MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893762217 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337907

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) tessellatosum Gardner & Gibbs 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6893762217 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueBryophyte Studies and Records
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHomonym (biology)PsylloideaReticulateTaxonomy (biology)Homoptera

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) tessellatosum sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 70FF0DE1-A7C4-4019-A346-41F5D5F6C6F4 Figs 81–83, 93A, 94A Diagnosis Females of Lasioglossum tessellatosum sp. nov. can be recognized by the head and mesosoma with very strong tessellate to reticulate microsculpture often obscuring the punctures, scutum with sparse punctures (i= 1–4 pd) abruptly becoming denser laterad of the parapsidal lines (i <2 pd), frons with relatively large and crowded punctures (i =0 pd), T1 anterior surface shiny, metasomal terga lacking tomentum, and T2 without dark spiracular spots. They are most similar to L. meteorum sp. nov. Females of L. meteorum sp. nov. have the frons with finer and distinctly separated punctures, scutum with slightly weaker (but still strong) microsculpture, T1 anterior surface coriarious, and metasomal terga with some sparse tomentum. Males of L. tessellatosum sp. nov. can be recognized by the scutum tessellate with sparse punctures (i =1–4 pd) abruptly becoming dense laterad of the parapsidal lines (i ≤ 1 pd), mesepisternum tessellate and densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd), clypeus densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd) with very narrow black to brown apical band, frons very dull and densely punctate (i=0 pd), and metasomal terga with broad impunctate rims. They are most similar to L. meteorum sp. nov. Males of L. meteorum sp. nov. have the clypeus and mesepisternum sparsely punctate (i = 1–4 pd), scutum and mesepisternum with weaker microsculpture, and clypeus without any non-metallic apical band. Etymology The specific epithet tessellatosum is formed from the Latin adjective ‘ tessellatum ’ (‘inlaid with small square stones’, a mosaic) and the suffix ‘ -osum ’, indicating fullness or abundance. It refers to the very strong microsculpture of this species. An appropriate translation would be the tessellate sweat bee. Material examined Holotype MEXICO – Chiapas • ♀; Villa Corzo; 16.23° N, 93° W; 623 m a.s.l.; 3 Feb. 2016; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB. [Verbatim label: ECOAB.79796 / Mex., Chis / Villa Corzo / 632 m / 16,23 N; 93 W / 2/3/2016 / Philippe Sagot // BOLD / DLIII117-18 / gard0051-MX // HOLOTYPE / Lasioglossum (Dialictus) tessellatosum Gardner and Gibbs] Paratypes GUATEMALA – Huehuetenango • 1 ♀; San Antonio Hulsta, Cajuil; 15.63746° N, 91.78722° W; 1026 m a.s.l.; 5 Jul. 2010; Mario leg.; ex Coffea; ECOAB. – Quetzaltenango • 1 ♀; 5 mi. E of Coatepeque; [14.7° N, 91.8° W]; 4 Jul. 1965; Slobodchikoff and Raske leg.; EMEC. MEXICO – Chiapas • 1 ♀; Jaltenango Paz; 15.82° N, 92.79° W; 692 m a.s.l.; 3 Feb. 2016; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB • 1 ♀; La Trinitaria, San Francisco de Asis; 16.0232° N, 92.0455° W; 768 m a.s.l.; 16 Nov. 2011; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB • 1 ♀; Mapastepec, Camino A Santa Rosa; 15.3405° N, 92.5757° W; 24 Feb. 2005; R. Ayala, R. Vandame and M. Guzmán leg.; ECOAB. – Chihuahua • 3 ♀♀; Santo Niño; [27° N, 107° W]; 31 Aug. 1968; T.A. Sears, R.C. Gardner and C.S. Glaser leg.; UCDC. – Hidalgo • 1 ♀; 14.5 km NW of Cardonal; [20.73° N, 99.15° W]; 1850 m a.s.l.; 13 Jul. 1990; W. Bell, D. Conlon and R.L. Minckley leg.; ex Agave; SEMC. – Jalisco • 3 ♀♀; Careyes; 19.4289° N, 105.0274° W; 12 Feb.–19 Mar. 1997; F.D. Parker leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀, 1 ♂; Guadalajara; [20.65° N, 103.35° W]; Crawford leg.; USNM • 1 ♀; Puerto Vallarta; 20.6214° N, 105.226° W; 25 Jan. 1984; G.E. Bohart leg.; BBSL. – Morelos • 1 ♀; 7.3 mi. S. Yautepec; [18.78° N, 99.06° W]; 914 m a.s.l.; 15 Aug. 1962; Marston and Naumann leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 16 Aug. 1962; Ordway and Naumann leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; Cañon de Lobos; [18.86° N, 99.12° W]; 23–30 Mar. 1961; C. Benschoter leg.; UMSP. – Veracruz • 1 ♂; Orizaba; [18.85° N, 97.1° W]; Crawford leg.; USNM. Description Female COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue-green to golden-green; clypeus apical colour black, reddish brown, or orange; labrum reddish brown to orange; mandible orange with black base and red tip; flagellum black to dark reddish brown dorsally, slightly lighter ventrally; pronotal lobe black, reddish brown, or orange; metasoma orange with T1 basal half and T5 sometimes black to brown, dark spiracular spots on T3–4; legs reddish brown with femur-tibia joints, tarsi, and sometimes tibiae mostly orange; tegula orange; wing membrane lightly infuscated, veins with subcosta dark brown, otherwise light brown to pale amber. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour white to pale yellow. Tomentum dense on pronotal collar and lobe, space between pronotal lobe and tegula, and metepisternum ventral half; sparse on paraocular area, vertex, gena, and metanotum. Scutum hair thin. Wing hairs dark or light, short and dense. Acarinarial fan incomplete, sparse. T2 fringes sparse, T3 fringes sparse. