Petalomonas poosilla Larsen and Patterson 1990
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Petalomonas poosilla Larsen and Patterson, 1990 (fi gures 14g, h, 16e -g) Description. We describe two populations of cells. Population 1: small cells; ovate, 5-9 Mm long, 3-5 Mm wide, dorso-ventrally fl attened. This species may or may not have up to three dorsal ridges and the ridges may or may not be well developed. The organism may also have two fi ne ventral ridges which are di ffi cult to observe. The right ventral ridge runs beneath the reservoir along the cell. With one fl agellum as long as the cell. The reservoir is in the right side of the cell and the nucleus is in the left side. Moves by gliding. Common. Population 2: Larger cells; cell outline oblong-oval, 10-12 Mm long and 5-6 Mm wide, dorso-ventrally fl attened. It has four ridges extending along the cell: two indistinct dorsal ridges located at the lateral margins of the cell; two fi ne ventral ridges, the right one of which runs beneath the reservoir. One fl agellum is about as long as the cell or slightly longer. The ovate reservoir is anteriorly situated in the right-hand side of the cell and the nucleus in the left-hand side of the cell. Often co-occurs with the smaller cell. Remarks. Larsen and Patterson (1990) provided a new name for P. pusilla Skuja, 1948 (P. poosilla) because under the principle of co-ordination of the ICZN, P. pusilla Skuja, 1948 is a homonym of P. mediocanellata var. pusilla Klebs, 1893 (Lemmermann, 1913) —which we refer to as P. minuta (see P. minuta above). Petalomonas poosilla and P. minuta resemble each other in shape and appearance, but can be distinguised by the presence of what we regard as a longitudinal groove in P. minuta. Petalomonas poosilla was originally described under the name P. pusilla (5-12 Mm long) from freshwater sites (Skuja, 1948) and has since been found in marine sites in Australia, Brazil, Danish Wadden Sea, Fiji, Gulf of Finland; Hawaii and NE Canada (Lackey and Lackey, 1970; Larsen, 1987; Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Vørs, 1992a; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong et al., 1998). We observed cells (in the small population) which are similar in size and outline to P. poosilla as described by Larsen and Patterson (1990). This species has been described without ridges or grooves (Skuja, 1948; Larsen and Patterson, 1990). Cells assigned to this species have been described more recently as having ridges (Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Schroeckh and Patterson, unpubl.). We suspect that this species has previously been under-described and regard the latter descriptions as more accurate than the former. The ventral face of this species is very similar to that of P. minor, described here, in having two fi ne ventral ridges and in the position of the ridges, but the two species can be distinguished by cell shape and the dorsal fl ange in P. minor. Petalomonas poosilla and P. minuta resemble each other in shape and appearance, but can be distinguised by the presence of what we regard as a longitudinal groove in P. minuta. This species resembles P. cantuscygni (see Cann and Pennick, 1986) from which it can be distinguished by never having fewer than six dorsal ridges. We have observed larger cells about 10-12 Mm long, but they consistently had four discrete ridges on both sides of the cell. The two populations often co-occur. Although these may represent a separate species, we have been unable to establish morphological discontinuities by which single cells could be easily identi fi ed when comparisons are made. Further studies are required to establish the status of the two populations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».