MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893745451 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3845982

Anastatus meilingensis Sheng & Yu 1998

2017· article· en· W6893745451 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
ThématiqueMedicinal Plant Pharmacodynamics Research
Établissements canadiensAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypePedicelTarsus (eyelids)SetaPrehensile tail

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Anastatus meilingensis Sheng & Yu, 1998 Figs 34–40 Anastatus meilingensis Sheng & Yu, 1998: 5–6, fig. 1. Original type material designated Holotype CHINA: ♀, Shangrao, Jiangxi Prov., 15 Jun. 1984, YU Jingting leg. Allotype CHINA: ♂, same data as holotype. Paratypes CHINA: 28 ♀♀, same data as holotype; 40 ♀♀, Yushan, Jiangxi Prov., 2–17 May 1984, YU Jingting leg.; 10 ♀♀, Meiling, Nanchang, Jiangxi Prov., Jun. 1972, SHENG Jinkun leg.; 3 ♀♀, Meiling, Nanchang, Jiangxi Prov., Nov. 1972, SHENG Guangzhuo leg. Redescription Female (Figs 34–40) LENGTH. About 2.1–2.9 mm. COLOR. Head (Figs 34–37, 40) dark with metallic purple luster on vertex and upper face, and temple, occiput, gena and lower face with metallic green luster; ocelli brown; maxillary and labial palpi dark brown. Antenna (Fig. 36) with scape yellowish-brown, pedicel dark brown with metallic purple luster, flagellum dark brown. Pronotum (Fig. 38) yellowish-brown, with lateral margin posterolateral corner of pronotum anterior to spiracle dark brown. Mesoscutum light yellowish-brown except medial lobe (Fig. 38) with anterior convex part with golden-green metallic luster. Scutellar-axillar complex (Fig. 38) brown with metallic green luster. Tegula and prepectus (Fig. 36) light yellowish-brown, acropleuron (Fig. 36) yellowish-brown. Front leg brownish-yellow, tarsus pale; middle leg yellowish-brown with knee and apex of tibia and tarsus pale; hind leg dark brown except, tarsus light yellow. Metanotum and propodeum dark brown. Gaster (Figs 34, 36) dark brown to black with metallic luster under some angles and base partly pale yellow. HEAD. In frontal view (Fig. 37) about 1.32 × wider than high; in dorsal view (Fig. 40) width about 2.0 × length, hind margin slight concave; in lateral view (Fig. 36) about 1.55 × higher than long. Eye height 1.57 × eye length in lateral view; distance between eyes below 2.2 × distance between eyes above; malar space about 0.43 × eye height; distance between toruli 1.29 × as long as distance between torulus and clypeal edge, and 1.8 × distance between torulus and orbit; frontovertex narrower than eye. OOL: POL: LOL = 3: 9: 9. Vertex (Fig. 40) imbricate with several brown hair-like setae, frons coriaceous with white hair-like setae; lower face (Fig. 37) alveolate with short translucent hair-like setae, and medially angulate; gena strigose; parascrobal region and interantennal region rugose, interanternnal region with few translucent hair-like setae. Scrobal depression (Fig. 37) with scrobe alveolate and deep, distinctly delimited ventrally but not distinctly delimited dorsally, separated from anterior ocellus by distance equal to diameter of anterior ocellus. Lower orbit about in line with ventral margin of torulus. Antenna (Fig. 39) with relative length (width) of scape = 35(5); pedicel 7(4); anellus 3.5(3.5); 1 st to 7 th funiculars: 8(4): 9(5): 10(6): 9(6): 8(6.5): 7.5(7): 7(7); clava 18(7.5). BODY. Pronotum in dorsal view acute-triangular, concave postero-medially, smooth to very fine coriaceous, with one seta on each side along anterior margin of collar and five setae posteriorly anterior to each spiracle; median groove shallow. Mesoscutum (Fig. 38) with anterior convex medial lobe rhomboidal with sides divergent anteriorly to about middle and convergent over about posterior half, 0.6 × total length of mesoscutum, coarsely punctate-reticulate and slightly convex, and posteriorly concave part smooth and shiny, and with long translucent setae directed laterally; lateral lobe with inclined inner surface shiny, smooth, with translucent setae along outer margin. Scutellar-axillar complex (Fig. 38) convex, longitudinally coarsely reticulate, scutellum 1.6 × longer than broad. Acropleuron (Fig. 36) with fine, longitudinally aligned coriaceous sculpture, anterior one-quarter with several translucent hair-like setae. Brachypterous; fore wing (Fig. 34) about 0.4–0.5 mm in length, 4 × as long as wide, with apex rounded and extending only slightly over middle of Mt2; basal plate with three dark brown setae; basal cell almost bare, only three or four brown setae apically; costal cell ventrally with four setae at base, and dorsally bare; SMV extending two-thirds length of wing, MV, STV and PMV absent; disc with basal two-thirds hyaline, almost bare, only several hyaline thin setae scattered, and apical one-third with dense yellowish-brown setae, without hyaline cross-band. LEGS (Fig. 36). Profemur with ventral margin evenly arched, without tooth. Middle leg with spur slightly shorter than basitarsus; mesotibia with apical pegs in a patch; basal four tarsomeres with black pegs on each side. Hind leg with basitarsus as long as following three tarsomeres combined. GASTER (Figs 34, 36). Slightly shorter than mesosoma; ovipositor exserted for distance equal to no more than half length of syntergum. Notes Of the original type material, only four unlabeled females were found that resemble the original description and illustration provided for A. meilingensis. One complete female is here interpreted as holotype of the species. A second female lacks the funicle and clava of both antennae, and left front leg and right metatarsi. The third female lacks the right protarsi, and the fourth female lacks its left antenna, right funicle and clava, and right mesotarsus. Remarks Females of this species resemble those of A. huangi, but are differentiated by the following characters: fore wing much shorter, extending only slightly over middle of Mt2 compared to middle of gaster for A. huangi (cf. Figs 32, 34); fore wing disc with apical one-third densely setose with yellowish-brown setae, without hyaline cross-band compared to fore wing disc of A. huangi with thinner brownish setae, and has a tapered hyaline cross-band behind marginal vein; anterior convex medial lobe rhomboidal compared to triangular for A. huangi with (cf. Figs 31, 38); hind leg with basitarsus as long as following three tarsomeres compared to following four tarsomeres in A. huangi (cf. Figs 33, 36). In the key of Kalina (1981), A. meilingensis keys out to A. gastropachae, which is a brachypterous form of A. bifasciatus (Geoffroy, 1785) based on the rearings and synonym of Ishii (1938). The original description of A. gastropachae (Ashmead 1904) states that the fore wings are “fuscous, with a transverse band at base and [within] apical third hyaline”, whereas A. meilingensis has the basal two-thirds hyaline and the apical one-third with yellowish-brown setae, which is similar to the fore wing color pattern of A. meilingensis females. Females of A. gastropachae determined in 2015 by L. Fusu in the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids & Nematodes (Ottawa) were examined by the senior author. Females have the medial lobe of mesoscutum triangular, the gaster longer than the mesosoma, and the scrobal depression distinctly delimited dorsally compared to A. gastropachae.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,580
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,994

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0220,015

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,198
Tête enseignante GPT0,435
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetMedicinal Plant Pharmacodynamics ResearchTravaux en français237 207