MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893847009 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6053351

Hemilophini Tirant, 2017, sp. nov.

2017· article· en· W6893847009 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaArthropod mouthpartsBasal (medicine)Simple eye in invertebratesApex (geometry)Sensillum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Hemilophini Cirrhicera veilleuxi, sp. nov. (Figs 1–4) Description. Female. Head dark brown except distal area of clypeus and basal area of labrum reddish-brown; mouthparts reddish-brown; antennae dark brown; central area of pronotum dark reddish-brown; sides of prothorax dark brown; ventral side of thorax reddish-brown, darkened laterally; elytra dark reddish-brown; femora reddishbrown, gradually lighter toward apex; tibiae and tarsi light reddish-brown. Head. Basal area distinctly convex dorsally. Frons moderately finely and abundantly punctate; glabrous centrally toward clypeus, with silky grayish pubescence toward vertex, with short and long, erect brown setae laterally; area between bases of antennal tubercles with arched nearly smooth band. Area between antennal tubercles with punctures as on frons, but distinctly sparser; with silky grayish pubescence. Area between upper eye lobes moderately finely abundantly punctate (punctures more abundant toward eyes); with silky grayish pubescence interspersed with sparse, long, erect yellowish setae laterally. Remaining surface of vertex slightly more sparsely punctate than on area between upper eye lobes; with silky grayish pubescence except nearly glabrous large triangular basal area (apparently pubescence lost). Area behind eye lobes moderately finely punctate near eye (punctures sparser toward apex of lower eye lobe), smooth toward prothorax; with silky grayish pubescence close to eye, nearly glabrous toward prothorax. Genae 1.3 times longer than lower eye lobe, microsculptured, interspersed with fine sparse punctures on basal 2/3, transversely striate on distal third except smooth distal area; with silky grayish pubescence on basal half, gradually sparser toward glabrous apex; with long, erect, sparse dark setae. Antennal tubercles densely micropunctate; with silky grayish pubescence, sparser toward apex, interspersed with moderately short, erect dark setae. Median longitudinal groove distinct from middle of frons to prothorax. Pretentorial pits well-marked. Limit between frons and postclypeus indistinct; limit between postclypeus and anteclypeus slightly indicated (more so laterally); basal dark area of postclypeus minutely, sparsely punctate, nearly glabrous; light distal area smooth and glabrous. Labrum convex, almost coplanar with anteclypeus on at about basal half, distinctly inclined on distal half, with limit between these areas with narrow, arched carina; convex and inclined areas densely, minutely punctate close to carina, nearly smooth on base and apex; with minute, sparse, decumbent setae on coplanar area; with long, erect, yellowish-brown setae on punctate base of inclined area. Distance between upper eye lobes 0.42 times length of scape; in frontal view, distance between lower eye lobes 0.91 times length of scape. Antennae 1.8 times elytral length, reaching elytral apex at distal quarter of antennomere VII; scape, pedicel and antennomeres III–IV with long, erect, dark setae ventrally; tuft of long dark setae on antennomeres V–VI dense and long (most setae longer than three times diameter of antennomere), reaching distal quarter of antennomere VI; antennal formula (ratio) based on length of antennomere III: scape = 0.71; pedicel = 0.10; IV = 0.75; V = 0.43; VI = 0.39; VII = 0.31; VIII = 0.27; IX = 0.24; X = 0.22; XI = 0.26. Thorax. Prothorax 1.25 times wider than long, parallel-sided on basal third, slightly widened on central third, nearly parallel-sided on distal third. Pronotum distinctly elevated from distal 2/3, with elongate central gibbosity at about central third; centrally with V-shaped area with dense grayish pubescence partially obscuring integument gradually black toward distal area (basal pubescence darker depending on angle of light source; partially lost), except glabrous central gibbosity; finely, abundantly punctate on V-shaped area except smooth central gibbosity and distal third with sparse punctures; remaining surface with dense pale yellow pubescence obscuring integument, continuing toward sides of prothorax. Sides of prothorax close to prosternum with wide, oblique band coarsely, moderately abundant punctate, with yellowish-brown pubescence on basal third, grayish on remaining surface. Prosternum with pale yellow pubescence distinctly exposing integument centrally, nearly glabrous laterally close to procoxal cavities; prosternal process with pale yellow