MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6893861934 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5697779

Synchroa punctata Newman 1838

2018· article· en· W6893861934 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueInsects and Parasite Interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFunnelType localityWestern Hemlock

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Synchroa punctata Newman, 1838 Figs 3A–B, 4A, G, 5A–B, M, 6A–E Synchroa punctata Newman, 1838: 378. Diagnosis This species can be easily distinguished from other species of Synchroa by the following combination of characters: body densely covered by pale simple setae; pronotum smooth and impunctate in medio-longitudinal part of posterior half, lateral sides almost entirely margined; prosternal process with long oval apex; aedeagus: parameres moderately narrowed apically, abruptly strongly narrowed at apex. Material examined UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 3 larvae, Hemlock Draw, Sauk Co., Wisconsin, 43°21′50″ N, 89°56′49″ W, 30 Mar. 2001, D.S. Biggs leg. (YHC); 1 ♀, Hemlock Draw, Sauk Co., Wisconsin, 43°21′46″ N, 89°56′34″ W, 11–20 Jun. 2001, Lindgren Funnel Trap, D. Young leg. (YHC); 1 ♂, 1 ♀, same locality data as previous, 6–11 Jul. 2001, Lindgren Funnel Trap, D. Young leg. (YHC); 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, same locality data as previous, 19–25 Jul. 2001, Lindgren Funnel Trap, D. Young leg. (YHC); 1 larva, Merrill, Marathon Co., Wisconsin, 22 Feb. 2003, E. Nowak leg. (YHC); 1 larva, Hemlock Draw, Sauk Co., Wisconsin, 43°21′46″ N, 89°56′57″ W, 21 Apr. 2003, A. Bendlin leg. (YHC); 5 larvae, Otter Creek, Rock Co., Wisconsin, 27 Apr. 2003, A. Bendlin leg. (YHC); 1 ex., West Jefferson, 20 km W of Columbus, Ohio, 6 Jun. 2008, Košťál leg. (OKCZ). CANADA: 1 ex., Warwick Conservation Area, Ontario, 42.995 N, 81.948 W, Jul. 2014, collector unknown (OKCZ); 1 ex., Ottawa, Stittsville, Ontario, 45.275 N, 75.972 W, 3 Jul. 2014, collector unknown (OKCZ); 1 ex., Cornwall, Ontario, 45.04384 N, 74.71467 W, 14 Jul. 2014, collector unknown (OKCZ); 2 ex., Cornwall, Ontario, 45.04384 N, 74.71467 W, 14 Jul. 2014, collector unknown (OKCZ); 2 ex., Merritt island, Ontario, 43.00255 N, 79.241 W, 16 Jul. 2014, collector unknown (OKZC); 1 ♂, Boucherville, Québec, 45.55 N, 73.42 W, 21 Aug. 2014, collector unknown (YHC); 1 ♂, Québec, 46.79416 N, 71.32895 W, 14 Jul. 2015, collector unknown (YHC); 2 ex., Brantford, Ontario, 43.15806 N, 80.35835 W, 27 Jul. 2015, collector unknown (OKCZ). Redescription COLOUR. Body and legs completely blackish-brown. Antennae brown in some specimens. Male (Fig. 3A) MEASUREMENTS. Length: 9.50–11.50 mm; width: 2.25–2.75 mm. BODY. Elongate, slightly flattened, elytra rather strongly narrowed posteriorly, covered with pale, elongate and decumbent setae. HEAD. Eyes lateral, large, emarginate in front of antennal insertions, ratio of eye diameter to interocular space 1.0: 1.5–1.7. Antennae filiform, when directed backwards exceeding the humeri of elytra. Scape cylindrical, wider than other antennomeres, pedicel short, antennomere III–XI somewhat clavate, XI longest, length ca 4.5–4.6 times maximum width. Length ratio of antennomeres as follows: 1.90:1.00: 2.60:2.45: 2.30: 1.95: 1.85: 2.10:2.10: 1.90: 3.20. Apical maxillary palpomere securiform, apical margin moderately rounded, terminal angle somewhat obtuse. Surface lustrous, densely and coarsely punctate; interspaces slightly narrower than puncture diameter. PRONOTUM. Truncate anteriorly, anterior edge slightly concave, bisinuate posteriorly, with obtuse median lobe, width ca 1.4–1.5 times as long as length, ca 1.6–1.7 times as wide as head. Lateral