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), small on basal margin, otherwise large and somewhat irregular, sculpture tessellate in basal half, shiny apically; supraclypeal area punctures dense marginally (i ≤ 1 pd), sparse medially (i=1–3 pd), sculpture tessellate, sometimes shiny medially; paraocular area punctures dense (i <1 pd), often obscure, sculpture shiny ventrally and in narrow line adjacent to compound eye, otherwise tessellate; frons punctures crowded (i=0 pd), often indistinct, sculpture reticulate or ruguloso-punctate; vertex punctures crowded laterally (i= 0 pd), often obscure, absent medially, sculpture shiny or weakly tessellate; gena punctures fine, moderately dense (i=1–2 pd), sculpture shiny; postgena sculpture shiny to tessellate, becoming ruguloso-lineate posteriorly; tegula punctures absent; scutum punctures sparse (i =1–4 pd), usually abruptly becoming dense to moderately dense laterad of parapsidal line (i <2 pd), sculpture finely reticulate; scutellum punctures dense marginally and on median line (i <1 pd), sparse submedially (i=1–2 pd); minute and hardly evident in anterior half, larger and more distinct posteriorly, sculpture finely reticulate; metanotum sculpture finely reticulate and moderately densely punctate (i=1–2 pd); metapostnotum rugae weak or moderately strong, anastomosing, reaching about halfway to margin, sculpture tessellate; preëpisternum sculpture finely reticulate and densely but obscurely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd); hypoepimeron punctures dense (i <1 pd), obscure, sculpture finely reticulate; mesepisternum punctures dense dorsally (i ≤ 1 pd), becoming sparse ventrally (i =1–2 pd), mostly obscured by microsculpture, sculpture finely reticulate; metepisternum sculpture ruguloso-lineate dorsally, becoming rugulose ventrally; propodeum lateral face sculpture tessellate; propodeum posterior face sculpture tessellate; T1 anterior face sculpture shiny; T1 dorsal surface punctures very fine and sparse (i=2–6 pd), absent in median line and small apicolateral oval patches, sculpture shiny; T2 disc punctures fine, moderately sparse (i =1–3 pd), disc sculpture shiny to weakly coriarious, rim punctures shallow and obscure, moderately sparse (i =1–3 pd), rim sculpture weakly coriarious. STRUCTURE. Face length/width ratio 0.81 (± 0.02 SD). Clypeus projecting ~50% below suborbital tangent; clypeal area length/width ratio 0.43 (± 0.01 SD); apicolateral denticles rounded knobs; supraclypeal area length/width ratio 0.66 (± 0.05 SD). Forewing with 3 submarginal cells; pronotal angle slightly obtuse, nearly right-angled; tegula shape normal. Intertegular distance 1 (± 0.11 SD) mm. Scutum length/width ratio 0.84 (± 0.04 SD); scutum/scutellum length ratio 2.92 (± 0.13 SD); scutellum/metanotum length ratio 1.61 (± 0.18 SD); metanotum/metapostnotum length ratio 0.62 (± 0.08 SD). Propodeum lateral carinae not reaching dorsal margin; oblique carina absent. T2 depressed apical rim length less than 50% of segment. (n =10) Male COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue-green to olive green; clypeus apical colour narrowly black to reddish brown; labrum black to reddish brown; mandible brown with black basal band and red tip; flagellum reddish brown; pronotal lobe reddish brown; metasoma black to reddish brown; legs reddish brown; tegula brown; wing membrane lightly infuscated, veins dark brown. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour pale yellow to white. Tomentum dense in space between pronotal lobe and tegula; sparse on face below eye emargination, gena anteriorly, and pronotal angle and lobe. Scutum hair thin. Sterna hair moderately long (1–2 OD), moderately plumose, sparse and erect. Wing hairs dark, short and dense. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), diversopunctate, sculpture shiny; supraclypeal area punctures moderately sparse (i= 1–2 pd), obscure, sculpture tessellate; paraocular area punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; frons punctures crowded (i= 0 pd), sculpture reticulate-rugulose, becoming shiny to imbricate laterally; vertex punctures crowded laterally (i=0 pd), dense (i ≤ 1 pd) and obscure medially, sculpture imbricate to finely reticulate; gena punctures moderately sparse (i=1–2 pd), sculpture shiny, becoming imbricate posteriorly and ventrally; postgena sculpture shiny, becoming imbricate posteriorly and laterad of hypostomal carina; tegula punctures absent; scutum punctures sparse (i =1–4 pd), abruptly becoming dense laterad of parapsidal lines (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture tessellate to finely reticulate; scutellum punctures dense marginally and on median line (i ≤ 1 pd), sparse submedially (i =1–4 pd), sculpture tessellate to finely reticulate, becoming shiny submedially; metanotum sculpture finely reticulate, sometimes becoming shiny medially, and moderately sparsely punctate (i=1–2 pd); metapostnotum rugae strong, anastomosing, not reaching margin, sculpture imbricate; preëpisternum sculpture areolate-rugulose to rugose; hypoepimeron punctures dense (i <1 pd), sculpture tessellate to finely reticulate; mesepisternum punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture tessellate to finely reticulate; metepisternum sculpture lineate dorsally, areolate ventrally; propodeum lateral face punctures obscure, sculpture tessellate to weakly rugulose; propodeum posterio

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,479
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,175 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetBryophyte Studies and RecordsTravaux en français237 207