pubescence exposing integument. Mesoventrite with pale yellow pubescence exposing integument, especially laterally; mesoventral process with lobes projected on mesocoxae distally; with pale yellow pubescence exposing integument. Mesanepisternum, mesepimeron and metanepisternum with dense pale yellow pubescence obscuring integument. Metaventrite with dense pale yellow pubescence obscuring integument laterally, exposing integument on large subtriangular central area; central discrimen well-marked. Scutellum with minute pale yellow pubescence distinctly exposing integument except glabrous sides. Elytra. Moderately coarsely, abundantly punctate on basal half, gradually finer, sparser toward nearly smooth distal area (punctures subaligned in rows); each elytron with two large maculae with dense pale yellow pubescence obscuring integument dorsally (more whitish than on prothorax), one basally, almost reaching apex of basal third, with outer margin curved, another trapezoid, from slightly before middle to distal quarter, reaching suture and lateral carina (widened toward suture); with another small macula with dense pale yellow pubescence obscuring integument basally between lateral carina and epipleuron; remaining surface with minute, moderately dense pubescence, but distinctly exposing integument, mostly brown between large pale yellow maculae, more grayish on distal quarter (pubescence on both areas with variable color depending on angle of light source); apex obliquely truncate, with outer angle slightly triangularly projected and sutural angle with short spine. Legs. Femora and tibiae with pale yellow pubescence exposing integument, interspersed with long, erect yellow and brown setae on tibiae. Metatarsomere I 0.7 times II–III together. Abdomen. Ventrite I with yellow pubescence exposing integument, except irregular, oblique maculae with denser pale yellow pubescence placed dorsally on each side of center (slightly distinct); ventrite II with yellow pubescence exposing integument, except one large macula with dense pale yellow pubescence obscuring integument placed on each side of basal 2/3; ventrites III–V with brown pubescence slightly obscuring integument; apex of ventrite V deeply emarginate centrally. Dimensions (mm), holotype female. Total length, 18.13; prothoracic length, 3.42; basal prothoracic width, 3.87; distal prothoracic width, 4.05; largest prothoracic width, 4.18; humeral width, 5.71; elytral length, 12.00. Type material. Holotype female from MEXICO, Veracruz: Los Tuxtlas (900 m), 1-20.VI.2016, J. H. Garcia col. (MZSP). Etymology. The new species is named after Pierre Veilleux, entomological technician at the Montreal Insectarium (IMCQ). Remarks. Cirrhicera veilleuxi sp. nov. is similar to C. conspicua Gahan, 1892, but differs as follows: head without dense pale yellow pubescence obscuring integument; second macula with dense pale yellow pubescence on elytra trapezoid and not surpassing lateral carina; elytral apex obliquely truncate. In C. conspicua the head has dense pale yellow pubescence obscuring integument, second dorsal elytral macula rectangular and distinctly surpassing lateral carina, and the elytral apex is rounded. Additionally, examination of photograph of the syntype male of C. conspicua shows that the tuft of setae on antennomeres V–VI is distinctly shorter than in the new species. According to Gahan (1892) the pale yellow pubescence on abdominal ventrites of the syntypes are different: covering sides of ventrites I–II in male; covering ventrites I–III and forming spot on each side of ventrites IV–V in female. This suggests that the abdominal pubescence is variable and thus, we are not using it as a differential feature. Chemsak (1972) revised the genus Cirrhicera Thomson, 1857, confirmed the shape of the elytral apex of C. conspicua (curiously a feature not recorded in the original description), and provided a key to known species of the genus. Cirrhicera veilleuxi can be included in the alternative of couplet “3” from Chemsak (1972): 3(2). Elytra with pubescent fasciae extending over most of surface................................................... 4 – Elytra with dense pubescence forming two large maculae dorsally.............................................. 3’ 3’(3). Head with dense pale yellow pubescence obscuring integument; elytral apex rounded. Mexico (Guerrero)..... C. conspicua – Head without dense pale yellow pubescence obscuring integument; elytral apex obliquely truncate. Mexico (Veracruz)...... ..................................................................................... C. veilleuxi sp. nov.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,321
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetParasite Biology and Host Interactions→Travaux en français237 207→