhode Island, May 15, 1990. An allotype male (Figs. 24- 25) has been designated: Great Swamp Management Area, West Kingston, Washington County, Rhode Island, June 3, 1984. 12 male and 7 female paratypes are retained by the author. Many other paratypes in the collection of the late Alex Grkovich. Status: Originally viewed as a possible distinct species during my 1983-1984 Rhode Island field surveys. Uncommon resident, though very widespread in occurrence. Generally, only observed as single individuals, less frequently only in very small numbers in Massachusetts. No population irruptions were ever observed or reported. In many respects, P. bjorkae appears analogous to Appalachian P. appalachiensis, and has been referred to as P. “near- appalachiensis ” by local butterfly observers for several years as of this writing. Intermediate characters between glaucus and canadensis lends to a hybrid origin for appalachiensis through introgression of characters during the last glacial maxima (Kunte, et al, 2011; Ording, 2008; Ording et al., 2009; Scriber & Ording, 2005). This very likely has occurred as well with bjorkae. It is possible that there is still hybridization occurring between this species and siblings glaucus and canadensis. However, this taxon does appear to be a stable, breeding population in southern New England. It also appears to replace canadensis in the southern New England springtime niche, though some canadensis -like individuals have been taken as far south as Rhode Island. On Long Island, N.Y., south of the Long Island Sound, I have taken many bjorkae specimens during the spring months, along with typical glaucus, but canadensis- like individuals are absent. One consideration was to propose this as a new subspecies of canadensis. However, the presence of small, potential canadensis -like adults sympatric with the larger bjorkae in places like western Massachusetts, northern Connecticut and even Rhode Island, tentatively lends to species status. Much work remains to be done, to determine any relationship with canadensis populations to the north, to determine if they are allopatric (possibly with a hybrid zone), sympatric, or if bjorkae is a southern expression (subspecies) of canadensis. Habitat: Primarily a resident of deciduous forest habitats, though adults are frequently found in urban and suburban habitats. Larval Hosts: Black Cherry (Prunus serotina) is currently the only confirmed hostplant in southern New England. Prunus virginiana (Choke Cherry) is reported for the “Mid-Summer Tiger Swallowtail” in southern Ontario (Wang, 2017). Certainly, other hosts are used but require documentation based on rearing. It is not presently known if the larvae can eat canadensis -specific hosts such as Betula spp. (Birch) and Populus tremuloides (Quaking Aspen), or glaucus -specific hosts such as Liriodendron tulipifera (Tulip Tree). Habits: This butterfly appears to be primarily a forest canopy dweller, much as is P. appalachiensis of the Appalachian Mountain region. Adults are mainly observed in rapid flight in forested habitat, coming down to nectar at numerous nectar sources such as Syringa vulgaris (Common Lilac) in the spring, and Asclepias syriaca (Common Milkweed) in late June. The species is not common, and generally only seen as single individuals near the southern coastal region, though they have occasionally been observed in small “puddle parties” in Massachusetts. Broods: Apparently one brood. Obligate univoltine, corroborated by Hagen & Lederhouse (1985) for New York. Appearance of similar individuals in late summer confuses matters and requires extensive rearing to determine if hybridism influences voltinism. Confirmed early dates: April 30 (Connecticut); May 15 (Massachusetts); May 8 (Rhode Island). Confirmed late dates: June 12 (Connecticut); July 8 (Massachusetts); June 12 (Rhode Island). An overlap of flights with the “Mid-Summer Tiger Swallowtail” has not been documented in southern New England. Distinguishing features and variation: The largest of the three spring-flying Tiger Swallowtails. Wingspan of measured specimens (N=19) is 75.2-92.1 mm (averaging 84.7 mm), with a forewing length of 43.0-55.3 mm (averaging 49.2 mm). Specimens of bjorkae in this study measured larger than Vermont canadensis. The females of bjorkae are most distinct [thus selection of a female specimen to serve as the holotype] (Figs. 22, 23, 26, 27, 34). Dorsally, the female individuals are readily differentiated from glaucus by the greatly reduced row of blue submarginal chevrons on the dorsal hindwing, never forming into a solid blue band. Examined specimens and photo images reveals fewer blue chevrons than in canadensis females. Some females nearly lack the submarginal blue chevrons, except always appearing in cells CuA2 and CuA1. This gives some females the appearance of the male phenotype. The interior of the dorsal hindwing is clear yellow and is never covered by the subtle blue wash of scales found in most glaucus females. Also, the female black form has not been documented. Ventrally, the diagnostic submarginal yellow band on the forewing of bjorkae specimens is solid though the anterior portion of the band may be broken in many individuals. The hindwing is narrower and more angular than glaucus, being somewhat more similar to canadensis and appalachiensis, and is characterized by outer wing edge being more “stair-stepped” and not scalloped as in glaucus. Similarly, the postmedian boundary between interior yellow ground color and the submarginal row of blue chevrons forms a straight black ribbon. The hindwing marginal lunules are shaped more like a row of slanted rectangles, though the shape is variable. In some individuals these marginal lunules may have the look of crescents as in glaucus. Also, the black band along the inner (anal) margin is wide as in canadensis. The dorsum of bjorkae males (Fig. 24) is intermediate between glaucus and canadensis males and also very similar to males of the other New England “Tiger Swallowtail” species, and can easily be misidentified. P. bjorkae males differ from P. appalachiensis and canadensis by having more rounded wings and a broader black area on the outer portion of the dorsal hindwing; whereas the females differ by having reduced dorsal blue hindwing chevrons and a broader black outer portion of the hindwings. Some females appear male-like. P. bjorkae is also larger than canadensis. Wang (2017) illustrates a first instar “hybrid” larva from southern Ontario that is intermediate between first instar larvae of glaucus and canadensis, in which the white saddle mark of both (parent) species is present but the posterior and anterior bands typical of canadensis first instar larvae are reduced. Future studies would help document that this is consistent for bjorkae in New England. Comments: In 1984-1985 and 2006-2007 rearing experiments, females tentatively identified as bjorkae were confined on Prunus serotina, on which they readily oviposited. Approximately 10 ovae were deposited on leaves during each of the two years. The resultant larvae were reared indoors under lab conditions. The larvae produced hibernal-diapausing pupae. In the 2006-2007 experiment, one resultant female (Figs. 26-27) emerged that clearly appears to be intermediate between bjorkae and glaucus, except that she has a near absence of the dorsal hindwing blue chevrons, more typical of bjorkae. Distributional County Records: Confirmed photo or specimen records for this study. Connecticut: Fairfield, Hartford, Litchfield, Middlesex, New Haven, New London, Tolland, Windham. Massachusetts: Bristol, Essex, Hampden, Hampshire, Middlesex, Nantucket. Norfolk, Plymouth, Worcester. Rhode Island: Kent, Providence, Washington. Etymology: This butterfly is named in honor of Icelandic singer, songwriter, composer, record producer, music and fashion collaborator, actress, disk jockey, environmental activist, and personal inspiration, Björk Guðmundsdóttir (Fig. 28).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,054

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy→Travaux en français237 207→