YOUR POOR EATING HABITS MAY CAUSE YOU CANCER, FINDS DON JURAVIN
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Don Karl Juravin (Holy Land Ministry, Florida, nonprofit org) found that poor eating habits not only cause obesity, but it also increases your chances of developing cancer. Bad eating habits could be deadly. Juravin, the world’s number one weight loss expert, warns against those who do not watch what they eat.\n\nHow is your diet affecting you?\n\nJuravin suggests that if you have bad eating habits, not only does it lead to obesity, but it could give you cancer.\n\nResearch Summary\n\n\n\t\n\t80,110 cancer cases per year are caused by poor diet\n\t\n\t\n\t5.2% of all invasive cancer cases stem from obesity and lack of nutrition\n\t\n\t\n\t38.3% of colon and rectal cancers are caused by a poor diet.\n\t\n\t\n\t20% of all cancers are linked to being obese. \n\t\n\t\n\t25 is the highest BMI not linked to cancer. Any higher BMI increases risk\n\t\n\t\n\tMen between the ages of 45 and 64 were most likely to develop diet-related cancer. \n\t\n\n\n \n\nCancer is just one of the risks obese people face with poor eating habits, according to studies. \n\nA study published in the JNCI Cancer Spectrum revealed over 80,000 new cancer cases among adults (Over 20) in the United States in 2015 were discovered to have a poor diet as a contributing factor.\n\n“This works out to 5.2% of all new invasive cancer cases among US adults in 2015,” said Dr. Fang Fang Zhang, a nutrition and cancer epidemiologist at Tufts University in Boston.\n\n“This proportion is comparable to the proportion of cancer burden attributable to alcohol,” she said.\n\nThe study included data on the dietary intake of adults in the United States between 2013 and 2016, which came from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, as well as data on national cancer incidence in 2015 from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.\n\nThe researchers used a comparative risk assessment model, which involved estimating the number of cancer cases associated with poor eating habits and helped evaluate how much this may impact the U.S. cancer burden. Those estimations were made using diet-cancer associations found in separate studies.\n\nAccording to Juravin, men between 45 and 64 years old and ethnic minorities, including blacks and Hispanics, had the highest proportion of diet-associated cancer burden compared with other groups, the researchers found.\n\n7 Dietary Factors Got Evaluated\n\nSeven dietary factors were researched: poor intake of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and dairy products as well as higher consumption of processed or red meats. This also included sugary drinks like soda.\n\n“Low whole-grain consumption was associated with the largest cancer burden in the U.S, followed by low dairy intake, high processed-meat intake, low vegetable and fruit intake, high red meat intake and high intake of sugar-sweetened beverages,” Zhang said.\n\n“Previous studies provide strong evidence that high consumption of processed meat increases the risk of colorectal cancer and low consumption of whole grains increases the risk of colorectal cancer,” Zhang said. “However, our study quantified the number and proportion of new cancer cases that are attributable to poor diet at the national level.”\n\nResearchers found that colon and rectal cancers had the highest number, responsible for 38.3% of all diet-related cases.\n\n“Diet is among the few modifiable risk factors for cancer prevention,” Zhang said. “These findings underscore the need for reducing cancer burden and disparities in the U.S. by improving the intake of key food groups and nutrients.”\n\nYou Can Prevent Breast Cancer With Low-fat Eating Plans\n\nBreast cancer is less common in countries where the typical diet is plant-based and low in total fat (polyunsaturated fat and saturated fat). However, research on adult women in the United States hasn't found breast cancer risk to be related to dietary fat intake. One study suggests that girls who eat a high-fat diet during puberty, even if they don't become overweight or obese, may have a higher risk of developing breast cancer later in life.\n\nMore research is needed to better understand the effect of diet on breast cancer risk. But it is clear that calories do count and fat is a major source of calories. \n\nGo With Organic Foods Only\n\nUltra-processed foods are part of a fast-growing staple of the world’s diet. A 2016 study found that 60% of the calories in the average American diet come from this kind of food, and a 2017 study found that they make up half of the Canadian diet. They make up more than 50% of the UK diet, and more of the developing world is starting to eat this way.\n\nChanging your eating habits may prevent cancer by avoiding ultra-processed foods and instead choosing organic foods, research has shown.\n\nPeople who frequently eat organic foods lowered their overall risk of developing cancer, according to a study published last year in the medical journal JAMA Internal Medicine. Specifically, those who primarily ate organic foods were more likely to ward off non-Hodgkin lymphoma and postmenopausal breast cancer than those who rarely or never ate organic foods.\n\nAdditionally, according to a study published in the same journal in February, we face a 14% higher risk of early death with each 10% increase in the amount of ultra-processed foods we eat.\n\nBut people don’t want to make changes to their habits. \n\n“We are living in a fast world, and people are looking for convenient solutions. We are always stretched for time,” Nurgul Fitzgerald, an associate professor in the Department of Nutritional Sciences at Rutgers University, said earlier this year.\n\n“People are looking for quick solutions, a quickly made meal.”\n\nWhen selecting food, the taste is the No. 1 factor for most consumers, she said, but price and convenience are also important. The appeal of ultra-processed food is the “grab and go, ready to eat” ability.\n\nCredits\n\nResearch DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3550186\n\nResearch by: Don Karl Juravin | Don Juravin tweets | Don Juravin videos | Don Juravin page | Don Karl Juravin Linkedin | Don Juravin education | Don Juravin Pinterest | Don Juravin images | Don Juravin blogs | Don Karl Juravin Reddit | Don Juravin scholar citation | JURAVIN RESEARCH | Don Juravin writer | Don Karl Juravin blog | Google+ | Ted Talks | Don Juravin docs | Don Juravin answers | Don Karl Juravin local | Juravin blogging | Juravin posts | Don Juravin Reviews |
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,032 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».