sides rounded and strongly narrowed in anterior two-thirds toward head, subparallel in posterior one-third, completely or almost completely margined. Anterior angle rounded; posterior angle rectangular and obtuse. Disc slightly flattened medially, surface lustrous, densely and coarsely punctate; spaces between punctures smaller than puncture diameter. Scutellum width ca 1.50–1.70 times length. ELYTRA. Elongate, narrowed posteriorly, apex rounded, as wide as pronotal width at humeri, length ca 2.6–2.7 times width, surface lustrous. Disc covered with oval punctures, denser in lateral and basal part; interspaces wider than puncture diameter. Nine faint traces of striae in each elytron in dorsal view, stria I fused with II (numbered from suture to lateral side) (Fig. 4A), gradually shortened outwards; elytral striae indistinct in some specimens. Prosternum before procoxae about as long as shortest diameter of procoxae. Prosternal process long, margined laterally, long oval, extending well beyond procoxae; length behind procoxae longer than width between procoxae. Width between procoxae ca 0.2 times transverse coxa diameter. Mesoventrite with shallow, oval mesoventral cavity, moderately punctate. Abdominal ventrite V truncate, with lateral sides nearly straight (Fig. 4G); sternite VIII concave in middle of apical edge, forming two rounded lobes on both sides, moderately pubescent apically (Fig. 5B); sternite IX without spiculum gastrale on apical edge (Fig. 5M); tergite VIII without median strut on apical edge, rounded apically, moderately pubescent apically (Fig. 5A); tergite IX and X completely fused, rounded apically, densely pubescent on apical edge (Fig. 5M). LEGS. Slender. Tarsomeres simple, tarsal formula 5-5-4. The longest spur of hind tibiae ca 0.3 times as long as first tarsal segment; length ratio of tarsomeres as follows: 2.30: 1.00: 0.55: 0.85 (measured without claws). Claws simple. AEDEAGUS (Fig. 6A–E). Lanceloate, basal piece curved dorsally, lateral sides roundly arcuate, narrowed basically. Parameres narrowly separated apically with a groove in dorsal median part; lateral sides of the aedeagus almost straight, slightly constricted medially (Fig. 6A–B) or distinctly widened in middle (Fig. 6C), moderately narrowed apically, abruptly strongly narrowed at apex, length ca 3.3–3.5 times maximum width. Median lobe elongate, tapered, strongly narrowed in the apical half. Female (Fig. 3B) MEASUREMENTS. Length: 10.00– 13.50 mm; width: 2.50–3.00 mm. BODY. Similar to male. HEAD. Eyes smaller than in male, ratio of eye diameter to interocular space 1.0: 1.9–2.0. Antennae shorter in male, when directed backwards extending the posterior edge of pronotum, antennomere XI ca 3.6–3.7 times as long as maximum width. Length ratio of antennomeres as follows: 1.50: 1.00: 2.85:2.00: 1.70: 1.90: 1.70: 1.75: 1.70:1.75: 2.85. PRONOTUM. Ca 1.5 times wider than length, ca 1.7 times as wide as head. ELYTRA. Slightly wider than in male, as wide as pronotal width at humeri, length ca 2.5–2.6 times width. OVIPOSITOR. Paraproct elongate, ca 3.1–3.2 times length of coxite, sides straight and subparallel; proctiger subtruncate. Notes This species is fairly common in eastern North America, found on tree bark or attracted to light. It can also be collected using Malaise or Lindgren funnel traps. Larvae develop in the moist environment beneath the bark of decaying woods (Payne 1931; Young 1991, 2002; Majka & Pollock 2006; Ślipiński & Lawrence 2010). Distribution Eastern North America: USA, Canada.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,888
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2240,138

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle