Allocapnia menawa Grubbs & Sheldon 2008, sp. n.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Allocapnia menawa sp. n. (Figs. 25-32) Material examined. Holotype ♂ and paratype ♀, U.S.A., Alabama, Clay Co., tributary to Cheaha Creek, Talladega National Forest, 19 km N Ashland, 33.4397°N, 085.8387°W, 28 December 2007, S.A. Grubbs (INHS). Additional paratypes: same but 14 ♂, 6 ♀ (WKU); same but 4 December 2006, 1 ♂, A.L. Sheldon (WKU). Male. Body length 5.0–6.0 mm. Wings reaching from 5 th to the 7 th abdominal terga. Seventh abdominal terga unmodified. Dorsal process of 8 th terga elevated steeply above the abdominal plane (Fig. 25); process generally flat or weakly convex in lateral view with paired, poorly-developed, subapical setose processes (Figs. 26–28); process rugose, outer aspect broadly ushaped, inner aspect v-shaped, process lobes separated by shallow emargination anteriormedially (Fig. 27–28). Apical limb of epiproct upper limb subequal in length of basal limb (Fig. 25), markedly enlarged in distal half with slight subterminal emargination (Fig. 29), expanded slightly medially in dorsal view, tip broadly rounded (Figs. 30–31). Female. Body length 6.0–7.0 mm. Wings reaching 8 th terga to beyond tip of abdomen. Eighth abdominal sterna darkly sclerotized medially, only slightly sclerotized laterally, terminating in saginate projection posteriorly; separated from 7 th sterna by membrane (Fig. 32). Etymology. The species name, used as a noun in apposition, honors Menawa of the Upper Creek Native Americans. Menawa was a Creek leader who was instrumental in opposing encroachment on Creek lands. The common name, Menawa snowfly, is proposed for this species (Stark et al. 1998). Diagnosis. Allocapnia menawa is a member of the A. granulata group (Ross & Ricker 1971), which is currently comprised of seven species. Five species in particular, A. frisoni Ross & Ricker, A. granulata (Claassen), A. peltoides Ross & Ricker, A. unzickeri Ross & Yamamoto and A. warreni Ross & Yamamoto, possess the subapical paired setose processes exhibited by A. menawa. The remaining two species in this group, A. fumosa Ross and A. simmonsi Kondratieff & Voshell, lack setose processes. Allocapnia menawa most closely resembles A. granulata, A. unzickeri, and A. warreni. The epiproct apical limb to basal limb ratio of 1X exhibited by A. menawa (Fig. 25) is readily distinguished from A. unzickeri and A. warreni. Both A. unzickeri (Fig. 33) and A. warreni (Ross & Ricker 1971, Fig. 23) possess an epiproct apical limb that is noticeably longer than the basal limb and have slim profiles in lateral aspect. Although the epiproct of A. granulata varies considerably across its broad range (Ross & Yamamoto 1967), the combination of the heavily enlarged epiproct apical limb and the dorsal process of the 8 th abdominal terga can differentiate A. menawa. The moderately enlarged apical limb of A. granulata depictedherefromsouthernKentucky (Fig. 34) and western Pennsylvania (Fig. 35) are typical of the central and northern populations with eastern genitalia described by Ross & Yamamoto (1967) yet not to the extent of A. menawa (Figs. 25, 29). The rugose dorsal process of A. granulata bears lobes that vary in length but are well separated apically (Figs. 37–38). In contrast, the dorsal process lobes of A. menawa are nearly convergent anteriomedially and appear triangular posteriorly (Fig. 28). The lobes of A. granulata are broadly rounded posteriorly. The females of A. menawa (Fig. 32) and A. granulata (Fig. 40) are very similar, and species recognition requires associated males. The female of A. unzickeri is easily distinguished from A. menawa since the 8 th abdominal sterna of the former species is either broadly truncate (Fig. 39) or slightly concave. The female of A. warreni is unknown. The geographic range of A. menawa is allopatric with A. granulata, A. unzickeri, and A. warreni. Allocapnia granulata has a broad geographical range in the eastern Nearctic region, recorded from Oklahoma north to Minnesota and Quebec and south to Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia (Ross & Ricker 1971; Poulton & Stewart 1991; Kondratieff & Baumann 2000; Nations et al. 2007). Allocapnia granulata has also been collected from large streams flanking the Appalachian Mountains, yet does not extend to smaller, upland streams of the Talladega National Forest area. James (1972; Fig. 118) recorded this species only from two northeastern Alabama counties. Allocapnia unzickeri is distributed mainly within the Cumberland Plateau region in southern Tennessee and A. warreni is known only from northwestern Arkansas (Poulton & Stewart, 1991). Remarks. Allocapnia menawa has been collected only from the type locality, but is likely to be found from additional upland stream habitats in the Talladega National Forest area. Allocapnia aurora, A. muskogee n. sp., and A. recta were the only other stonefly species obtained with A. menawa.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».